Optimization of Sparse 4D Seismic Surveys Using Seismic Full Waveform Inversion

Author(s):  
S. Carpentier ◽  
B. Boullenger
2022 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-8
Author(s):  
Keith Millis ◽  
Guillaume Richard ◽  
Chengbo Li

In the life cycle of a seismic product, the lion's share of the budget and personnel hours is spent on acquisition. In most modern seismic surveys, acquisition involves hundreds of specialized personnel working for months or years. Seismic acquisition also must overcome potential liabilities and health, safety, and environmental concerns that rival facility, pipeline, construction, and other operational risks. As only properly acquired data can contribute effectively to processing and interpretation strategies, a great deal of importance is placed on acquisition quality. Arguably, many of the advances the seismic industry has experienced find their origin arising from advances in acquisition techniques. Full-waveform inversion (FWI), for example, can reach its full potential only when seismic acquisition has provided both low frequencies and long offsets.


2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 904
Author(s):  
Laurence Letki ◽  
Matt Lamont ◽  
Troy Thompson

The amount of available data to help us characterise the subsurface is ever increasing. Large seismic surveys, long offsets, multi- and full-azimuth datasets, including 3D and 4D, marine, ocean-bottom nodes and extremely high fold land surveys, are now common. In parallel, computing power is also increasing and, in combination with better data, this enables us to develop better tools and to use better physics to build models of the subsurface. Wave-equation based techniques, such as full waveform inversion (FWI), have therefore become a lot more practical. FWI uses the entire wavefield, including refractions and reflections, primaries and multiples, to generate a refined, high resolution Earth model. This technique is now commonly used at lower frequencies (up to 12 Hz) to derive more accurate models for improved seismic imaging and reduced depth conversion uncertainty. By including higher frequencies in FWI, we can attempt to resolve for finer and finer details. FWI models using the entire bandwidth of the seismic data constitute an interpretation product in itself, with applications in both structural interpretation and reservoir characterisation. Incorporating more physics within the FWI implementation, combined with modern supercomputer facilities, promises to increase the focus on very high frequency FWI in the coming years. In this paper, through a series of field examples, we illustrate the applications and rewards of high frequency FWI: from improved imaging, improved quantitative interpretation and depth conversion to a direct interpretation of the FWI models.


2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 296-296
Author(s):  
Andrew Geary

The following is an excerpt from SEG's podcast, Seismic Soundoff. In this episode, host Andrew Geary previews Dave Monk's upcoming Distinguished Instructor Short Course and book titled, “Survey design and seismic acquisition for land, marine, and in-between in light of new technology and techniques.” In this engaging conversation, Dave and Andrew discuss how full-waveform inversion impacts survey design, the research breakthroughs needed for the next evolution of seismic surveys, and one group that may not realize that this course is for them. Listen to the full episode at https://seg.org/podcast/post/8946 .


Geophysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-60
Author(s):  
Wei Zhou ◽  
David Lumley

Full waveform inversion (FWI) can be applied to time-lapse (4D) seismic data for subsurface reservoir monitoring. However, non-repeatability (NR) issues can contaminate the data and cause artifacts in the estimation of 4D rock and fluid property changes. Therefore, evaluating and studying the NR effects on the 4D data and FWI results can help, for instance, discriminate inversion artifacts from true changes, guide seismic survey design and processing workflow. Using realistic reservoir models, data and field measurements of NR, we show the effects of NR source-receiver position and seawater velocity changes on the data and the 4D FWI results. We find that ignoring these NR effects in the inversion can cause strong artifacts in the estimated velocity change models, and thus should be addressed before or during inversion. The NR source-receiver positioning issue can be addressed by 4D FWI successfully, whereas the NR water velocity issue requires measurements or estimations of water velocities. Furthermore, we compare the accuracy and robustness of the parallel, double-difference and central-difference 4D FWI methods to realistic NR ocean-bottom node data in a quantitative way. Parallel 4D FWI fails to capture geomechanical changes and also overestimates the aquifer layer changes with NR data. Double-difference 4D FWI is capable of recovering the geomechanical changes, but is also sensitive to NR noises, generating more artifacts in the overburden. By averaging the forward and reverse bootstrap 4D estimates, central-difference 4D FWI is more robust to NR noises, and also produces the most accurate 4D estimates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document