scholarly journals Axillary pacemaker generator implantation and direct axillary vein puncture on the infected side for a pacemaker infection on the opposite side to an arteriovenous fistula in a dialysis patient

2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (10) ◽  
pp. 505-511
Author(s):  
Mahito Noro ◽  
Kazuhiro Shimizu ◽  
Takahiro Nakagami ◽  
Hiroshi Mikamo ◽  
Hajime Kiyokawa ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
pp. 112972982092608
Author(s):  
Mitsutoshi Shindo ◽  
Kenichi Oguchi ◽  
Chihiro Kimikawa ◽  
Kiyonori Ito ◽  
Jyunki Morino ◽  
...  

Vascular access is necessary for hemodialysis, and in some cases where it is difficult to establish an arteriovenous fistula or arteriovenous graft, a permanent hemodialysis catheter may be used. However, serious catheter-related complications, such as central vein stenosis or thrombosis, can occur. We herein present a case of complete brachiocephalic vein obstruction in a patient with lupus nephritis receiving hemodialysis using a tunneled hemodialysis catheter. A 64-year-old patient underwent maintenance hemodialysis while taking an anticoagulant, with a tunneled hemodialysis catheter in the right internal jugular vein, because of arteriovenous fistula failure when hemodialysis was introduced. However, the catheter was removed because of a catheter-related bloodstream infection. Following the administration of antibiotics, an arteriovenous graft was implanted between the brachial artery and axillary vein in the right arm. Surprisingly, arteriovenous graft failure and complete obstruction of the right brachiocephalic vein were observed 3 days after arteriovenous graft creation. In conclusion, we report the case of tunneled hemodialysis catheter-related complete obstruction of the right brachiocephalic vein in a lupus nephritis patient undergoing hemodialysis. Clinicians should be aware of this potential complication when tunneled hemodialysis catheters are used and consider the next vascular access type before a tunneled hemodialysis catheter has been indwelled for the long term.


2003 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 224-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.üseyin Çaksen ◽  
Dursun Odabaş ◽  
Şükrü Arslan ◽  
Ali Kaya

2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. e125
Author(s):  
Min-seob Kim ◽  
Sanghyun Ahn ◽  
Hyejin Mo ◽  
Ahram Han ◽  
Chanjoong Choi ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuichi Sato ◽  
Masahito Miyamoto ◽  
Masahiko Yazawa ◽  
Ryuto Nakazawa ◽  
Hideo Sasaki ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (225) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Man Karmacharya ◽  
Satish Vaidya ◽  
Amit Kumar Singh ◽  
Sushil Dahal ◽  
Prasesh Dhakal ◽  
...  

Introduction: Arteriovenous fistulas are a preferred choice for hemodialysis access in chronickidney disease patients. There is increased adoption of arteriovenous fistula creation in Nepal.Our objective is to study various arteriovenous fistulas that have been created in our center. Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in a tertiary care hospital includingall cases of arteriovenous fistula creation from January 2018 to December 2019. We obtained theethical clearance from the institutional review committee of Kathmandu University School ofMedical sciences. Convenient sampling method was used. Detailed vascular mapping and colordoppler ultrasonography was done in the bilateral upper limb as preoperative preparation and tochoose a site for arteriovenous fistula creation. Data were entered into the Statistical Package for theSocial Sciences version 20 for analysis. Results: Among 50 patients, the most common location was brachiobasilic 20 (40%) patients followedby brachiocephalic 18 (36%), radiocephalic 11 (22%), and arteriovenous graft between the brachialartery and axillary vein 1 (2%). The mean duration of hospital stay was 1.44 days. Three (6%) patientsrequired re-intervention, all within 24 hours. Two (4%) patients had a failure of arteriovenous fistularequiring the creation of a new arteriovenous fistula. Conclusions: Brachiobasilic was the most common location for arteriovenous fistula creation.Reintervention was not common.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 80-83
Author(s):  
Kanyu Miyamoto ◽  
Naoya Matsuoka ◽  
Sumihisa Ono ◽  
Shinya Nakamura ◽  
Kohei Nagaya ◽  
...  

Introduction: We report a case in which we performed an anastomotic part septal formation surgery (anastoplasty) and artificial blood vessel replacement surgery. Case Description: When forearm arteriovenous fistula occlusion of a dialysis patient was observed, there was a thrombus in the vein of the whole forearm from the anastomotic part. We performed a septum formation surgery to suppress the blood flow in the vein near the anastomotic site, and artificial blood vessel replacement was performed on the high stenosis of the cephalic vein of the elbow. Postoperative blood flow was stable and hemodialysis was possible. Although there are various blood flow suppression methods for suppressing excessive blood flow, we report a case in which an anastomotic part septal formation surgery and artificial blood vessel replacement to secure an outflow passage were performed at the same time. Conclusion: Anastoplasty for excessive blood flow is considered to be an effective means in this case.


Nephron ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 278-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pietro Cozzupoli ◽  
Riccardo Mazzitelli ◽  
Carlo Catalano ◽  
Quirino Maggiore

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 391-391
Author(s):  
Arzu Kahveci ◽  
Ebru Asicioglu ◽  
Hakki Arikan ◽  
Faysal Dane ◽  
Mustafa Aras ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document