scholarly journals Fluoride release and recharge abilities of contemporary fluoride-containing restorative materials and dental adhesives

2013 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 296-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios DIONYSOPOULOS ◽  
Eugenia KOLINIOTOU-KOUMPIA ◽  
Maria HELVATZOGLOU-ANTONIADES ◽  
Nikolaos KOTSANOS
2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 410-410
Author(s):  
Dimitrios DIONYSOPOULOS ◽  
Eugenia KOLINIOTOU-KOUMPIA ◽  
Maria HELVATZOGLOU-ANTONIADES ◽  
Nikolaos KOTSANOS

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-381
Author(s):  
Katarina Kelić ◽  
Matej Par ◽  
Kristina Peroš ◽  
Ivana Šutej ◽  
Zrinka Tarle

Objective: To determine the effect of two adhesive systems and a glass ionomer coating resin on fluoride release and concurrent pH changes over a period of 168 days. Material and methods: Four restorative materials were investigated: a giomer Beautiful II, an “alkasite” material Cention, a conventional composite Filtek Z250, and a glass ionomer cement Fuji IX Extra. Light-cured composite specimens were coated using G-aenial Bond and Clearfil Universal Bond Quick. Glass ionomer specimens were coated using GC Fuji Coat LC. Uncoated specimens were used as references. Quantitative fluoride release and pH changes were measured after 1 h, 24 h, 2 days, 7 days, 28 days, 84 days, and 168 days. Results: The cumulative fluoride release after 168 days increased for uncoated specimens in the following order: Filtek Z250 < Beautifil II < Cention < Fuji IX Extra. A comparatively lower fluoride release was measured for the composites coated with Clearfil Universal Bond Quick, with cumulative values after 168 days increasing in the following order: Filtek Z250 < Beautifil II < Cention. The composites coated with G-aenial Bond showed lower fluoride release compared to the uncoated specimens, with cumulative values increasing in the following order: Filtek Z250 < Beautifil II < Cention. The composites coated with G-aenial Bond showed pH values in the acidic range (4.4- 5.7) after 1 h and 24 h. Conclusion: Fluoride release varied among the investigated restorative materials and depended on the use of dental adhesives and coatings. The pH of all materials, coating types and time points varied.


2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 1243-1248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar T. Al-Naimi ◽  
Toshiyuki Itota ◽  
Ross S. Hobson ◽  
John F. McCabe

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 309-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kélio Garcia Silva ◽  
Denise Pedrini ◽  
Alberto Carlos Botazzo Delbem ◽  
Mark Cannon

This study evaluated the surface microhardness and fluoride release of 5 restorative materials - Ketac-Fil Plus, Vitremer, Fuji II LC, Freedom and Fluorofil - in two storage media: distilled/deionized water and a pH-cycling (pH 4.6). Twelve specimens of each material, were fabricated and the initial surface microhardness (ISM) was determined in a Shimadzu HMV-2000 microhardness tester (static load Knoop). The specimens were submitted to 6- or 18-h cycles in the tested media. The solutions were refreshed at the end of each cycle. All solutions were stored for further analysis. After 15-day storage, the final surface microhardness (FSM) and fluoride release were measured. Fluoride dose was measured with a fluoride-specific electrode (Orion 9609-BN) and digital ion analyzer (Orion 720 A). The variables ISM, FSM and fluoride release were analyzed statistically by analysis of variance and Tukey's test (p<0.05). There was significant difference in FSM between the storage media for Vitremer (pH 4.6 = 40.2 ± 1.5; water = 42.6 ± 1.4), Ketac-Fil Plus (pH 4.6 = 73.4 ± 2.7; water = 58.2 ± 1.3) and Fluorofil (pH 4.6 = 44.3 ± 1.8; water = 38.4 ± 1.0). Ketac-Fil Plus (9.9 ± 18.0) and Fluorofil (4.4 ± 1.3) presented higher fluoride release in water, whereas Vitremer (7.4 ± 7.1), Fuji II LC (5.7 ± 4.7) and Freedom (2.1 ± 1.7) had higher fluoride release at pH 4.6. Microhardness and fluoride release of the tested restorative materials varied according to the storage medium.


2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 406-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosa Maria Viana de Bragança Garcez ◽  
Marília Afonso Rabelo Buzalaf ◽  
Paulo Amarante de Araújo

Experimed ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 7-15
Author(s):  
Belen Şirinoğlu-Çapan ◽  
Serap Akyüz ◽  
Burçin Alev ◽  
Beste Tacal-Aslan ◽  
Tanju Kadir ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 815-823 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alicja Porenczuk ◽  
Bartłomiej Jankiewicz ◽  
Magdalena Naurecka ◽  
Bartosz Bartosewicz ◽  
Bartosz Sierakowski ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document