scholarly journals A New Method for the Evaluation of the Wear of Restorative Materials on Class V Cavity

1988 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 206-216,234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Jyh ROU ◽  
Po-In CHANG ◽  
Yohji IMAI
Keyword(s):  
New Method ◽  
Class V ◽  
Restorative Materials

scholarly journals Effect of incorporation of nano-hydroxyapatite particles on the clinical performance of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in class V cavities: split-mouth, randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeinab M. Zaki ◽  
Maha A. Niazy ◽  
Mohamed H. Zaazou ◽  
Shaymaa M. Nagi ◽  
Dina W. Elkassas
Keyword(s):  
Surface Texture ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Class V ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Significant Change ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare the clinical performance of Nano-hydroxyapatite-modified conventional glass ionomer cement (NHA-GIC) and Nano-hydroxyapatite-modified resin-modified glass ionomer cement (NHA-RMGIC) with conventional glass ionomer (CGIC) and resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGIC) in the treatment of caries class V cavities. Sixty patients with at least two cervical caries lesions participated in this study. A total of 120 class V cavities were prepared and then restored using different restorative materials. Restorations were clinically evaluated according to modified United States Public Health Service criteria at baseline and after 3, 6 and 9 months. Results There was no statistically significant difference in the clinical performance of the different restorative materials at any of the follow-up periods. However, throughout the study period there was a statistically significant change in the color match, surface texture and marginal integrity in NHA-GIC. A statistically significant change in the surface texture and marginal integrity was found in GIC. On the other hand, there was only a statistically significant change in surface texture in NHA-RMGIC. Conclusions All tested restorative materials, control (CGIC and RMGIC) as well as experimental (NHA-GIC and NHA-RMGIC), exhibited comparable clinical performance after 9 months follow-up.

Comparison of Wear-Resistance of Class V Restorative Materials

1998 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 309-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
KEVIN B. FRAZIER ◽  
FREDERICK A. RUEGGEBERG ◽  
DONALD J. METTENBURG
Keyword(s):  
Wear Resistance ◽  
Class V ◽  
Restorative Materials

scholarly journals Investigation of microleakage of polymerized with LED and halogen light devices four different restorative materials

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 73-79
Author(s):  
Ayşe Günay ◽  
Emin Caner Tümen
Keyword(s):  
Pediatric Dentistry ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Primary Molar ◽  
Class V ◽  
Led Light ◽  
Halogen Light ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Native Speakers Of English ◽  
In Vitro Effects

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro effects on microleakage of LED and halogen light devices used in the polymerization of monomer structure composite resins of different viscosities and inorganic filling particle size applied to standard class V cavities in primary teeth. Methodology: 80 non caries primary molar teeth with standard class v cavity on the buccal surfaces were used. The teeth were randomly divided into 4 main groups and restored with composite resins (Herculite® XRV, Ultra™, Filtek™ Silorane, Vertise™ Flow, Æliteflo™). Each group was divided into 2 sub-groups for polymerization with LED or halogen light devices. Following the thermal cycle and subsequent procedures, the dye penetration method was used to evaluate microleakage. The microleakage scores were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests. Results: According to the results of the statistical analysis, in polymerization made with halogen and LED light devices at the occlusal edge, the microleakage scores from lowest to highest were as follows: Filtek™ Silorane < Herculite® XRV Ultra™ < Æliteflo™ < Vertise™ Flow. In polymerization made with halogen and LED light devices at the gingival edge, the microleakage scores from lowest to highest were as follows: Filtek™ Silorane < Herculite® XRV Ultr™ < Vertise™ Flow < Æliteflo™. Conclusion: In the polymerizations made by using LED and halogen light devices, Herculite® XRV Ultra™, was found to be successful as it showed similar values to Filtek™ Silorane, which gave the best results in terms of microleakage. Moreover, as we have reached similar findings in our thesis study in respect of microleakage, in cases indicating the use of flow composite resin materials such as Æliteflo™, Vertise™ Flow can be used as it has the advantage of ease application and thus provide an ideal alternative in pediatric dentistry.   How to cite this article: Günay A, Tümen EC. Investigation of microleakage of polymerized with LED and halogen light devices four different restorative materials. Int Dent Res 2020;10(3):73-9. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no3.2   Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.

scholarly journals Study the effect of surface sealant on microleakage in class V cavities filled by different restorative materials

2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-156
Author(s):  
Niaz H. Ghareeb H.Saeed ◽  
◽  
Gollshang Ahmad Mhammed ◽  
Hawzheen Masoud Mohamad ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Class V ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Surface Sealant ◽  
Effect Of Surface

Direct Restorative Material Use of Selected Practitioners in the United Kingdom

2002 ◽  
Vol os9 (4) ◽  
pp. 133-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A Brunton ◽  
Reinhard Hickel ◽  
Nairn HF Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Resin Composite ◽  
Postal Questionnaire ◽  
Class I ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Cervical Lesions ◽  
Class V ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Materials Used

Purpose of the Investigation To investigate, by questionnaire, the direct restorative materials used by a sample of practitioners from the Unite d Kingdom. Basic Procedures A postal questionnaire was distributed to a group of self-selected practitioners, who volunteered to participate in the study. In all 110 practitioners participated in the study. Main Findings The most used material for the restoration of occlusal (Class I) and approximal (Class II) lesions was amalgam with 61% and 73% of practitioners indicating that they used amalgam in this situation. Adhesive tooth-coloured materials, specifically composites and compomers, were preferred by the majority of practitioners for anterior approximal (Class III) and incisal (Class IV) restorations with compomer preferred for Class V restorations including non-carious cervical lesions and for the restoration of primary teeth. Principal Conclusions It is concluded that the general practitioners surveyed in this study tend to use amalgam for the restoration of Class I and II lesions as opposed to resin composite. The majority of practitioners in this study used compomers, a relatively new group of restorative materials, with little evidence of traditional glass-ionomer cements being used routinely.

Leakage Pathway of Different Nano-Restorative Materials in Class V Cavities Prepared by Er:YAG Laser and Bur Preparation

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 783-789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emre Ozel ◽  
Yonca Korkmaz ◽  
Nuray Attar ◽  
Ceren Ozge Bicer ◽  
Erhan Firatli
Keyword(s):  
Er:Yag Laser ◽  
Class V ◽  
Restorative Materials
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document