Interprofessional and Interdisciplinary Learning

Author(s):  
Steve Smith ◽  
Lynn Clouder

This chapter begins by considering the words used to discuss collaborative education. Although it can be argued that “practice” separates “a profession” from “a discipline”, the merit in separating theory from practice is highly questionable. The literature suggests that the challenges to interprofessional and interdisciplinary learning are very similar, for example, the “silo” mentality causes problems within both. In addition, it is evident that the reasons behind advocacy of interprofessional and interdisciplinary learning are also similar. The chapter demonstrates that successful interprofessional and interdisciplinary learning requires fundamental changes to both the curriculum and the organisation delivering it. The authors conclude that while subtle differences might exist between interprofessional and interdisciplinary learning their promotion is based on a similar rationale, which is to ensure that students are prepared for the real world in which collaboration, boundary crossing, adopting multiple perspectives and working with others to achieve optimal outcomes, is paramount.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 368-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masatoshi Kudo ◽  
Jean-Luc Raoul ◽  
Han Chu Lee ◽  
Ann-Lii Cheng ◽  
Keiko Nakajima ◽  
...  

368 Background: TACE is commonly used for patients (pts) with unresectable HCC, and appropriate pt selection is important to obtain optimal outcomes. However, there is no globally accepted consensus on unsuitability and refractoriness to TACE. Retrospective studies suggest that continuing TACE after refractoriness or failure is harmful and may cause pts to become ineligible for further treatments because of liver function deterioration. This exploratory analysis of OPTIMIS evaluated the real-world incidence of liver function deterioration by baseline liver characteristics after first TACE. Methods: OPTIMIS enrolled 1670 pts with HCC for whom a decision to treat with TACE was made at the time of study entry. Liver function deterioration was defined as worsening of CTCAE grade compared with baseline for any of these parameters: aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total bilirubin, albumin, and prothrombin international normalized ratio (INR). All analyses are descriptive. Results: A total of 977 pts received TACE. The incidence of liver deterioration was higher in pts with BCLC stage C vs stage B (52% vs 44%, respectively), in pts exceeding the up-to-7 criteria compared with those within (49% vs 43%, respectively), and in those deemed unsuitable for TACE at baseline versus those deemed eligible (53% vs 44%, respectively) (Table). Conclusions: Deterioration of liver function parameters was observed after TACE in pts with HCC in the real-world setting. Therefore, appropriate pt selection for TACE and preserving liver function are important to optimize the benefit of TACE and subsequent treatments. Clinical trial information: NCT01933945. [Table: see text]


2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 100-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne K. Bothe

This article presents some streamlined and intentionally oversimplified ideas about educating future communication disorders professionals to use some of the most basic principles of evidence-based practice. Working from a popular five-step approach, modifications are suggested that may make the ideas more accessible, and therefore more useful, for university faculty, other supervisors, and future professionals in speech-language pathology, audiology, and related fields.


2006 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 47
Author(s):  
LEE SAVIO BEERS
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence A. Cunningham
Keyword(s):  

1976 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 303-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold M. Proshansky

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document