Left Atrial Volume and Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation after Aortic Valve Replacement

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Madhu Reddy Yeruva ◽  
Ruby Satpathy ◽  
Xuedong Shen ◽  
Mark Holmberg ◽  
Claire Hunter ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 378-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rasmus Carter-Storch ◽  
Jordi S Dahl ◽  
Nicolaj L Christensen ◽  
Redi Pecini ◽  
Eva V Søndergård ◽  
...  

AbstractOBJECTIVESPostoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication following cardiac surgery. However, knowledge on the rate of long-term atrial fibrillation (LTAF) after POAF remains unclear. We investigated predictors of POAF in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement, and assessed the rate of LTAF during follow-up.METHODSWe prospectively included 96 adult patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement. Patients with previous atrial fibrillation (AF) were excluded. Patients underwent echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging immediately prior to surgery. Surgical aortic clamp time and postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) were documented. POAF was defined as AF recorded within 7 days of surgery. Through chart review, patients were followed up for documented episodes of LTAF occurring more than 7 days after surgery.RESULTSPOAF occurred in 51 patients (53%). It was associated with larger preoperative echocardiographic left atrial volume index (44 ± 12 vs 37 ± 8 ml/m2, P = 0.004), longer aortic clamp time [80 (70–102) vs 72 (62–65) min, P = 0.04] and higher CRP on first postoperative day [80 (64–87) vs 65 (44–83) mg/l, P = 0.001]. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that left atrial volume index [odds ratio (OR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.13; P = 0.005] and postoperative CRP (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01–1.05; P = 0.006) were the only independent predictors of POAF. During 695 days (25th–75th percentile: 498–859 days) of follow-up, LTAF occurred in 11 patients of whom 10 were in the POAF group (hazard ratio 9.4, 95% CI 1.2–74; P = 0.03).CONCLUSIONSPOAF is predicted by left atrial volume index and postoperative CRP. Patients with POAF have a 9-fold increase risk of developing symptomatic LTAF during follow-up.Clinical trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02316587).


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Hozumi ◽  
J Morimoto ◽  
T Nishi ◽  
K Takemoto ◽  
S Fujita ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Recently, we have reported that large left atrial volume (minimum left atrial volume index : LAVImin ≥30ml/m²) at end-diastole determined by direct exposure of left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic pressure can predict post-operative symptomatic status after aortic valve replacement (AVR) in aortic stenosis (AS) patients with high sensitivity and modest specificity. Reverse remodeling of large LAVImin after AVR may contribute to false positive for the prediction of post-operative symptomatic status in patients with AS. Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate relationship between post-operative symptomatic status and reverse remodeling of large LAVImin in patients with AS who underwent AVR. Methods The study population consisted of 75 patients with AS who underwent AVR and were followed up for 600 days after AVR, after the exclusion of the followings; atrial fibrillation, significant coronary artery disease, significant mitral valve disease, pacemaker rhythm, and inadequate echocardiographic images. We measured LAVImin by biplane Simpson"s method before and after AVR. Preoperative large LAVImin (≥30ml/m²) according to the previous study was observed in 32 (43%) of 75 patients. We divided these 32 patients into two groups according to the post-operative symptomatic status during the follow-up period. Results There was no significant difference in pre-operative LAVImin between patients with and without post-operative symptom (46.5 ± 13.4 vs 40.4 ± 8.6 ml/m²). On the other hand, post-operative LAVImin in patients without post-operative symptom was significantly smaller than that in patients with post-operative symptom (31.5 ± 8.6 vs 54.8 ± 14.0 ml/m², p < 0.01). While significant regression in LAVImin after AVR was observed in patients without post-operative symptom (40.4 ± 8.6 to 31.5 ± 8.6 ml/m², p < 0.05), no regression in LAVImin after AVR was observed in patients with post-operative symptom (46.5 ± 13.4 to 54.8 ± 14.0 ml/m²). Conclusions Reverse remodeling of large LAVmin in patients with AS who underwent AVR was observed in post-operative asymptomatic group, but not in symptomatic group. These results suggest that reverse remodeling of large LAVImin after AVR could contribute to the post-operative asymptomatic status in patients with AS who underwent AVR.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. S55-S56
Author(s):  
Jeong Won Choi ◽  
Kwame Bodor-Tsia Atsina ◽  
Benjamin Ray Stripe ◽  
Matthew Lam ◽  
Jesse John Goitia ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed E. Taha ◽  
Ammar Eljack ◽  
Hisham Ibrahim ◽  
Chanwit Roongsritong

The left atrial thrombus is a well-known complication of atrial fibrillation and rheumatic mitral valve disease and carries a high risk for systemic thromboembolism. They are generally dissolved after a certain period of optimal anticoagulation. A large thrombus, on the other hand, may persist even with adequate anticoagulation. The surgical removal of a thrombus theoretically poses some risk of systemic embolization, making its management a clinical dilemma. Furthermore, a refractory thrombus is uncommon. Thus, an evidence-based guideline in selecting the optimal therapy is needed. We report a case of a 74-year-old male with atrial fibrillation and a history of unprovoked pulmonary embolism who was incidentally found to have a massive left atrial thrombus shortly after discontinuing warfarin about 4 months following bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. The thrombus was refractory to anticoagulation posing a clinical management dilemma. This case is interesting in terms of presentation and the approach to diagnosis and treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document