Finite Element Analysis of the Stress Intensity Factor and the Residual Stress by Cold Expansion Method in CT Specimen

2006 ◽  
pp. 711-715
Author(s):  
Jae Soon Jang ◽  
Cheol Kim ◽  
Myoung Rae Cho ◽  
Won Ho Yang
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Stress Intensity Factor ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Intensity Factor ◽  
Expansion Method ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Cold Expansion

Finite Element Analysis of the Stress Intensity Factor and the Residual Stress by Cold Expansion Method in CT Specimen

2006 ◽  
Vol 321-323 ◽  
pp. 711-715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Soon Jang ◽  
Cheol Kim ◽  
Myoung Rae Cho ◽  
Won Ho Yang
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Stress Intensity Factor ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Intensity Factor ◽  
Crack Initiation ◽  
Crack Growth ◽  
Expansion Method ◽  
Expansion Ratio ◽  
Cold Expansion

Cold expansion method retards the crack initiation due to the compressive residual stress developed on a hole surface. Most previous researches have shown only the beneficial distribution of residual stresses in the retardation of the crack initiation at the stress concentration area. Also, there have been only few studies on the relation between crack growth and residual stress around other adjacent holes. A few fastener holes of aircraft structures is a shot distance which is less than 20mm between holes. The purpose of this study is to provide better understanding of the residual stress effect around a hole in a structure as crack growth starts from another hole. By finite element method, this study showed that residual stress in a CT specimen is redistributed by cold expansion process and that tensile stress increases in proportion to the cold expansion ratio in the vicinity of the crack. Stress intensity factor increases as the cold expansion ratio increases.

Fracture Mechanics Fatigue Evaluation of a Flowline Clamp Connector Using Finite Element Modeling of a Crack

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Curtis Sifford ◽  
Ali Shirani
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Stress Intensity Factor ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Fatigue Life ◽  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Intensity Factor ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Crack Tip ◽  
Element Analysis

Abstract This paper presents the application of the rules from ASME Section VIII, Division 3 of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code for a fracture mechanics evaluation to determine the damage tolerance and fatigue life of a flowline clamp connector. The guidelines from API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1 Fitness-For-Service for the stress analysis of a crack-like flaw have been considered for this assessment. The crack tip is modeled using a refined mesh around the crack tip that is referred to as a focused mesh approach in API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1. The driving force method is used as an alternative to the failure assessment diagram method to account for the influence of crack tip plasticity. The J integral is determined using elastic-plastic finite element analysis and converted to an equivalent stress intensity factor to be compared to the fracture toughness of the material. The fatigue life is calculated using the Paris Law equation and the stress intensity factor calculated from the finite element analysis. The allowable number of design cycles is determined using the safety factors required from Division 3 of the ASME Pressure Vessel Code.

Fracture Mechanics Fatigue Evaluation of a Flowline Clamp Connector Using Finite Element Modeling of a Crack

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Curtis Sifford ◽  
Ali Shirani
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Stress Intensity Factor ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Fatigue Life ◽  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Intensity Factor ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Crack Tip ◽  
Element Analysis

This paper presents the application of the rules from ASME Section VIII, Division 3 of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code for a fracture mechanics evaluation to determine the damage tolerance and fatigue life of a flowline clamp connector. The guidelines from API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1 Fitness-For-Service for the stress analysis of a crack-like flaw have been considered for this assessment. The crack tip is modeled using a refined mesh around the crack tip that is referred to as a focused mesh approach in API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1. The driving force method is used as an alternative to the failure assessment diagram method to account for the influence of crack tip plasticity. The J integral is determined using elastic-plastic finite element analysis and converted to an equivalent stress intensity factor to be compared to the fracture toughness of the material. The fatigue life is calculated using the Paris Law equation and the stress intensity factor calculated from the finite element analysis. The allowable number of design cycles is determined using the safety factors required from Division 3 of the ASME Pressure Vessel Code.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document