Effects of Surface Treatment and Loading Speed on Adhesive Strength of Aluminum to Polycarbonate Lap Joints

2004 ◽  
Vol 261-263 ◽  
pp. 405-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Do Won Seo ◽  
Ho Chel Yoon ◽  
J.Y. Lee ◽  
Jae Kyoo Lim

The bonding strength of adhesive joints is influenced by the surface roughness of the joining parts. However, the magnitude of the influence has not yet been clarified because of the complexity of the phenomena. In this study, it is showed that surface treatment affects adhesive strength and durability of aluminum/polycarbonate single-lap joints, and loading speed affects tensile-shear strength of adhesive joints. To evaluate the effect of surface treatments on the adhesive strength, several surface treatment methods are used, that is, cleaning, grinding, SiC polishing and sand blasting. It is showed that an optimum value of the surface roughness exists with respect to the tensile-shear strength of adhesive joints. The adhesive strength shows linear relationship with the surface roughness and loading speed. And the mechanical removal of disturbing films of lubricants, impurities and oxides make adhesive strength increase significantly.

2016 ◽  
Vol 93 (8) ◽  
pp. 613-625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaohong Zhan ◽  
Jicheng Chen ◽  
Cheng Gu ◽  
Qingyu Peng ◽  
Jie Chen ◽  
...  

Holzforschung ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Stöckel ◽  
Johannes Konnerth ◽  
Wolfgang Kantner ◽  
Johann Moser ◽  
Wolfgang Gindl

Abstract The tensile shear strength of veneer lap joints was characterised. The joints were produced with an Automated Bonding Evaluation System (ABES) using urea-formaldehyde (UF) as well as melamine-urea-formaldehyde (MUF) adhesive formulated for particleboard production. At a fixed heating temperature of 110°C, a systematic increase in bond strength was observed for both adhesives with increasing cure time. The absolute bond strength was significantly higher for MUF compared to UF. Nanoindentation experiments with the same specimens used for ABES revealed a very hard, stiff and brittle character of the UF resin, whereas the MUF proved significantly less hard and stiff, and less brit-tle. Wood cell walls in contact with adhesive, i.e., where adhesive penetration into the cell wall was assumed, showed significantly altered mechanical properties. Such cell walls were harder, stiffer and more brittle than unaffected reference cell walls. These effects were slightly more pronounced for UF than for MUF. Comparing UF and MUF, the micro-mechanical properties of cured adhesive and interphase cell walls confirm earlier observations that tougher adhesives can lead to higher macroscopic bond strength. In strong contrast to that, no obvious correlation was found between micromechanical properties and the strong cure time dependence of macroscopic bond strength.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-229
Author(s):  
Seiji FURUSAKO ◽  
Yasunobu MIYAZAKI ◽  
Yoshiaki AKINIWA

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 838-846 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seiji Furusako ◽  
Yasunobu Miyazaki ◽  
Yoshiaki Akiniwa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document