The Weighted Burgers Vector: A Quantity for Constraining Dislocation Densities and Types Using Electron Backscatter Diffraction on 2D Sections through Crystalline Materials

2012 ◽  
Vol 715-716 ◽  
pp. 732-736 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Wheeler ◽  
Elisabetta Mariani ◽  
Sandra Piazolo ◽  
David J. Prior ◽  
P.J. Trimby ◽  
...  

The Weighted Burgers Vector (WBV) is defined as the sum, over all types of dislocations, of [(density of intersections of dislocation lines with a map) x (Burgers vector)]. It can be calculated, for any crystal system, solely from orientation gradients in a map view, unlike the full dislocation density tensor, which requires gradients in the third dimension. No assumption is made about gradients in the third dimension and they may be non-zero. The only assumption involved is that elastic strains are small so the lattice distortion is entirely due to dislocations. Orientation gradients can be estimated from gridded orientation measurements obtained by EBSD mapping, so the WBV can be calculated as a vector field on an EBSD map. The magnitude of the WBV gives a lower bound on the magnitude of the dislocation density tensor when that magnitude is defined in a coordinate invariant way. The direction of the WBV can constrain the types of Burgers vectors of geometrically necessary dislocations present in the microstructure, most clearly when it is broken down in terms of lattice vectors. The WBV has five advantages over other measures of local lattice distortion. 1. It is a vector and hence carries more information than any scalar measure of local misorientation. 2. It has an explicit mathematical link to the individual Burgers vectors of dislocations. 3. Since it is derived via tensor calculus, it is not dependent on the map coordinate system, in contrast to existing measures of local misorientation which are not only scalar but dependent on the coordinate system used. 4. Calculation involves no assumptions about energy minimisation. 5. The numerical differentiation involved in calculating the WBV may introduce errors, but there is a direct mathematical link to a contour integral. The net Burgers vector content of dislocations intersecting an area of a map can be simply calculated by an integration round the edge of that area, a method which is fast and complements point-by-point WBV calculations. Errors in orientation measurement will have a much smaller effect here, and dislocations can be detected which are otherwise lost in the noise of any local calculation.

2008 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 035408 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Kioseoglou ◽  
G P Dimitrakopulos ◽  
Ph Komninou ◽  
Th Karakostas ◽  
E C Aifantis

The classical theory of continuous distributions of dislocations has traditionally focused on the Burgers’ vectors and the dislocation density tensor as descriptions of defectiveness. We prove that, generally, there is an infinite number of tensor densities with similarly descriptive properties, and that there is a functional basis for this list which strictly includes the Burgers’ vectors and dislocation density. Moreover the changes of state which preserve these densities turn out to represent slip in certain surfaces associated with crystal geometry, so that the basic mechanism of plasticity emerges naturally from abstract ideas which neither anticipate nor involve the kinematics of particular types of crystal defects.


2008 ◽  
Vol 1130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Deng ◽  
Anter El-Azab ◽  
B.C. Larson

ABSTRACTThe statistics of internal elastic fields and dislocation density tensor associated with arbitrary 3D dislocation distributions have been modeled using probability density function and pair correlations. Numerical results for these quantities have been obtained for dislocation structures generated by the method of dislocation dynamics simulation.


Author(s):  
Bohua Sun

This letter attempts to clarify an issue regarding the proper definition of plastic dislocation density tensor. This study shows that the Ortiz’s and Berdichevsky’s plastic dislocation density tensor are equivalent with each other, but not with Kondo’s one. To fix the problem, we propose a modified version of Kondo’s plastic dislocation density tensor.


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (09) ◽  
pp. 1460034 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marek Z. Elżanowski ◽  
Serge Preston

We analyze some aspects of the kinematic theory of non-uniformly defective elastic crystals. Concentrating on the problem of identifying continuous defective lattices possessing the given defectiveness, as defined by the dislocation density tensor, we investigate the relation between the dislocation density tensor and the Lie algebra of vector fields associated with a defective lattice.


1999 ◽  
Vol 595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen A. Dunn ◽  
Susan E. Babcock ◽  
Donald S. Stone ◽  
Richard J. Matyi ◽  
Ling Zhang ◽  
...  

AbstractDiffraction-contrast TEM, focused probe electron diffraction, and high-resolution X-ray diffraction were used to characterize the dislocation arrangements in a 16[.proportional]m thick coalesced GaN film grown by MOVPE LEO. As is commonly observed, the threading dislocations that are duplicated from the template above the window bend toward (0001). At the coalescence plane they bend back to lie along [0001] and thread to the surface. In addition, three other sets of dislocations were observed. The first set consists of a wall of parallel dislocations lying in the coalescence plane and nearly parallel to the substrate, with Burgers vector (b) in the (0001) plane. The second set is comprised of rectangular loops with b = 1/3 [11 20] (perpendicular to the coalescence boundary) which originate in the coalescence boundary and extend laterally into the film on the (1 100). The third set of dislocations threads laterally through the film along the [1 100] bar axis with 1/3<11 20>-type Burgers vectors These sets result in a dislocation density of ∼109 cm−2. High resolution X-ray reciprocal space maps indicate wing tilt of ∼0.5°.


Author(s):  
Bohua Sun

This letter attempts to clarify an issue regarding the proper definition of plastic dislocation density tensor. This study shows that the Ortiz&rsquo;s and Berdichevsky&rsquo;s plastic dislocation density tensor are equivalent with each other, but not with Kondo&rsquo;s one. To fix the problem, we propose a modified version of Kondo&rsquo;s plastic dislocation density tensor.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document