Regulating Access and Sustainable Development of Deep-Sea Minerals for the Benefit of All Humanity

2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 12-15
Author(s):  
Michael W. Lodge

Abstract Regulating access to and sustainable development of deep-seabed minerals for the benefit of all humanity is a gradual revolution that is changing the way humankind approaches global natural resources. The International Seabed Authority has the exclusive mandate to manage seabed minerals in the international seabed area (the Area) on behalf of humankind as a whole. It is putting in place legal and scientific solutions to reach the global, science-based and consensus-driven regulatory regime that will enable sustainable and equitable exploitation of the Area.

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Nur Cahyadi Cahyadi ◽  
Heru Baskoro Baskoro

Community empowerment in sustainable development will not be successful without citizens’ participation, both village officials, cadres and the community itself. Community empowerment is an effort to increase the community independency, both individually and in a group. The lack of knowledge and understanding the residence of Kedung Sumber Village, Balongpanggang, Gresik regarding the use of natural resources around them, encuorages this community empowerment program. Moringa Oleifera is a local resources that could be utilized in improving the welfare of the community. This community empowerment program introduces the way how to create some products using Moringa Oleifera. Some products than can be produced are ice cream, puding, and nugget. Therefore, this program is expected to increase the community independency, both individually and in a group.<br /><br />


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lestario Widodo

Regional outonomy that is meant as right, authority and obligatory of the district (kabupaten/kota) to regulateand manage their own governance and community’s interests gave pressure impacts to the environmentalsustainability since its implementation in 2001. The spirit to utilize natural resources from the districtarea tend to explore the environment irresponsibly which resulted in degradation of the environmentalsustainability. The district policies had often not been assessed in detail before implementation especiallytheir impacts to the environment. This caused the regional autonomy went into a different direction,therefore it needs an improvement in the level of program determination, policy and regulation applied, sothat the spirit to conduct decentralised governance will be kept on the rules of sustainable developmentwhich is environmentally friendly.Key words : Sustainable Development, Regional Autonomy


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adib Rifqi Setiawan

Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) empowers people to change the way they think and work towards a sustainable future.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Dickens ◽  
Vladimir Smakhtin ◽  
Matthew McCartney ◽  
Gordon O’Brien ◽  
Lula Dahir

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), are high on the agenda for most countries of the world. In its publication of the SDGs, the UN has provided the goals and target descriptions that, if implemented at a country level, would lead towards a sustainable future. The IAEG (InterAgency Expert Group of the SDGs) was tasked with disseminating indicators and methods to countries that can be used to gather data describing the global progress towards sustainability. However, 2030 Agenda leaves it to countries to adopt the targets with each government setting its own national targets guided by the global level of ambition but taking into account national circumstances. At present, guidance on how to go about this is scant but it is clear that the responsibility is with countries to implement and that it is actions at a country level that will determine the success of the SDGs. Reporting on SDGs by country takes on two forms: i) global reporting using prescribed indicator methods and data; ii) National Voluntary Reviews where a country reports on its own progress in more detail but is also able to present data that are more appropriate for the country. For the latter, countries need to be able to adapt the global indicators to fit national priorities and context, thus the global description of an indicator could be reduced to describe only what is relevant to the country. Countries may also, for the National Voluntary Review, use indicators that are unique to the country but nevertheless contribute to measurement of progress towards the global SDG target. Importantly, for those indicators that relate to the security of natural resources security (e.g., water) indicators, there are no prescribed numerical targets/standards or benchmarks. Rather countries will need to set their own benchmarks or standards against which performance can be evaluated. This paper presents a procedure that would enable a country to describe national targets with associated benchmarks that are appropriate for the country. The procedure builds on precedent set in other countries but in particular on a procedure developed for the setting of Resource Quality Objectives in South Africa. The procedure focusses on those SDG targets that are natural resource-security focused, for example, extent of water-related ecosystems (6.6), desertification (15.3) and so forth, because the selection of indicator methods and benchmarks is based on the location of natural resources, their use and present state and how they fit into national strategies.


2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cara Nine

Abstract:Up until now, political philosophy has explained the acquisition of natural resources, in one way or another, through the terms of human settlement. An agent acquires natural resources by moving into the geographic area that contains these resources. Even how we make claims to the ocean floor depends on settlement — claimants must be adjacent to settled land. This essay extends original acquisition theories so that they can respond to cases that do not presuppose any conditions of human settlement. I suggest that resource rights in the deep sea may be created, alternatively, through acts of compromise. Compromise can alleviate conflict, allowing for claimants to move beyond stalemate to acquire goods. It also allows for a large degree of flexibility in the specification of rights, and thereby can explain nontraditional rights over areas of migration. The tricky part of a theory that grants rights through agreement is explaining why external parties, those not part of the agreement, have a duty to respect those rights. A compromise under certain conditions, I argue, places all persons under a duty to respect the rights created by the compromise. Thus, when two parties compromise, they may acquire goods from the commons — creating a duty for all others to respect the parties’ rights over these goods. Importantly, rights created through compromise are constrained by a set of concerns for those excluded.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document