Critical Care Nurse Work Environments 2013: A Status Report

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 64-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth T. Ulrich ◽  
Ramón Lavandero ◽  
Dana Woods ◽  
Sean Early
Keyword(s):  
Job Satisfaction ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Work Environment ◽  
Critical Care Nurses ◽  
Work Environments ◽  
Care Nurse ◽  
Critical Care Nurse ◽  
Healthy Work ◽  
Nurse Work Environment

Background The health of critical care nurse work environments has been shown to affect patient care outcomes as well as the job satisfaction and retention of registered nurses. The American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN) Critical Care Nurse Work Environment Survey was first conducted in 2006 following the release of the AACN Standards for Establishing and Sustaining a Healthy Work Environment and was conducted again in 2008. This article reports the results of the third AACN Critical Care Nurse Work Environment Survey conducted in 2013. Objective To evaluate the current state of critical care nurse work environments. Methods A total of 8444 AACN members and constituents responded to an online survey. Results The overall health of critical care nurses’ work environments has declined since 2008, as have nurses’ perceptions of the quality of care. Respondents rated their overall work environment and factors associated with healthy work environments including quality of patient care, staffing, communication and collaboration, respect, physical and mental safety, moral distress, nursing leadership, support for certification and continuing education, meaningful recognition, job satisfaction, and career plans. Although some factors improved, declines in any factors are a concern. Conclusions An increasing body of evidence has shown relationships between healthy nurse work environments and patient outcomes. The results of this 2013 survey identified areas in which the health of critical care nurse work environments needs attention and care, requiring the relentless true collaboration of everyone involved.

scholarly journals Critical Care Nurse Work Environments 2018: Findings and Implications

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth Ulrich ◽  
Connie Barden ◽  
Linda Cassidy ◽  
Natasha Varn-Davis
Keyword(s):  
Job Satisfaction ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Work Environment ◽  
Critical Care Nurses ◽  
Work Environments ◽  
Care Nurse ◽  
Critical Care Nurse ◽  
Healthy Work Environment ◽  
Healthy Work ◽  
Nurse Outcomes

BACKGROUNDThe health of critical care nurse work environments affects patient and nurse outcomes. The results of the 2018 Critical Care Nurse Work Environment Study are reported here with comparisons to previous studies and recommendations for continued improvement.OBJECTIVETo evaluate the current state of critical care nurse work environments.METHODSAn online survey was used to collect quantitative and qualitative data for this mixed-methods study. A total of 8080 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN) members and constituents responded to the survey.RESULTSThe health of critical care nurse work environments has improved since the previous study in 2013; however, there are still areas of concern and opportunities for improvement. Key findings include documented absence of appropriate staffing by more than 60% of participants; an alarming number of physical and mental well-being issues (198 340 incidents reported by 6017 participants); one-third of the participants expressed intent to leave their current positions in the next 12 months; and evidence of the positive outcomes of implementing the AACN Healthy Work Environment standards.CONCLUSIONEvidence of the relationship between healthy nurse work environments and patient and nurse outcomes continues to increase. The results of this study provide evidence of the positive relationship between implementation of the AACN Healthy Work Environment standards and the health of critical care nurse work environments, between the health of critical care nurse work environments and job satisfaction, and between job satisfaction and the intent of critical care nurses to leave their current positions or stay.

Changing the Work Environment in Intensive Care Units to Achieve Patient-Focused Care: The Time Has Come

2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 541-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen McCauley ◽  
Richard S. Irwin
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Work Environment ◽  
American Association ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Professional Community ◽  
Critical Care Nurses ◽  
Work Environments ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Healthy Work ◽  
Healthy Work Environments

The American Association of Critical-Care Nurses Standards for Establishing and Sustaining Healthy Work Environments and the American College of Chest Physicians Patient-Focused Care project are complementary initiatives that provide a road map for creating practice environments where interdisciplinary, patient-focused care can thrive. Healthy work environments are so influential that failure to address the issue would result in deleterious effects for every aspect of acute and critical care practice. Skilled communication and true collaboration are crucial for transforming work environments. The American College of Chest Physicians project on patient-focused care was born out of a realization that medicine as currently practiced is too fragmented, too focused on turf battles that hinder communication, and too divorced from a real understanding of what patients expect and need from their healthcare providers. Communication as well as continuity and concordance with the patients’ wishes are foundational premises of care that is patient-focused and safe. Some individuals may achieve some level of genuine patient-focused care even when they practice in a toxic work environment because they are gifted communicators who embrace true collaboration. At best, most likely those efforts will be hit-or-miss and such heroism will be impossible to sustain if the environment is not transformed into a model that reflects standards and initiatives set out by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses and the American College of Chest Physicians. Other innovative models of care delivery remain unreported. The successes and failures of these models should be shared with the professional community.

Nurse Managers Leading the Way: Reenvisioning Stress to Maintain Healthy Work Environments

2021 ◽  
pp. e1-e7
Author(s):  
Kimberly Dimino ◽  
Amy E. Learmonth ◽  
Christiam C. Fajardo
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Work Environment ◽  
Nurse Managers ◽  
American Association ◽  
Critical Care Nurses ◽  
Work Environments ◽  
The Real ◽  
Experience Of Stress ◽  
Healthy Work ◽  
Healthy Work Environments

Background Stress among nurses is well documented, and in the midst of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, it has reached record highs. Problem Under normal conditions, nurse managers and frontline nurses face stressors that come with the territory of their profession, but the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has greatly added to their burden. Nurse managers are being called not only to help their organizations manage the crisis operationally, but also to help the nurses they supervise mentally, emotionally, and even ethically. Discussion This article provides recommendations for how nurse managers can use the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses Healthy Work Environment standards and make the experience of stress more productive. Conclusion Stress comes with the territory in nursing, but nurses can work together to make stress their ally and not their enemy. The real enemies are coronavirus disease 2019, burnout, and the aftermath of uncontrolled stress. When nurses keep stress in perspective and focus on what they can control, they contribute to developing healthier work environments.

Critical Care Nurse Burnout in Veterans Health Administration: Relation to Clinician and Patient Outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 435-442
Author(s):  
David C. Mohr ◽  
Lakshmana Swamy ◽  
Edwin S. Wong ◽  
Meredith Mealer ◽  
Marc Moss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Employee Satisfaction ◽  
Veterans Health Administration ◽  
Critical Care Nurses ◽  
Veterans Health ◽  
Health Administration ◽  
Care Nurse ◽  
Critical Care Nurse ◽  
Nurse Burnout

Background Critical care nurses have a burnout rate among the highest of any nursing field. Nurse burnout may impact care quality. Few studies have considered how temporal patterns may influence outcomes. Objective To test a longitudinal model of burnout clusters and associations with patient and clinician outcomes. Methods An observational study analyzed data from annual employee surveys and administrative data on patient outcomes at 111 Veterans Health Administration intensive care units from 2013 through 2017. Site-level burnout rates among critical care nurses were calculated from survey responses about emotional exhaustion and depersonalization. Latent trajectory analysis was applied to identify clusters of facilities with similar burnout patterns over 5 years. Regression analysis was used to analyze patient and employee outcomes by burnout cluster and organizational context measures. Outcomes of interest included patient outcomes (30-day standardized mortality rate and observed minus expected length of stay) for 2016 and 2017 and clinician outcomes (intention to leave and employee satisfaction) from 2013 through 2017. Results Longitudinal analysis revealed 3 burnout clusters among the 111 sites: low (n = 37), medium (n = 68), and high (n = 6) burnout. Compared with sites in the low-burnout cluster, those in the high-burnout cluster had longer patient stays, higher employee turnover intention, and lower employee satisfaction in bivariate models but not in multivariate models. Conclusions In this multiyear, multisite study, critical care nurse burnout was associated with key clinician and patient outcomes. Efforts to address burnout among nurses may improve patient and employee outcomes.

Compassion Fatigue and the Healthy Work Environment

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesly Kelly ◽  
Michael Todd
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Work Environment ◽  
Compassion Fatigue ◽  
American Association ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Compassion Satisfaction ◽  
Critical Care Nurses ◽  
Healthy Work Environment ◽  
Healthy Work

Background:Burnout is a concern for critical care nurses in high-intensity environments. Studies have highlighted the importance of a healthy work environment in promoting optimal nurse and patient outcomes, but research examining the relationship between a healthy work environment and burnout is limited.Objective:To examine how healthy work environment components relate to compassion fatigue (eg, burnout, secondary trauma) and compassion satisfaction.Methods:Nurses (n = 105) in 3 intensive care units at an academic medical center completed a survey including the Professional Quality of Life and the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses’ Healthy Work Environment standards.Results:Regression models using each Healthy Work Environment component to predict each outcome, adjusting for background variables, showed that the 5 Healthy Work Environment components predicted burnout and that meaningful recognition and authentic leadership predicted compassion satisfaction.Conclusions:Findings on associations between healthy work environment standards and burnout suggest the potential importance of implementing the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses’ Healthy Work Environment standards as a mechanism for decreasing burnout.

Quality assurance and the critical care nurse

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 34-40
Author(s):  
P Brown-Stewart
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assurance ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Monitoring And Evaluation ◽  
Critical Care Nurses ◽  
Care Nurse ◽  
Critical Care Nurse ◽  
Appropriateness Of Care ◽  
External Sources ◽  
The Way

Care of the critically ill has become increasingly challenging due to demands from external sources to measure the quality and appropriateness of care provided. Quality assurance is the responsibility of every critical care nurse and requires vigilance as well as a knowledge of the principles of standards, monitoring and evaluation. Through quality assurance activities, the contribution of critical care nurses in the achievement of patient outcomes can be measured. Quality assurance challenges us to evaluate the way we practice, and assists us to continuously improve the way we provide care to critically ill patients.

Perceptions and significance of patient deaths for pediatric critical care nurses

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 72-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
SW Benica ◽  
CB Longo ◽  
JH Barnsteiner
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Stress Management ◽  
Critical Care Nurses ◽  
The Other ◽  
Recruitment Strategies ◽  
Pediatric Critical Care ◽  
Care Nurse ◽  
Critical Care Nurse ◽  
Hospital Administrator ◽  
Dying Patients

This study provides nursing administrators with data regarding stressors of the pediatric critical care nurse in order of priority. Death of patients was the only item isolated and compared to the other stress categories. It is suggested that death of patients be compared to all other items on the audit. The authors recommend expanding this study by asking two additional questions: Does the amount of time spent caring for dying patients correlate with the nurses' estimate of patient deaths and is there a relationship between the time spent caring for patients who die and perception of death as a stressor? This information can be utilized at the unit level in the development of stress management activities. At the hospital administrator level, this information can assist in the expansion of retention and recruitment strategies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document