Malampaya Deep Water Gas Pipeline and Flowlines: Technical and Engineering Challenges faced in the Execution of the Malampaya Pipeline Scope

Author(s):  
J.C. Macara
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Yu ◽  
Cheng Hui ◽  
Chao Wen Sun ◽  
Zhan Ling Zou ◽  
Bin Lu Zhuo ◽  
...  

Abstract Hydrate-associated issues are of great significance to the oil and gas sector when advancing the development of offshore reservoir. Gas hydrate is easy to form under the condition featuring depressed temperature and elevated pressure within deep-water gas pipeline. Once hydrate deposition is formed within the pipelines, the energy transmission efficiency will be greatly reduced. An accurate prediction of hydrate-obstruction-development behavior will assist flow-assurance engineers to cultivate resource-conserving and environment-friendly strategies for managing hydrate. Based on the long-distance transportation characteristics of deep-water gas pipeline, a quantitative prediction method is expected to explain the hydrate-obstruction-formation behavior in deep-water gas pipeline throughout the production of deep-water gas well. Through a deep analysis of the features of hydrate shaping and precipitation at various locations inside the system, the advised method can quantitatively foresee the dangerous position and intensity of hydrate obstruction. The time from the start of production to the dramatic change of pressure drop brought about by the deposition of hydrate attached to the pipe wall is defined as the Hydrate Plugging Alarm Window (HPAW), which provides guidance for the subsequent hydrate treatment. Case study of deep-water gas pipeline constructed in the South China Sea is performed with the advised method. The simulation outcomes show that hydrates shape and deposit along pipe wall, constructing an endlessly and inconsistently developing hydrate layer, which restricts the pipe, raises the pressure drop, and ultimately leads to obstruction. At the area of 700m-3200m away from the pipeline inlet, the hydrate layer develops all the more swiftly, which points to the region of high risk of obstruction. As the gas-flow rate increases, the period needed for the system to shape hydrate obstruction becomes less. The narrower the internal diameter of the pipeline is, the more severe risk of hydrate obstruction will occur. The HPAW is 100 days under the case conditions. As the concentration of hydrate inhibitor rises, the region inside the system that tallies with the hydrate phase equilibrium conditions progressively reduces and the hydrate deposition rate slows down. The advised method will support operators to define the location of hydrate inhibitor injection within a shorter period in comparison to the conventional method. This work will deliver key instructions for locating the hydrate plugging position in a fast way in addition to solving the problem of hydrate flow assurance in deep-water gas pipelines at a reduced cost.


2015 ◽  
Vol 772 ◽  
pp. 154-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aijaz Abbasi ◽  
Fakhruldin M. Hashim

Since formation of hydrate in deep water pipeline could cause problems such as decreasing hydrocarbon production and increasing operational cost and time, this work offers to ascertain when and where hydrate will form with respect to change in pressure and temperature in deep water gas pipeline. The pressure is relatively high in deep water pipeline, and it is entirely possible to meet the hydrate formation conditions and pose a significant operational and security challenge. The study aims to develop a correlation that will help in finding hydrate formation pressure and temperature conditions of gas mixture flowing in deep water pipeline. The correlation is based on gas hydrates formation temperature with and without concentration of inhibitors. On the basis of existing published experimental data from the work by ‘E. Dendy Sloan’ and ‘Riki Kabayashi’, a new correlation will be developed using Particle Swarm Optimization. This research provides an effective coefficients for predicting hydrate formation Pressure / Temperature conditions for deep water gas pipeline.


Author(s):  
Weiguo Zhang ◽  
Hao Jin ◽  
Qingjie Du ◽  
Kai Xie ◽  
Binbin Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Gerardo Vallejo ◽  
Aciel Olivares ◽  
Pablo Crespo Hdez ◽  
Eduardo R. Roman ◽  
Claudio Rogerio Tigre Maia ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (45) ◽  
pp. 27869-27876
Author(s):  
Martino Foschi ◽  
Joseph A. Cartwright ◽  
Christopher W. MacMinn ◽  
Giuseppe Etiope

Geologic hydrocarbon seepage is considered to be the dominant natural source of atmospheric methane in terrestrial and shallow‐water areas; in deep‐water areas, in contrast, hydrocarbon seepage is expected to have no atmospheric impact because the gas is typically consumed throughout the water column. Here, we present evidence for a sudden expulsion of a reservoir‐size quantity of methane from a deep‐water seep during the Pliocene, resulting from natural reservoir overpressure. Combining three-dimensional seismic data, borehole data and fluid‐flow modeling, we estimate that 18–27 of the 23–31 Tg of methane released at the seafloor could have reached the atmosphere over 39–241 days. This emission is ∼10% and ∼28% of present‐day, annual natural and petroleum‐industry methane emissions, respectively. While no such ultraseepage events have been documented in modern times and their frequency is unknown, seismic data suggest they were not rare in the past and may potentially occur at present in critically pressurized reservoirs. This neglected phenomenon can influence decadal changes in atmospheric methane.


Author(s):  
Jianbo Zhang ◽  
Zhiyuan Wang ◽  
Baojiang Sun ◽  
Xiaohui Sun ◽  
Youqiang Liao

Fuel ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 275 ◽  
pp. 117944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyuan Wang ◽  
Shikun Tong ◽  
Chao Wang ◽  
Jianbo Zhang ◽  
Weiqi Fu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document