scholarly journals Prosthetic treatment for patient with upper lip cancer and severe periodontitis: Maxillary complete denture with denture adhesive and mandibular double crown-retained removable partial denture

2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Hyun-Suk Choi ◽  
Cheong-Hee Lee ◽  
Jin-Hyun Cho
2006 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 291-296
Author(s):  
N. Dulčić ◽  
V. Jerolimov ◽  
J. Pandurić

A dogmatic view on occlusion as the main aetiological factor for temporomandibular disorder (TMD) has been present in the literature for a long time, but a direct scientific correlation between occlusal disorders and TMD has never been proven. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of TMD signs and tissue-specific diagnoses in a population of 164 asymptomatic participants, 70 removable partial denture wearers and 94 complete denture wearers of an average age of 61.3 years, by means of clinical manual functional analysis. TMD was found in 42.1% of the participants. No statistically significant difference in the occurrence of TMD was found between removable partial and complete denture wearers and between genders (P > 0.05). The most frequent tissue-specific diagnoses were osteoarthrosis (11%), total anterior disc displacement (9.1%) and partial anterolateral disc displacement (8.5%). The frequency of tissue-specific diagnoses was also not influenced by the type of prosthetic replacements.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
TUN MIN BO ◽  
Yohei Hama ◽  
NORIHISA AKIBA ◽  
SHUNSUKE MINAKUCHI

Abstract Background: An increase in the number of elderly edentulous patients likely leads to a greater demand for dentures and denture adhesives. As denture adhesives have both positive and negative features, dentists need to know the types of denture adhesive users to be able to provide instruction to denture wearers on how to use denture adhesives effectively. This study aims to examine the utilization of denture adhesives and associated factors.Methods: Seven closed-ended questionnaires were developed for a web-based survey. After that, Fisher’s exact tests were performed to determine the difference in the denture adhesive usage rate by gender, type of denture, last dental visit, and smoking status. A multivariate-adjusted logistic regression analysis was performed with denture adhesive use or non-use as the dependent variable and the other items as independent variables. Next, Fisher’s exact tests and a multivariate-adjusted logistic regression analysis were performed with the type of denture adhesives as the dependent variable in the same way. Statistical analyses were performed for all denture wearers, complete denture wearers, and partial denture wearers. The level of statistical significance was set at p=0.05. Results: A total of 1470 denture wearers in Japan participated in this study. Of these, 318 used denture adhesives, while 212 (66.7%) used cream; 74 (23.3%) used home liner; 25 (7.9%) used powder; four (1.3%) used sheets; and three (0.9%) used several types. The Fisher’s exact tests revealed that the ratios of using denture adhesives were significantly higher for complete denture wearers (p<0.001), last dental visit over one year (p=0.005), and smokers (p=0.005). For partial denture wearers, the ratio was significantly higher in smokers (p=0.262). The multivariate adjusted logistic regression revealed that denture adhesive use or non-use were significantly associated with the type of denture and smoking status in all denture wearers, and just smoking status in partial denture wearers. There were no significant results about the type of denture adhesive selection.Conclusions: From all denture wearers, complete denture wearers and smokers are more likely to use denture adhesives. In addition, smokers significantly use denture adhesives if they are partial denture wearers.


Author(s):  
Raphael Freitas de Souza ◽  
Juliê Marra ◽  
Ana Carolina Pero ◽  
Rômulo Rocha Regis ◽  
Marco Antonio Compagnoni ◽  
...  

Gerodontology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raphael Freitas de Souza ◽  
Juliê Marra ◽  
Ana Carolina Pero ◽  
Rômulo Rocha Regis ◽  
Marco Antonio Compagnoni ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriane Morás ◽  
César Spielmann ◽  
Alexandre Conde ◽  
Juliane Pereira Butze

Objetivos: O presente estudo teve como objetivo relatar a análise de um prontuário de paciente portador da Síndrome da Combinação, cuja reabilitação bucal foi realizada através da associação de diferentes tipos de próteses. Materiais e Métodos: Um prontuário de uma paciente que procurou tratamento reabilitador no complexo odontológico da FSG Centro Universitário dentro das disciplinas de Prótese Dentária do curso de Odontologia da FSG Centro Universitário entre os anos de 2017 e 2018 foi escolhido contemplando a condição clínica de necessidade de três modalidades de prótese (prótese total, prótese fixa e prótese parcial removível) ao mesmo tempo para reabilitação, configurando um paciente com Síndrome da Combinação Protética. Resultados: Foi encontrada as seguintes condições 1) Reabsorção óssea na região anterior da maxila; 2) Aumento das tuberosidades; 3) Extrusão dos dentes naturais anteriores mandibulares; 4) Perda óssea abaixo da base de resina acrílica da PPR inferior. Conclusão: Foi possível relatar que, provavelmente, o motivo da instalação da Síndrome da Combinação para o prontuário analisado foi: 1) Ausência de saúde periodontal; 2) Tempo prolongado de uso das próteses antigas; 3) Desarmonia oclusal; e 4) Condição financeira como motivo de retardo na procura do cirurgião-dentista. Descritores: Síndrome; Prótese Total; Reabilitação Bucal.ReferênciasMezzomo E, Suzuki RM. Reabilitação oral contemporânea. São Paulo: Santos; 2012.Goyatá FR, Tostes Vl, Rodrigues CRT, Corga RB, Cunha LG. Síndrome da combinação- Relato de Caso Clínico. IJD. Recife. 2010;9(3):160-64.Kelly E. Changes caused by a mandibular removable partial denture opposing a maxillary complete denture. J Prosthet Dent. 1972;27(2):140-50. Nogueira RP, Miraglia SS, Soares FAV. Considerações sobre síndrome da combinação (Kelly) na clínica odontológica reabilitadora. PCL-Rev bras prótese clín lab. 2002;4(19):218-22.Campos MTFS, Monteiro JBR, Ornelas APRC. Fatores que afetam o consumo alimentar e a nutrição do idoso. Rev Nutr. 2000;13(3):157-65.Silva MES, Magalhães CS, Ferreira EF. Perda dentária e expectativa da reposição protética: estudo qualitativo. Ciênc saúde coletiva. 2010;15(3):813-20Carvalho LF, Melo JRO, Carvalho FAA, Ramos JG, Lima RA. O impacto do edentulismo na qualidade de vida de pacientes edêntulos. Rev ACBO. 2019;8(1):40-8.Cunha LDAP, Rocha EP, Pellizzer EP. Prevalência da Síndrome de Kelly em usuários de prótese parcial removível. RGO. 2007;55(4):325-28.Palmqvist S, Carlsson GE, Owall B. The combination syndrome: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 90(3):270-75.Crawford RWI, Walmsley AD. A review of prosthodontic management of fibrous ridges. Br Dent J. 2005;199(11):715-19.Costa MM, Cardoso GM, Ferreira Júnior LH,  Resende CD, Tavares LN, Rocha FS et al. Síndrome da Combinação: diagnóstico, prevenção e considerações sobre o tratamento Rev Odontol Bras Central 2016;25(72):59-64.Giampaolo ET. Síndrome da combinação em próteses parciais removíveis: sinais, sintomas e plano de tratamento. In: Vanzillotta PS, Salgado LPS. Odontologia integrada: atualizaçäo multidisciplinar para o clínico e o especialista. Rio de Janeiro, Pedro Primeiro, 2001: Pedro Primeiro; 2001.Saunders TR, Gillis RE Jr, Desjardins RP. The maxillary complete denture opposing the mandibular bilateral distalextension partial denture: treatment considerations. J Prosthet Dent. 1949;41(2):124-28.Hansen CA, Jaarda MJ. Treatment alternatives for modified combination syndrome. Gen Dent. 1990;38(2):132-37Salvador MCG, Valle AL, Ribeiro MCM, Pereira JR. Assessment of the prevalence index on signs of combination syndrome patients treated at Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo. J Appl Oral Sci. 2007;15(1):9-13.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
TUN MIN BO ◽  
Yohei Hama ◽  
NORIHISA AKIBA ◽  
SHUNSUKE MINAKUCHI

Abstract Background: An increase in the number of elderly edentulous patients likely leads to a greater demand for dentures and denture adhesives. As denture adhesives have positive and negative features, dentists need to know the types of denture adhesive users to be able to provide instruction to denture wearers on how to use denture adhesives effectively. This study aims to examine the utilization of denture adhesives and associated factors.Methods: Seven closed-ended questionnaires were developed for a web-based survey. After that, Fisher’s exact tests were performed to determine the difference in the denture adhesive usage rate by gender, type of denture, last dental visit, and smoking status. A multivariate-adjusted logistic regression analysis was performed with denture adhesive use or non-use as the dependent variable and the other items as independent variables. Next, Fisher’s exact tests and a multivariate-adjusted logistic regression analysis were performed with the type of denture adhesives as the dependent variable in the same way. Statistical analyses were performed for all denture wearers, complete denture wearers, and partial denture wearers. The level of statistical significance was set at p=0.05. Results: A total of 1470 denture wearers in Japan participated in this study. Of these, 318 used denture adhesives, while 212 (66.7%) used cream; 74 (23.3%) used home liner; 25 (7.9%) used powder; four (1.3%) used sheets; and three (0.9%) used several types. The Fisher’s exact tests revealed that the ratios of using denture adhesives were significantly higher for complete denture wearers (p<0.001), last dental visit over one year (p=0.005), and smokers (p=0.005). For partial denture wearers, the ratio was significantly higher in smokers (p=0.262). The multivariate adjusted logistic regression revealed that denture adhesive use or non-use were significantly associated with the type of denture and smoking status in all denture wearers, and just smoking status in partial denture wearers. There were no significant results about the type of denture adhesive selection.Conclusions: From all denture wearers, complete denture wearers and smokers are more likely to use denture adhesives. In addition, smokers significantly use denture adhesives if they are partial denture wearers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document