scholarly journals Cutting Edge: Hierarchy of Chemokine Receptor and TCR Signals Regulating T Cell Migration and Proliferation

2000 ◽  
Vol 165 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon K. Bromley ◽  
Daniel A. Peterson ◽  
Michael D. Gunn ◽  
Michael L. Dustin
2001 ◽  
Vol 167 (4) ◽  
pp. 1857-1861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine C. Ottoson ◽  
Jonathan T. Pribila ◽  
Anissa S. H. Chan ◽  
Yoji Shimizu

2016 ◽  
Vol 76 (17) ◽  
pp. 5068-5079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Sugata ◽  
Jun-ichirou Yasunaga ◽  
Haruka Kinosada ◽  
Yuichi Mitobe ◽  
Rie Furuta ◽  
...  

Immunity ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 524-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather D. Hickman ◽  
Glennys V. Reynoso ◽  
Barbara F. Ngudiankama ◽  
Stephanie S. Cush ◽  
James Gibbs ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 109 (12) ◽  
pp. 4598-4603 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. O'Boyle ◽  
C. R. J. Fox ◽  
H. R. Walden ◽  
J. D. P. Willet ◽  
E. R. Mavin ◽  
...  

F1000Research ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 922
Author(s):  
Johannes M. Dijkstra

This correspondence concerns a recent publication in Immunity by Hickman et al.1 who analyzed the effect of Cxcr3 knockout on migration of CD8+ T cells towards and within vaccinia virus-infected mouse ears.  They found that Cxcr3 knockout had no effect on CD8+ T cell migration into the infected ears, a relatively mild effect on virus clearance, and an effect on the contact of CD8+ T cells with virus-infected cells.  Curiously, despite having these basically sound and interesting data, Hickman et al. exaggerated the effect on virus clearance (“dramatically impaired virus clearance”) and focused their conclusions on assumed differences in migration towards infected cells (“CXCR3 chemokine receptor enables local CD8+ T cell migration”) rather than on better proven differences in binding to infected cells.  I believe that from the data presented by Hickman et al. on the effect of Cxcr3 knockout a migration effect independent from the binding effect cannot be concluded beyond discussion.  The fact that CXCR3 is a chemokine receptor, and that most researchers consequently expect a chemokine-gradient-dependent migration effect of the Cxcr3 knockout mutation, increases the risk of misleading readers when approached through the Hickman et al. narrative.  The here-initiated discussion of their article may help to avoid such a misleading.


2006 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 1304-1312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianqian Zhang ◽  
Rajasekharan Somasundaram ◽  
Carol Berking ◽  
Laura Caputo ◽  
Patricia Van Belle ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (555) ◽  
pp. eaaq1075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey S. Smith ◽  
Lowell T. Nicholson ◽  
Jutamas Suwanpradid ◽  
Rachel A. Glenn ◽  
Nicole M. Knape ◽  
...  

The chemokine receptor CXCR3 plays a central role in inflammation by mediating effector/memory T cell migration in various diseases; however, drugs targeting CXCR3 and other chemokine receptors are largely ineffective in treating inflammation. Chemokines, the endogenous peptide ligands of chemokine receptors, can exhibit so-called biased agonism by selectively activating either G protein– or β-arrestin–mediated signaling after receptor binding. Biased agonists might be used as more targeted therapeutics to differentially regulate physiological responses, such as immune cell migration. To test whether CXCR3-mediated physiological responses could be segregated by G protein– and β-arrestin–mediated signaling, we identified and characterized small-molecule biased agonists of the receptor. In a mouse model of T cell–mediated allergic contact hypersensitivity (CHS), topical application of a β-arrestin–biased, but not a G protein–biased, agonist potentiated inflammation. T cell recruitment was increased by the β-arrestin–biased agonist, and biopsies of patients with allergic CHS demonstrated coexpression of CXCR3 and β-arrestin in T cells. In mouse and human T cells, the β-arrestin–biased agonist was the most efficient at stimulating chemotaxis. Analysis of phosphorylated proteins in human lymphocytes showed that β-arrestin–biased signaling activated the kinase Akt, which promoted T cell migration. This study demonstrates that biased agonists of CXCR3 produce distinct physiological effects, suggesting discrete roles for different endogenous CXCR3 ligands and providing evidence that biased signaling can affect the clinical utility of drugs targeting CXCR3 and other chemokine receptors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document