scholarly journals Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Review of 97 Patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. 038-043 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anish Mehta ◽  
Rohan Mahale ◽  
Kiran Buddaraju ◽  
Anas Majeed ◽  
Suryanarayana Sharma ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) has now become a standard treatment in eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who present within 4.5 h of symptom onset. Objective: To determine the usefulness of IVT and the subset of patients who will benefit from IVT in AIS within 4.5 h. Materials and Methods: Patients with AIS within 4.5 h of symptom onset who underwent IVT were studied prospectively. The study period was from October 2011 to October 2015. Results: A total of 97 patients were thrombolysed intravenously. The mean onset to needle time in all patients was 177.2 ± 62 min (range: 60–360). At 3 months follow-up, favorable outcome was seen in 65 patients (67.1%) and poor outcome including death in the remaining 32 patients (32.9%). Factors predicting favorable outcome was age <65 years (P = 0.02), the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) <15 (P < 0.001), small vessel occlusion (P = 0.006), cardioembolism (P = 0.006), and random blood sugar (RBS) <250 mg/dl (P < 0.001). Factors predicting poor outcome was diabetes mellitus (P = 0.01), dyslipidemia (P = 0.01), NIHSS at admission >15 (P = 0.03), RBS >250 mg/dl (P = 0.01), Dense cerebral artery sign, age, glucose level on admission, onset-to-treatment time, NIHSS on admission score >5 (P = 0.03), and occlusion of large artery (P = 0.02). Conclusion: Milder baseline stroke severity, blood glucose <250 mg/dL, younger patients (<65 years), cardioembolic stroke, and small vessel occlusion benefit from recombinant tissue plasminogen activator.

Stroke ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 1805-1811 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susumu Kobayashi ◽  
Shingo Fukuma ◽  
Tatsuyoshi Ikenoue ◽  
Shunichi Fukuhara ◽  
Shotai Kobayashi ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose— In Japan, nearly half of ischemic stroke patients receive edaravone for acute treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of edaravone on neurological symptoms in patients with ischemic stroke stratified by stroke subtype. Methods— Study subjects were 61 048 patients aged 18 years or older who were hospitalized ≤14 days after onset of an acute ischemic stroke and were registered in the Japan Stroke Data Bank, a hospital-based multicenter stroke registration database, between June 2001 and July 2013. Patients were stratified according to ischemic stroke subtype (large-artery atherosclerosis, cardioembolism, small-vessel occlusion, and cryptogenic/undetermined) and then divided into 2 groups (edaravone-treated and no edaravone). Neurological symptoms were evaluated using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The primary outcome was changed in neurological symptoms during the hospital stay (ΔNIHSS=NIHSS score at discharge−NIHSS score at admission). Data were analyzed using multivariate linear regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting after adjusting for the following confounding factors: age, gender, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure at the start of treatment, NIHSS score at admission, time from stroke onset to hospital admission, infarct size, comorbidities, concomitant medication, clinical department, history of smoking, alcohol consumption, and history of stroke. Results— After adjusting for potential confounders, the improvement in NIHSS score from admission to discharge was greater in the edaravone-treated group than in the no edaravone group for all ischemic stroke subtypes (mean [95% CI] difference in ΔNIHSS: −0.46 [−0.75 to −0.16] for large-artery atherosclerosis, −0.64 [−1.09 to −0.2] for cardioembolism, and −0.25 [−0.4 to −0.09] for small-vessel occlusion). Conclusions— For any ischemic stroke subtype, edaravone use (compared with no use) was associated with a greater improvement in neurological symptoms, although the difference was small (<1 point NIHSS) and of limited clinical significance.


Stroke ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Esteban Cheng-Ching ◽  
Dolora Wisco ◽  
Shumei Man ◽  
Ferdinand Hui ◽  
Gabor Toth ◽  
...  

Background and purpose Large artery occlusion leads to ischemic stroke which volume is influenced by time from symptom onset. This effect is modulated by several factors, including the presence and degree of collateral circulation. We analyze the correlation between a standard angiographic collateral grading system and DWI infarct volumes. Methods We reviewed a prospectively collected retrospective database of ischemic stroke patients admitted between august of 2006 and december of 2011. We included patients with anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke presenting within 8 hours from symptom onset with large vessel occlusion, who underwent pre-treatment MRI and endovascular therapy. DWI infarct volumes were measured by region of interest. ASITN collateral grading system was used and grouped into “good collaterals” for grades 3 and 4, and “poor collaterals” for grades 0, 1 and 2. JMP statistical software was utilized. Results 152 patients (71 (46.7%) male, mean age: 68±15 years;) were included in the initial analysis. We identified 49 patients who had angiographic collateral circulation grading. Seven patients had ASITN collateral grade 0 with mean infarct volume of 27.6 cc, 25 had collateral grade of 1 with mean infarct volume of 27.9 cc, 10 had collateral grade of 2 with mean infarct volume of 23.4 cc, 5 had collateral grade of 3 with mean infarct volume of 6.3 cc, and 2 had collateral grade of 4 with mean infarct volume of 14.6 cc. Forty two patients had “poor collaterals” with a mean infarct volume of 26.8 cc. Seven patients had “good collaterals” with mean infarct volume of 8.7 cc. When comparing the infarct volumes between these two groups, the difference was statistically significant (p=0.017). Conclusions In anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke, “good” angiographic collateral circulation defined as ASITN grading system of 3 or 4, correlates with lower infarct volumes on presentation.


Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo Saposnik ◽  
Jiming Fang ◽  
Moira Kapral ◽  
Jack Tu ◽  
Muhammad Mamdani ◽  
...  

Background: The iScore is a validated tool developed to estimate the risk of death and functional outcomes early after an acute ischemic stroke. It includes demographics, stroke severity and subtype, vascular risk factors, cancer, renal failure, and pre-admission functional status. Limited information is available to predict the clinical response after intravenous thrombolytic therapy (tPA). Objective: To determine the ability of the iScore to predict the clinical response and risk of hemorrhagic transformation after tPA. Methods: We applied the iScore ( www.sorcan.ca/iscore ) to patients presenting with an acute ischemic stroke at 11 stroke centres in Ontario, Canada, between 2003 and 2008, identified from the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network (RCSN). We compared outcomes between patients receiving and not receiving tPA adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics through matching by propensity scores. Three groups were defined a priori as per the iScore (low risk 180). Outcome Measures: Poor outcome, the primary outcome measure, was defined as disability at discharge or death at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included disability at discharge, neurological deterioration and intracranial hemorrhage (any type and symptomatic). Results: Among 12,686 patients with an acute ischemic stroke, 1696 (13.4%) received intravenous thrombolysis. Overall, 589 tPA patients were matched with 589 non-tPA patients (low iScore risk), 682 tPA were matched with 682 non-tPA patients (medium iScore risk) and 419 tPA patients were matched with 419 non-tPA patients (high iScore risk). There was good matching in all three groups. Higher iScore was associated with poor functional outcome in both the tPA and non-tPA groups (p<0.001). Among those with low and medium iScore risk, tPA use was associated with lower risk of poor outcome (Low iScore RR 0.74; 95%CI 0.67-0.84; medium iScore RR 0.88; 95%CI 0.84-0.93). There was no difference in clinical outcomes between matched patients receiving and not receiving tPA in the highest iScore group (RR 0.97; 95%CI 0.94-1.01). Similar results were observed for disability at discharge and length of stay. The incident risk of neurological deterioration and hemorrhagic transformation (any or symptomatic) increased with the iScore risk ( Figure ). Conclusion: The iScore appears to predict clinical response and risk of hemorrhagic complications after tPA for an acute ischemic stroke. Patients with high iScores may not benefit from tPA and have higher risk of hemorrhagic transformation, though this finding should be validated independently (underway) before clinical use.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgios Tsivgoulis ◽  
Nitin Goyal ◽  
Aristeidis H Katsanos ◽  
Konark Malhotra ◽  
Michael T Frohler ◽  
...  

Introduction: We investigated the effectiveness of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) and mild neurological deficits defined as National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores <6 points (mELVO). Methods: The primary efficacy outcome was three-month functional independence (FI; mRS-scores of 0-2) that was compared between patients with and without IVT treatment. Other efficacy outcomes of interest included three-month favorable functional outcome (FFO; mRS-scores of 0-1) and mRS-scores distribution at discharge and at 3 months. The safety outcomes comprised all-cause 3-month mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), asymptomatic ICH and severe systemic bleeding. Results: We evaluated 336 AIS patients with mELVO (mean age: 63±15 years, 45% women). Patients treated with IVT (n=162) had higher FI (85.6% vs. 74.8%, p=0.027) with lower mRS scores at hospital discharge (p=0.034) compared to the rest. Three-month mRS-scores tended to be lower in the IVT group (p=0.069). No differences were detected in any of the safety outcomes including symptomatic ICH, asymptomatic ICH, severe systemic bleeding and 3-month mortality (p>0.1). IVT was associated with higher likelihood of 3-month FI (OR=2.19, 95%CI: 1.09-4.42), 3-month FFO (OR=1.99, 95%CI: 1.10-3.57) and functional improvement at discharge [cOR (per 1-point decrease in mRS-score)=2.94, 95%CI: 1.67-5.26] and at 3 months (cOR=1.72, 95%CI: 1.06-2.86) on multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for potential confounders including mechanical thrombectomy. Conclusion: IVT is independently associated with higher odds of improved discharge and three-month functional outcomes in AIS patients with mELVO. IVT does not increase the risk of systemic or intracranial bleeding.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e31-e31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Gruber ◽  
Salome Zeller ◽  
Carlos Garcia-Esperon ◽  
Jatta Berberat ◽  
Javier Anon ◽  
...  

Background and purposeGiven the promising performance of the new Embolus Retriever with Interlinked Cages (ERIC) in smaller case series, we sought to assess the efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) with ERIC compared with other stent retrievers (SRs) in acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO).MethodsWe reviewed the databases of two comprehensive stroke centers in in Germany and Switzerland for MT due to LVO in the anterior circulation with either ERIC or another SR as a first device. Co-primary outcome was defined as successful recanalization (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b/3) after the first device and favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0–2) at 90 days' follow-up. Multiple logistic regression analysis was applied to adjust for potential confounders.Results183 consecutive patients with stroke were treated with either ERIC (49%) or a SR (51%) as the first device and successful recanalization was seen in 82% and 57%, respectively (P<0.001). Adding SR to futile ERIC recanalization or vice versa increased final recanalization rates (ERIC: 87%, SR: 79%). The use of ERIC as a first device resulted in favorable clinical outcome in 50% compared with 35% when a SR was used (P=0.038), an effect driven by age, stroke severity, presence of carotid-T-occlusion, and general anesthesia and not by the device deployed.ConclusionThe use of ERIC as a first device appeared to be associated with higher rates of successful recanalization and resulted in better functional outcome. However, favorable outcome was not attributable to ERIC. Most importantly, both device types complemented one another and improved final recanalization rates when used successively.


2018 ◽  
Vol 02 (03) ◽  
pp. 155-168
Author(s):  
Sharath Kumar G G ◽  
Chinmay Nagesh

AbstractTill recently, the mainstay of management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has been intravenous thrombolysis. However, response to treatment and outcomes in the presence of a large vessel occlusion (LVO) were largely suboptimal. Endovascular thrombectomy techniques with stentrievers and aspiration catheters have revolutionized stroke treatment significantly, improving outcomes in this once untreatable disease. The interventional radiologist must play an active role in the stroke team in streamlining imaging as well as endovascular management. The focus of this review article is on initial management and imaging. Initial measures consist of patient resuscitation, basic investigations and assessment of stroke severity using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), all of which have therapeutic and prognostic implications to be considered by the neurointerventionist. Imaging must aim to be swift and efficient. Choice of a modality must be based on available infrastructure as well as clinical-radiologic factors such as the time since ictus or posterior circulation involvement. Computed tomography (CT) is the preferred modality for its speed, whereas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the gold standard problem solving technique for detection of stroke. Exclusion of hemorrhagic stroke and other stroke mimics is the first objective. Thereafter, imaging is targeted toward assessing the parenchyma and vasculature. Defining the core and penumbra is the most important goal of parenchymal imaging. The core may be defined by the presence of early ischemic changes on CT, CT angiographic source images, or diffusion restriction on MRI. The penumbra is approximated by collateral status or perfusion methods. The prime directive of vascular imaging, either CT or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is to establish the presence of an LVO. Once confirmed, the decision for thrombolysis and/or thrombectomy is based on clinical and imaging criteria, the most ideal being that of a moderately severe stroke with a small core and LVO on imaging.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 7-14
Author(s):  
Pramod Dhonde ◽  
N. Kadam

Aim: To review literature about endovascular approaches to acute ischemic stroke and provide Indian perspective about managing these cases. Brief Summary: In acute ischemic stroke cases, intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with altepase within 4.5 hours has been the standard of care. Due to certain limitations of IVT, in pooled patientlevel data from 5 trials (HERMES [Highly Effective Reperfusion Evaluated in Multiple Endovascular Stroke Trials], which included the 5 trials MR CLEAN, ESCAPE, REVASCAT, SWIFT PRIME, and EXTEND-IA), mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is indicated for patients with acute ischemic stroke due to a large artery occlusion (LVO) in the anterior circulation who can be treated within 24 hours of the time last known to be well (ie, at neurologic baseline), regardless of whether they received intravenous alteplase for the same ischemic stroke event. The maximum benefit can be achieved within 6 hours of onset of symptoms. There are studies suggesting the benefit of MT in posterior circulation stroke as well as in distal arteries. We are going to review the methodology of endovascular techniques in brief alongwith Indian perspective on feasibility of this treatment approach in AIS. Conclusion: Mechnicalthrombectomy is certainly an effective modality of treatment in large vessel occlusion in anterior circulation within 24 hours. More awareness regarding the approach in India, can reduce the stroke morbidity and mortality in many of the cases in future


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
zhiqiang wang ◽  
Rongyu Wang ◽  
Yuxia Li ◽  
Mao Li ◽  
Yaodan Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundPlasma neurofilaments light chain (pNfL) is a marker of axonal injury. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of pNfL as a predictive biomarker for stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO).MethodsThis retrospective study was developed from a prospectively collected stroke database, which was conducted at a large academic comprehensive stroke center in western China. Consecutive patients ≥18 years with first-ever acute ischemic stroke (AIS) of anterior circulation within 24 hours of symptom onset were included. Stroke severity was analyzed at admission using the NIHSS score. The pNfL drawn within 24 h from symptom onset was analyzed with a novel ultrasensitive single molecule array. The diagnosis of LVO was based on vascular imaging.ResultsA total of 845 patients (male, 480 (56.80%); mean age, 62.67 (±11.84) years) were included analysis, and 144 (17.00%) were diagnosed with LVO. pNfL was markedly higher in patients with LVO (56.99(±14.67) versus 37.86(±13.82) pg/ml; P<0.001) than Non-LVO. pNfL was valuable for the prediction of LVO (OR, 1.099; 95% CI, 1.081-1.118; P<0.001), even adjusted for conventional risk factors (OR, 1.078; 95% CI, 1.058-1.098; P<0.001). The best cut-off value of pNfL to differentiate between patients with LVO and Non-LVO was 43.08 pg/mL, which yielded a sensitivity of 84.70% and specificity of 66.00%, with the area under the curve (AUC) at 0.826 (95% CI, 0.792-0.860; P<0.001). The highest AUC was reached by a combination of pNfL and NIHSS (AUC, 0.876; 95% CI, 0.849-0.902; P<0.001).ConclusionsStrokes with LVO were distinguishable from those without LVO following the determination of pNfL in the blood samples within 24 hours of onset. The pNfL is a promising biomarker of AIS with LVO.Clinical trial registration: ChiCTR1800020330.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-130
Author(s):  
Trung Quoc Nguyen ◽  
Anh Le Tuan Truong ◽  
Hoang Thi Kim Phan ◽  
Duan Duy Nguyen ◽  
Khang Vinh Nguyen ◽  
...  

Background: It remains controversial if intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) prior to mechanical thrombectomy (MTE) is superior to MTE alone in patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion. We aim to compare functional outcomes, mortality, reperfusion, and intracranial hemorrhage rates in bridging therapy (IVT prior thrombectomy) and MTE alone groups within 6 h from symptom onset. Materials and Methods: Consecutive hospitalized patients (September 2017 and July 2018) with acute large artery occlusion within the anterior cerebral circulation eligible for MTE with or without prior IVT were included. A modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 was considered as good functional outcome at 90 days. Successful reperfusion was defined as a Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale of 2b to 3. Results: Of the 124 patients included, 56 (45.2%) received bridging therapy and 68 (54.8%) received MTE alone. Patients receiving bridging therapy were younger (median, 56 vs 63, P = .045) and had shorter onset-to-groin time (median, 270 vs 370 min, P < .001) than those receiving MTE alone. Successful reperfusion rate was significantly greater in the bridging therapy group (87.5% vs 72.1%, P = 0.03). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in functional independence (bridging 58.9% vs 75.0%, P = 0.07), mortality at 90 days (bridging 14.3% vs 7.4%, P = 0.22), parenchymal hematoma type 2 (bridging 3.6% vs 2.9%, P > .99), and any hemorrhage (bridging 42.3% vs 26.5%, P = 0.07). Conclusion: Compared to MTE alone, bridging therapy with IVT improved the reperfusion rate but not other outcomes. Further clinical trials are needed to confirm our findings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document