scholarly journals Factors influencing endometrial thickness in postmenopausal women

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 608 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Hebbar ◽  
V Chaya ◽  
L Rai ◽  
A Ramachandran
2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Junko Nakamura ◽  
Takeharu Yoshikawa ◽  
Eriko Maeda ◽  
Hiroyuki Akai ◽  
Hiroshi Ohtsu ◽  
...  

Background: The accepted threshold for normal endometrial thickness is 5 mm; lesions with endometrial thickness < 5 mm are considered benign, whilst those > 5 mm areconsidered malignant. However, endometrium ≥ 5 mm on transvaginal ultrasonography inpostmenopausal woman is considered as asymptomatic endometrial thickening. However, recent studies suggest that asymptomatic endometrial thickness of even 8 mm – 11 mm in postmenopausal women may be normal.Objectives: The present study investigated the normal endometrial thickness range in 297 asymptomatic postmenopausal women using 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2-weighted sagittal images measured retrospectively by a single radiologist.Method: The data were classified according to patient age and postmenopausal duration, and the medical records and follow-up MR images were reviewed to assess the clinical outcome.Results: The mean endometrial thickness was 2.4 ± 0.1 mm (range: 0.1–11.6). The endometriumin 21 of 297 subjects was ≥ 5 mm thick. Follow-up MR images were obtained in 17 of these 21 women, and their endometrial thickness was found to have decreased in all of them. To date,none of the subjects has been diagnosed with endometrial cancer.Conclusion: Although 5 mm is considered the conservative threshold of normal endometrial thickness on MRI of postmenopausal women, this figure should not, to avoid excessive false-positive diagnoses, be assumed as an indication of malignancy.


2008 ◽  
Vol 93 (12) ◽  
pp. 4787-4796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herbert Marini ◽  
Alessandra Bitto ◽  
Domenica Altavilla ◽  
Bruce P. Burnett ◽  
Francesca Polito ◽  
...  

Context: Genistein aglycone improves bone metabolism in women. However, questions about the long-term safety of genistein on breast as well as its continued efficacy still remain. Objective: We assessed the continued safety profile of genistein aglycone on breast and endometrium and its effects on bone after 3 yr of therapy. Design: The parent study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 389 osteopenic, postmenopausal women for 24-months. Subsequently, a subcohort (138 patients) continued therapy for an additional year. Patients and Interventions: Participants received 54 mg of genistein aglycone daily (n = 71) or placebo (n = 67). Both treatment arms received calcium and vitamin D3 in therapeutic doses. Main Outcomes: Mammographic density was assessed at baseline, 24 and 36 months by visual classification scale and digitized quantification. BRCA1 and BRCA2, sister chromatid exchange, and endometrial thickness were also evaluated. Lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral density were also assessed. Secondary outcomes were biochemical levels of bone markers. Results: After 36 months, genistein did not significantly change mammographic breast density or endometrial thickness, BRCA1 and BRCA2 expression was preserved, whereas sister chromatid exchange was reduced compared with placebo. Bone mineral density increases were greater with genistein for both femoral neck and lumbar spine compared to placebo. Genistein also significantly reduced pyridinoline, as well as serum carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide and soluble receptor activator of NF-κB ligand while increasing bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, IGF-I, and osteoprotegerin levels. There were no differences in discomfort or adverse events between groups. Conclusions: After 3 yr of treatment, genistein exhibited a promising safety profile with positive effects on bone formation in a cohort of osteopenic, postmenopausal women.


2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Mohammadi ◽  
Jamileh Amirzadeh Iranagh ◽  
Seyedeh Ameneh Motalebi ◽  
Tengku Aizan Hamid

1984 ◽  
pp. 29-49
Author(s):  
V. H. T. James ◽  
E. J. Folkerd ◽  
R. C. Bonney ◽  
P. A. Beranek ◽  
M. J. Reed

2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sukhee Ahn ◽  
Huynli Kim ◽  
Heeyoung So ◽  
Rhayun Song

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document