scholarly journals Oral versus single intravenous bolus dose antibiotic prophylaxis against postoperative surgical site infection in external dacryocystorhinostomy for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction – A randomized study

2019 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devjyoti Tripathy ◽  
Jenil Sheth ◽  
Suryasnata Rath
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Bolus Dose ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Intravenous Bolus ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Duct Obstruction ◽  
Intravenous Bolus Dose ◽  
External Dacryocystorhinostomy

EP.TH.747Audit of antibiotic prophylaxis in groin hernia repair

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maitreyi Patel ◽  
Aleem O'Balogun ◽  
Naveed Kirmani
Keyword(s):  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Groin Hernia ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Groin Hernia Repair ◽  
Hernia Surgery ◽  
International Guidelines

Abstract Aims To review practice of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing groin hernia repair against the International guidelines for groin hernia management 2018, in order to improve compliance with International Guidelines. We also assessed the risk category of patients. Methods Retrospective data of all patients undergoing groin hernia repair from November 2019 to March 2020 was collected using hospital software. Data collected included patient demographics, details of hernia repair including; primary/recurrent hernia, emergency/elective, laparoscopic/open repair and use of mesh. The details of antibiotic prophylaxis were recorded. Descriptive statistics was used. Data was analyzed using Microsoft Excel. Results 67 patients were included, of which 38(57%) were high risk. 62 (92.5%) primary repairs were done, of which 48(72%) were open. 62(92.5%) were operated electively. 46(69%) patients underwent open repair with mesh, 6(9%) had open repair without mesh, while 15(22%) had laparoscopic repair with mesh. A total of 45 (67%) patient received antibiotic prophylaxis. Adherence to International guidelines for groin hernia in open hernia surgery was 82.67%, while that for laparoscopic surgery was 60%. Overall adherence to the Guidelines was 56.67%. Conclusions The audit reflects the need for improved understanding and adherence to the International Guidelines. Data collection of surgical site infection can help inform and influence practice to minimize the risk for surgical site infection and assist in better communication with patients regarding risk. Risk assessment for surgical site infection of patients prior to procedure helps to identify those with indication of antibiotic prophylaxis.

scholarly journals Non endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy versus external dacryocystorhinostomy

1970 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
BR Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Direct Method ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Successful Outcome ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
Duct Obstruction ◽  
Surgical Success ◽  
External Dacryocystorhinostomy

Aims and Objectives: To compare the success rates of non endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy and conventional external dacryocystorhinostomy for the surgical management of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Materials and methods: A retrospective, nonrandomized, comparative interventional case series of 302 patients who underwent either endonasal or external dacryocystorhinostomy over a period of 2 years. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon and patients with primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction with a minimum of 6 months post operative follow up were included in the study. While external dacryocystorhinostomy was performed using traditional technique, endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy was performed using direct method of nonendoscopic visualization. Results: Of the 302 cases included in the study 165 patients had endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy whereas 137 underwent external dacryocystorhinostomy. Success was defined by resolution of symptoms of tearing, a negative fluorescein dye disappearance test and patency of the canalicular system on lacrimal irrigation. In the external dacryocystorhinostomy group 124 (90.5%) patients had surgical success whereas 146 (88.5%) of the endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy patients had successful outcome. The overall success rate was 89.4%, and the difference of surgical success between the two groups was not statistically significant ( P=0.57). Conclusion: Non endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy gives surgical results comparable to those of external dacryocystorhinostomy and is a viable alternative where dacryocystorhinostomy is indicated for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Key words: Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy (ENDCR), External Dacryocystorhinostomy (EXDCR), Primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANLDO)   doi: 10.3126/kumj.v6i4.1731  Kathmandu University Medical Journal (2008), Vol. 6, No. 4, Issue 24, 437-442     

scholarly journals External dacryocystorhinostomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-185
Author(s):  
Li Ying Long ◽  
Safinaz Mohd Khialdin ◽  
Nazila Binti Ahmad Azli
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Duct Obstruction ◽  
Posterior Flap ◽  
External Dacryocystorhinostomy ◽  
External Dcr

Aim: To analyse the epidemiological data, surgical technique, success rate, and complications of patients who underwent external DCR in Hospital Selayang from January 2015 to December 2016. Method: Retrospective case series. Results: A total of 21 eyes of 20 patients who underwent external DCR from January 2015 to December 2016 were identified and reviewed. There were 15 females (75%) and 5 males (25%). Age ranged from 5 to 75 years old, with a median age of 56 years old (IQR 23). Twelve patients presented with epiphora while eight patients presented with symptoms of dacryocystitis. One case was congenital, two were secondary nasolacrimal duct obstruction and the rest were primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction. All patients underwent external DCR under general anaesthesia. Silicone tube were inserted in 21 eyes, of which all were removed 3 months after the surgery except one patient whom had his tube dislodged accidentally. The overall success rate was 90.5% (n = 19), which was defined as no or minimal intermittent epiphora or no reflux on lacrimal irrigation at 12 months postoperative. There was one patient who had a cerebrospinal fluid leak treated successfully with intravenous antibiotics. Conclusion: The surgical success rate for external dacryocystorhinostomy was comparable to that of the global success rate of external DCR. This is attributed to the application of surgical technique such as anterior suspended flap modification and posterior flap excision.

Reduction in Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis Expenditure and the Rate of Surgical Site Infection by Means of a Protocol That Controls the Use of Prophylaxis

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 1358-1365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marisa I. Gómez ◽  
Silvia I. Acosta-Gnass ◽  
Luisa Mosqueda-Barboza ◽  
Juan A Basualdo
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Final Stage ◽  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Prospective Survey ◽  
Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

Objective.To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention based on training and the use of a protocol with an automatic stop of antimicrobial prophylaxis to improve hospital compliance with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines.Design.An interventional study with a before-after trial was conducted in 3 stages: a 3-year initial stage (January 1999 to December 2001), during which a descriptive-prospective survey was performed to evaluate surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis and surgical site infections; a 6-month second stage (January to June 2002), during which an educational intervention was performed regarding the routine use of a surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis request form that included an automatic stop of prophylaxis (the “automatic-stop prophylaxis form”); and a 3-year final stage (July 2002 to June 2005), during which a descriptive-prospective survey of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis and surgical site infections was again performed.Setting.An 88-bed teaching hospital in Entre Ríos, Argentina.Patients.A total of 3,496 patients who underwent surgery were included in the first stage of the study and 3,982 were included in the final stage.Results.Comparison of the first stage of the study with the final stage revealed that antimicrobial prophylaxis was given at the appropriate time to 55% and 88% of patients, respectively (relative risk [RR], 0.27 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.25-0.30]; P < .01); the antimicrobial regimen was adequate in 74% and 87% of patients, respectively (RR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.45-0.55]; P < .01); duration of the prophylaxis was adequate in 44% and 55% of patients, respectively (RR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.77-0.84]; P < .01); and the surgical site infection rates were 3.2% and 1.9%, respectively (RR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.44-0.79]; P < .01). Antimicrobial expenditure was US$10,678.66 per 1,000 patient-days during the first stage and US$7,686.05 per 1,000 patient-days during the final stage (RR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.86-0.89]; P<.01).Conclusion.The intervention based on training and application of a protocol with an automatic stop of prophylaxis favored compliance with the hospital's current surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines before the intervention, achieving significant reductions of surgical site infection rates and substantial savings for the healthcare system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document