Alignment of buccally placed canine with modified transpalatal arch

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
MitaliBrijmohan Sharma ◽  
SuchitaTarvade Daokar
Keyword(s):  
2011 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-42
Author(s):  
Masato Fujisawa ◽  
Akira Komori
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-83
Author(s):  
Sharath Kumar Shetty ◽  
A Roginath Vigneshwaran ◽  
Y Mahesh Kumar
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 157 (5) ◽  
pp. 611-618
Author(s):  
Ingrid Müller Ledra ◽  
Luiz Gonzaga Gandini ◽  
Renato Parsekian Martins
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-112
Author(s):  
Ashish Gupta ◽  
Sridhar Kannan ◽  
Gaurav Gupta ◽  
Abhishek Goyaliya ◽  
Ankur Kaul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-290
Author(s):  
Abraham Thomas ◽  
Tawqueer Afshan ◽  
Tenzin Deru
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
pp. 683-689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaetana Raucci ◽  
Camila Pachêco-Pereira ◽  
Vincenzo Grassia ◽  
Fabrizia d’Apuzzo ◽  
Carlos Flores-Mir ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objective:  To evaluate short- and long-term maxillary dental arch dimensional changes in patients treated with a transpalatal arch (TPA) during mixed dentition followed by full fixed appliances in the permanent dentition compared with an untreated sample. Materials and Methods:  Dental casts and lateral cephalograms obtained from 36 consecutively treated patients before TPA treatment (T0), after TPA treatment (T1), after fixed appliance treatment (T2), and a minimum of 3 years after fixed appliance treatment (T3) were analyzed. The control group was matched as closely as possible. Arch widths, perimeter, and length, as well as crowding and incisor proclination, were evaluated. Results:  In the treated group, intercanine, interpremolar, and intermolar widths and arch perimeter increased significantly at T1. At T2, only the intercanine width increase was still significant. At T3 all arch dimensions decreased, remaining larger than they were at T0. The arch length increased after T1, significantly decreased at T2, and slightly decreased at T3. The crowding decreased significantly at T1, was eliminated at T2, and increased at T3. At T3, 50% of the patients showed relapse with crowding ranging from 0.5 to 2 mm. In the control group at T1, only slight changes were noted but crowding increased. At T2, crowding and upper incisor inclination increased but arch length decreased. At T3, intercuspid width, arch perimeter, and arch length continued to decrease, thereby increasing crowding. Conclusion:  Maxillary dental arch dimensions changed significantly after TPA followed by treatment with fixed appliances. Relapse occurred to some extent, especially in intercanine width and arch perimeter, but most of the dental arch changes remained stable.


2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 18e1-18e5
Author(s):  
Ana de Lourdes Sá de Lira ◽  
Sávio Prado ◽  
Mônica Tirre Araújo ◽  
Eduardo Franzotti Sant'Anna ◽  
Antonio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether palatal mini-implants are effective as direct anchorage for distal movement of the upper molars. METHODS: It was used an acrylic model of the upper dental arch. After making a groove in the region corresponding to dental alveolus, acrylic teeth were fixed in groove with #7 wax, with the roots being previously immersed in adhesive wax. The orthodontic appliance was placed according to the Edgewise technique and then a mini-implant (SIN, São Paulo, Brazil) was inserted at the site corresponding to the palatal raphe. A 0.019 x 0.025-in stainless steel archwire was made and attached to the upper arch with elastics. A transpalatal arch bar (0.019 x 0.025in) was mounted and two hooks were soldered to it in order to retain chain elastics (Unitek, Brazil) to be connected to the mini-implant under a force of 1.5 N on each side. The maxillary model was immersed in water 40 times and photographed after each immersion, for observation of dental movements. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test were employed for analyzing the obtained data. RESULTS: Molars displaced distally 3.1 mm, in average, with distal inclination ranging from 3 to 5 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Molar movements occurred due to distal inclination, with a slight rotation and no extrusive effect.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (24) ◽  
pp. 11749
Author(s):  
Ornnicha Pooktuantong ◽  
Takeshi Ogasawara ◽  
Masayoshi Uezono ◽  
Pintu-on Chantarawaratit ◽  
Keiji Moriyama

An anterior open bite is one of the most difficult malocclusions in orthodontic treatment. For such malocclusion, orthodontic miniscrew insertion into both buccal and palatal alveolar regions has been indicated for molar intrusion, but it involves a risk of tooth root injury. To solve the problem, a midpalatal miniscrew-attached extension arm (MMEA) is adopted. However, this method causes palatal tipping of the molar because intrusive loads were applied only from the palatal side. Currently, a transpalatal arch is added to avoi0d tipping movement, but it induces the patient’s discomfort. Hence, the objective of this study was to evaluate the loading conditions for maxillary molar intrusion without tipping movement, only by MMEA through finite element (FE) analysis. FE models of maxillary right first molar and surrounding tissues were created. Three hook positions of MMEA were set at 6.0 mm perpendicular intervals in the occluso-apical direction along the mucosal contour. An intrusive unit load was applied from the palatal side of the molar, and various counter loads were applied from the buccal side. An optimal counter load for molar intrusion without palatal tipping was observed in each hook position. In conclusion, an ideal maxillary molar intrusion can be achieved only by MMEA with an optimal counter load.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document