Atlas instrumentation guided by the medial edge of the posterior arch: An anatomic and radiologic study

Background:Infectious spondylodiscitis is a therapeutic emergency and is a current problem. It can affect the different levels of the spine. Multifocal forms, touching several floors, however remain rare.Objectives:To compare the clinical, biological, radiological and therapeutic aspects of unifocal versus multifocal spondylodiscitis.Methods:This is a retrospective study of 113 patients admitted to our service over a period of 20 years [1998-2018]. The diagnosis of spondylodiscitis was made on the basis of clinical, biological, radiological and bacteriological data. We have divided our population into two groups: unifocal and multifocal spondylodiscitis.Results:Spondylodiscitis was more frequently unifocal (75.2%) than multifocal (24.8%). The average age of the patients was 55.8 years. There were 62 men and 51 women. There was no difference in age and sex between the two groups (p=0.5 and p=0.8, respectively).Diabetes was more frequent in the group of multifocal spondylodiscitis but with no statistically significant difference (p=0.4). No statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the start mode (p=0.7), the schedule (p=0.3), the presence of neurological signs (p=0.7), fever (p = 0.2), impaired general condition (p=0.6) and biological inflammatory syndrome (p=0.6).Cervical and dorsal spine involvement was more common in multifocal spondylodiscitis (p = 0.02 and p = 0.01; respectively). There were 11 spondylodiscitis involving 2 floors (cervical and dorsal: 2 cases, cervical and lumbar: 3 cases, dorsal and lumbar: 6 cases) and 3 spondylodiscitis involving 3 floors.Radiologically, the presence of vertebral fracture and involvement of the posterior arch was more frequent during the multifocal form (p=0.03 and p=0.001; respectively). The frequency of para-vertebral abscesses, epiduritis and the presence of spinal cord compression were similar in the two groups (p=0.6; p=0.7 and p=0.2, respectively).Tuberculosis was more frequent during the multifocal form (p = 0.05) and brucellosis during the unifocal form (p = 0.03). Disco-vertebral biopsy was performed in 79 cases. It was more often contributory during multifocal spondylodiscitis (p = 0.03).The occurrence of immediate complications was more frequent in multifocal spondylodiscitis but with no statistically significant difference (p=0.2).Conclusion:Multifocal sppondylodiscitis is seen mainly in immunocompromised subjects. Our study found that diabetes is the most common factor in immunosuppression. Note also the predominance of involvement of the posterior elements, tuberculous origin and immediate complications.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Download Full-text

Posterior Midline Approach for a C2 Schwannoma: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

Operative Neurosurgery ◽

10.1093/ons/opaa409 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Sorin Aldea ◽

Abdu Alkhairy ◽

Irina Joitescu ◽

Caroline Le Guerinel

Keyword(s):

Posterior Approach ◽

Main Step ◽

Surgical Removal ◽

Posterior Arch ◽

Favorable Result ◽

Lateral Compression ◽

Bone Removal ◽

Far Lateral ◽

Midline Approach ◽

Posterior Midline

Abstract C2 schwannomas are rare lesions that may develop in the spinal canal, in the area of the C2 ganglion situated posterior to the C1C2 articulation, in the extraspinal area or in a combination of these 3 sectors.1,2 The surgical removal of these lesions is delicate because of the intimate relationships the schwannomas develop with the V3 segment of the vertebral artery. A variety of lateral, far-lateral, or extreme lateral approaches have been described in order to tackle these lesions. We use a posterior midline approach that takes advantage of the predominantly extradural development of C2 schwannomas. In this technique, the main step is the debulking of the posterior articular sector of the tumor, which is easily accessible through a midline posterior approach and necessitates minimal bone removal. In most cases, removal of the homolateral posterior arch of C1 is sufficient in order to create an adequate access. These maneuvers create the necessary space for dissecting both the intradural and extraspinal sectors of the schwannoma. We present this technique through a case with a minimal intradural component exerting mainly a lateral compression of the spinal cord. The tumor was operated through the midline mini-invasive posterior approach with a favorable result. We demonstrate the surgical technique in video and discuss the nuances.

Download Full-text

Resection of a Lower Clival Meningioma via Posterolateral Approach: Two-Dimensional Operative Video

Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull Base ◽

10.1055/s-0040-1714407 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Pinar E. Ocak ◽

Selcuk Yilmazlar

Keyword(s):

Cranial Nerve ◽

Cranial Nerves ◽

Posterolateral Approach ◽

Left Vertebral Artery ◽

Posterior Arch ◽

Upper Cervical Spine ◽

Two Dimensional ◽

Lower Cranial Nerve ◽

Complex Anatomy ◽

Microsurgical Resection

Abstract Objectives This study aimed to demonstrate resection of a craniovertebral junction (CVJ) meningioma via the posterolateral approach. Design The study is designed with a two-dimensional operative video. Setting This study is conducted at department of neurosurgery in a university hospital. Participants A 50-year-old woman who presented with lower cranial nerve findings due to a left-sided lower clival meningioma (Fig. 1). Main Outcome Measures Microsurgical resection of the meningioma and preservation of the neurovascular structures. Results The patient was placed in park-bench position and a left-sided retrosigmoid suboccipital craniotomy, followed by C1 hemilaminectomy and unroofing the lip of the foramen magnum, was performed. The dural incision extended from the suboccipital region down to the posterior arch of C2 (Fig. 2). The arachnoid overlying the tumor was incised, revealing the course of the cranial nerve (CN) XI on the dorsolateral aspect of the tumor. The left vertebral artery (VA) was encased by the tumor which was originating from the dura below the jugular foramen. The mass was resected in a piecemeal fashion eventually. At the end of the procedure, all relevant cranial nerves and adjacent vascular structures were intact. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed total resection and the patient was discharged home on postoperative day 3 safely. Conclusions Microsurgical resection of the lesions of the CVJ are challenging as this transition zone between the cranium and upper cervical spine has a complex anatomy. Since adequate exposure of the extradural and intradural segments of the VA can be obtained by the posterolateral approach, this approach can be preferred in cases with tumors anterior to the VA or when the artery is encased by the tumor.The link to the video can be found at: https://youtu.be/d3u5Qrc-zlM.

Download Full-text