scholarly journals Surgical scar revision using silicone gel sheet as an adjunct

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Tripti Mukherjee ◽  
Sumit Chopra ◽  
Ankit Aggarwal ◽  
Vipul Garg ◽  
Himani Dadwal ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Jian Jin ◽  
Tao Tang ◽  
Hao Zhou ◽  
Xu-Dong Hong ◽  
Hao Fan ◽  
...  

Abstract Both silicone gel and quercetin are effective in scar treatment but have different action mechanisms. Quercetin is mainly applied in the gel form and can lead to poor adhesion of silicone gel sheet; therefore, they cannot be combined in clinical use. In this study, a silicone gel sheet that releases quercetin in a sustained manner for 48 hours was successfully developed. Four round scars (Ø: 1 cm) were made in the ears of New-Zealand albino rabbits (n=10). After scar healing, the rabbits were divided into four groups: blank control group with no treatment, silicone gel sheet group with dressing change every 2 days, quercetin group with dressing change 3 times daily, and combination treatment group with dressing change every 2 days. Scar assessment was performed 3 months later. Transepidermal water loss showed no difference between the combination treatment group and the silicone gel sheet group, but was lower than that in the quercetin group and the blank control group. Immunohistochemistry of CD 31 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen showed the following results: combination treatment group < silicone gel sheet group = quercetin group < blank control group. Polymerase chain reaction results showed that the expression of type-I and type-III collagen in the combination treatment group and the quercetin group was significantly lower than that in the other two groups. Thus, quercetin-modified silicone gel sheet combines the advantages of the two treatments and is more effective at inhibiting cell proliferation in scar tissue than either of the two treatments alone.


2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Somesh Gupta ◽  
Shilpa Garg ◽  
Naveen Dahiya
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 143 (3) ◽  
pp. 902-911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Moortgat ◽  
Jill Meirte ◽  
Koen Maertens ◽  
Cynthia Lafaire ◽  
Lieve De Cuyper ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Grella ◽  
Gianfranco Nicoletti ◽  
Antonio D'Ari ◽  
Vincenza Romanucci ◽  
Mariangela Santoro ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S78-S78
Author(s):  
Ingrid Parry ◽  
Soman Sen ◽  
Tina L Palmieri ◽  
David G Greenhalgh ◽  
Kathleen S Romanowski

Abstract Introduction Silicone sheets are commonly used for prevention and treatment of burn scars and silicone-based products have recently been recommended as the gold standard non-invasive treatment choice. One problem with silicone gel sheets application is that the sheets lose their adhesive qualities making them difficult to affix to the patient and costly to replace when lost. A new ultra-thin, clear and adhesive silicone gel sheet layered on a semi-permeable polyester backing was trialed at our burn center. The silicone is designed to be a one-time application, worn during all activities until it naturally falls off, thus eliminating the need for daily removal and cleaning. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the single-use adhesive silicone sheets with pediatric burn survivors. Methods Medical records of pediatric burn survivors who used the adherent silicone sheets between September 2019 and July 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Information regarding details of silicone use and scar outcome scores were extracted from the records. Data were analyzed using paired Student t-tests and Wilcoxon Signed Rank to compare scars before and after using the silicone. Results The silicone was applied to 22 body areas of 9 patients. The average age of the patients was 7.4 (±8.5) years and TBSA 53 ±17%. The time from injury or grafting to when the silicone was applied was 200.5 (±13.4) days. The silicone was worn without interruption for an average of 12.8 days. Total Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) scores for both the patient and observer evaluations significantly improved after use with the single-use adherent silicone (↓13.83 patient p=.005, ↓5.4 observer p=.01). Evaluating individual scar parameters showed 4/7 patient reported and observed areas of the POSAS evaluation improved significantly with adherent silicone use (Figure 1). Only one patient reported a complication of itch at day 5 and the silicone was removed. Conclusions The single-use adhesive silicone investigated in this study appears to adequately adhere to patients over multiple days, thus overcoming common barriers to silicone use of the products falling off, getting lost and needing to be replaced. Use of such a product could improve ease and continuity with scar management. In addition, for this small cohort of patients, scar improvement was noted with silicone use. The results of this study indicate that larger prospective studies evaluating the silicone efficacy may be beneficial.


2016 ◽  
Vol 137 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun Young Rha ◽  
Yun Ho Kim ◽  
Tae-Jung Kim ◽  
Gyeol Yoo ◽  
Jong Won Rhie ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document