Locating the edges of magnetized sources provides a fundamental tool in the geologic interpretation of magnetic field data. Much recent effort has been expended on developing improvements to existing edge-detection methods, resulting in purported increases in accuracy and continuity along edges, reduction of noise effects, and limiting the influences of variable depth to source, magnetization direction, and source dip. These endeavors are valuable and provide interpreters with a wider range of tools to carry out geologic interpretations of aeromagnetic data. Nevertheless, survey parameters such as flight height and line spacing impose limits on the quality of edge locations that can be achieved. Using model studies, we quantify the effects that source size, depth, and interference between sources have on calculated edge locations. Based on the known behavior of established edge detectors, we found that many of the newer approaches offer limited advantages over older methods. Consequently, we studied an example of field mapping of geologic contacts in the Canadian Shield, supported by aeromagnetic data, using calculation of a standard edge detector: the horizontal gradient magnitude of the total magnetic field or TF-hgm. Calculated edge locations estimated from this method appear sufficiently accurate and continuous to provide a solid basis on which the mapping campaign was based and executed successfully.
San José de Guaviare Syenite, Colombia: Repeated Ediacaran intrusions in the northwestern Amazonian Craton