2019 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Erika Lokatt ◽  
Charlotte Holgersson ◽  
Monica Lindgren ◽  
Johann Packendorff ◽  
Louise Hagander

Abstract In this article we develop a theoretical perspective of how professional identities in multi-professional organisational settings are co-constructed in daily interactions. The research reported here is located in a healthcare context where overlapping knowledge bases, unclear divisions of responsibilities, and an increased managerialist emphasis on teamwork make interprofessional boundaries in healthcare operations more complex and blurred than ever. We thereby build on a research tradition that recognises the healthcare sector as a negotiated order, specifically studying how professional identities are invoked, constructed, and re-constructed in everyday work interactions. The perspective is employed in an analysis of qualitative data from interviews and participant observation at a large Swedish hospital, in which we find three main processes in the construction of space of action: hierarchical, inclusive, and pseudo-inclusive. In most of the interactions, existing inter-professional divides and power relations are sustained, preventing developments towards integrated interprofessional teamwork.


2017 ◽  
pp. 245-262
Author(s):  
Anselm L. Strauss ◽  
David R. Maines

Evaluation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 399-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gill Callaghan
Keyword(s):  

Urban Life ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 328-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter M. Hall ◽  
Dee Ann Spencer-Hall

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesley McAra ◽  
Susan McVie

This article explores the role which formal and informal regulatory orders play in the development of offender identity. Drawing on quantitative and qualitative data from the Edinburgh Study of Youth Transitions and Crime, it argues that the cultural practices of formal orders (such as those imposed by schools and the police) and informal orders (such as the rules governing peer interactions) mirror each other in respect of their fundamental dynamics – animated primarily by an inclusionary–exclusionary imperative. Formal orders differentiate between categories of young people on the basis of class and suspiciousness. Informal orders differentiate between individuals on the basis of adherence to group norms, territorial sovereignty, and gender appropriate demeanour. Being excluded by either set of orders undermines the capacity of the individual to negotiate, limits autonomy and constrains choice. This renders the individual more likely to absorb identities ascribed to them with damaging consequences in terms of offending behaviour and the individual’s sense of self.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document