Free Subgroups and the Residual Nilpotence of the Group of Units of Modular and p-Adic Group Rings

1986 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jairo Zacarias Gonçalves

AbstractLet G be a group, let RG be the group ring of the group G over the unital commutative ring R and let U(RG) be its group of units. Conditions which imply that U(RG) contains no free noncyclic group are studied, when R is a field of characteristic p ≠ 0, not algebraic over its prime field, and G is a solvable-by-finite group without p-elements. We also consider the case R = ℤp, the ring of p-adic integers and G torsionby- nilpotent torsion free group. Finally, the residual nilpotence of U(ℤpG) is investigated.

1984 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 309-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jairo Zacarias Gonçalves

AbstractIn this paper we give necessary and sufficient conditions under which the group of units of a group ring of a finite group G over a field K does not contain a free subgroup of rank 2.Some extensions of this results to infinite nilpotent and FC groups are also considered.


1980 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 596-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald H. Cliff

We consider the following problem: If KG is the group ring of a torsion free group over a field K,show that KG has no divisors of zero. At characteristic zero, major progress was made by Brown [2], who solved the problem for G abelian-by-finite, and then by Farkas and Snider [4], who considered Gpolycyclic-by-finite. Here we present a solution at nonzero characteristic for polycyclic-by-finite groups. We also show that if Khas characteristic p > 0 and G is polycyclic-by-finite with only p-torsion, then KG has no idempotents other than 0 or 1. Finally we show that if R is a commutative ring of nonzero characteristic without nontrivial idempotents and G is polycyclic-by-finite such that no element different from 1 in G has order invertible in R, then RG has no nontrivial idempotents. This is proved at characteristic zero in [3].


1980 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 1342-1352 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Hartley ◽  
P. F. Pickel

Let G be a group, ZG the group ring of G over the ring Z of integers, and U(ZG) the group of units of ZG. One method of investigating U(ZG) is to choose some property of groups and try to determine the groups G such that U(ZG) enjoys that property. For example Sehgal and Zassenhaus [9] have given necessary and sufficient conditions for U(ZG) to be nilpotent (see also [7]), and the same authors have investigated when U(ZG) is an FC (finite-conjugate) group [10]. For a survey of related questions, see [3]. In this paper we consider when U(ZG) contains a free subgroup of rank 2. We conjecture that if this does not happen, then every finite subgroup of G is normal, from which various other conclusions then follow (see Lemma 4).


1976 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 954-960 ◽  
Author(s):  
César Polcino Milies

Let R be a ring with unit element and G a finite group. We denote by RG the group ring of the group G over R and by U(RG) the group of units of this group ring.The study of the nilpotency of U(RG) has been the subject of several papers.


2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (06) ◽  
pp. 1350004 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAIRO Z. GONÇALVES ◽  
ÁNGEL DEL RÍO

In this survey we revise the methods and results on the existence and construction of free groups of units in group rings, with special emphasis in integral group rings over finite groups and group algebras. We also survey results on constructions of free groups generated by elements which are either symmetric or unitary with respect to some involution and other results on which integral group rings have large subgroups which can be constructed with free subgroups and natural group operations.


1993 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 367-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Jespers ◽  
M. M. Parmenter

LetGbe a finite group,(ZG) the group of units of the integral group ring ZGand1(ZG) the subgroup of units of augmentation 1. In this paper, we are primarily concerned with the problem of describing constructively(ZG) for particular groupsG.This has been done for a small number of groups (see [11] for an excellent survey), and most recently Jespers and Leal [3] described(ZG) for several 2-groups. While the situation is clear for all groups of order less than 16, not all groups of order 16 were discussed in their paper. Our main aim is to complete the description of(ZG) for all groups of order 16. Since the structure of the unit group of abelian groups is very well known (see for example [10]), we are only interested in the non-abelian case.


1985 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jairo Zacarias Gonçalves

Author(s):  
BERNHARD KÖCK

Let R be a commutative ring, Γ a finite group acting on R, and let k∈ℕ be invertible in R. Generalizing a definition of Kervaire, we construct an Adams operation ψk on the Grothendieck group and on the higher K-theory of projective modules over the twisted group ring R#Γ. For this, we generalize Atiyah's cyclic power operations and use shuffle products in higher K-theory. For the Grothendieck group, we show that ψk is multiplicative and that it commutes with base change, with the Cartan homomorphism, and with ψl for any other l which is invertible in R.


1980 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. F. Smith

Let k be a field and G an Abelian group of finite torsion-free rank. Brewer, Costa and Lady [1, Theorem A] showed that if k has characteristic 0 then each Localization of the group algebra kG at a prime ideal is a regular local ring. They also showed (in the same theorem) that if k has characteristic p>0, then kG is locally Joetherian (i.e. each localization of kG at a prime ideal is a Noetherian ring) if and only if G is an extension of a finitely generated group by a torsion p′-group. The purpose of this note is to examine this theorem in a more general setting.


1973 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 366-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Formanek

If G is a torsion–free group and F is a field, is the group ring F[G] a ring without zero divisors? This is true if G is an ordered group or various generalizations thereof - beyond this the question remains untouched. This paper proves a related result.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document