The Effects of Homeopathic Medicines on Reducing the Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression: Randomized, Double Blind and Placebo Controlled

2015 ◽  
Vol 03 (04) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mandana Bagherian
2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (13) ◽  
pp. S118
Author(s):  
Maryam Shemshian ◽  
Akram Sadeghi ◽  
Tayebeh Kermani ◽  
Hadi Musavi Seyed ◽  
Shima Tavalaie ◽  
...  

Medicines ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 56
Author(s):  
Meredith Blampied ◽  
Caroline Bell ◽  
Claire Gilbert ◽  
Joseph Boden ◽  
Rebecca Nicholls ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 162 (4) ◽  
pp. 543-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. M. Mayo ◽  
W. Falkowski ◽  
C. A. H. Jones

In a double-blind crossover study of 26 long-stay schizophrenic patients, no correlation was found between caffeine consumption and levels of anxiety and depression. No significant changes in patients' behaviour or levels of anxiety and depression occurred when the wards changed to decaffeinated products. Serum caffeine levels confirmed compliance. No evidence was found to support a removal of caffeinated products from this group of patients.


1965 ◽  
Vol 111 (471) ◽  
pp. 134-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. H. Grosser ◽  
E. Ryan

Following the introduction of imipramine hydrochloride as the first specific thymoleptic drug, further compounds related to the iminodibenzyl family were developed. One of these was an iminostilbene derivative with a piperazine sidechain: opipramol (Insidon, Geigy), which has the formula 4-[3-(5H-dibenzo[b,f] azepine-5-yl)-propyl]-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-piperazine-dihydrochloride (Schindler and Blattner, 1961). The nucleus is almost identical to that of imipramine and the sidechain is identical to that of perphenazine. This compound has since been used by a number of Continental and American investigators. They have claimed thymoleptic, neuroleptic and tranquillizing properties for the drug. Some authors found an antidepressive effect inferior to that of imipramine (Schneider and Villa, 1961; Racamier, 1962); others considered it superior to imipramine in that it causes fewer side-effects and helps patients unresponsive to imipramine (Schmitt et al., 1962). Most workers mention a mild sedative effect. Donzallaz (1961) achieved most favourable results treating “psycho-autonomic disturbances”, and Hoff (1962) reported good effects on neurasthenic patients with depressive traits. All these studies were uncontrolled and, on the whole, rather impressionistic. The only blind trial known to us was done by S. R. Splitter (1963), who gave opipramol and placebo on a double-blind basis to 100 medical out-patients suffering from various disorders, with or without psychosomatic symptoms, and also exhibiting some degree of anxiety and depression. Using concomitant drug therapy as required in about half his cases, he observed excellent or good responses of target symptoms including depression, anxiety and psychosomatic complaints, as well as amelioration of any physiologic disorder in 94 per cent. of the opipramol group as against 4 per cent. in the placebo group. However Splitter's material covered a large number of divergent conditions such as adolescent behaviour problems, diabetes and cancer; they were insufficiently matched for diagnosis and apparently not at all for age.


1986 ◽  
Vol 19 (03) ◽  
pp. 115-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Amsterdam ◽  
W. Case ◽  
E. Csanalosi ◽  
M. Singer ◽  
K. Rickels

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 1533-1539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan G. Ball ◽  
Sarah Lipsius ◽  
Rodrigo Escobar

ABSTRACTBackground:The Generalized Anxiety Inventory (GAI) has been developed for use in the assessment of anxiety symptoms in older adults (≥ 65 years), but previous validation work has not examined the psychometric qualities of the instrument in relation to treatment. The objective of this study was to examine the performance of the GAI for its internal reliability, convergent and divergent validity, and its sensitivity to treatment.Methods:Elderly patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) participated in a 10-week double-blind study of duloxetine treatment for patients with GAD. Anxiety symptoms were assessed with the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) anxiety and depression subscales, and the GAI. Internal reliability of the GAI was assessed with Cronbach's α. Correlations among the HAMA, HADS, and GAI scores were analyzed to determine convergent and divergent validity. Patients were also compared on remission status using recommended cut-off scores for the GAI.Results:Patients with GAD, who were at least 65 years of age, were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with either duloxetine (N = 151) or placebo (N = 140) for 10 weeks acute therapy. The mean change on the GAI was significantly greater with duloxetine compared with placebo treatment (−8.36 vs. −4.96, respectively, p ≤ 0.001). The GAI demonstrated good internal consistency, good convergent and divergent validity, but suggested cut-off values for caseness with the GAI did not correspond to remission status as measured by the HAMA.Conclusions:Within an elderly patient population with GAD, the GAI demonstrated sound psychometric qualities and sensitivity to change with treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document