scholarly journals Does Emotional Expressivity Predict Somatization?

2018 ◽  
Vol 04 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hossein Kaviani
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Veilleux ◽  
Garrett Pollert ◽  
kayla skinner ◽  
Danielle Baker ◽  
Kaitlyn Chamberlain ◽  
...  

The beliefs people hold about emotion are clearly relevant for emotional processes, although the social psychological research on malleability or “lay” beliefs about emotion are rarely integrated with the clinical research on emotional schemas. In the current study, we examine a variety of beliefs about emotion (e.g., beliefs that emotions can be changed, beliefs that negative emotions are bad, beliefs that emotions should not be expressed, beliefs that emotions control behavior, beliefs that emotions last “forever”) along with other emotion belief measures and measures of psychopathology (general psychological distress, borderline personality), emotion dysregulation, interpersonal emotional attributions (emotional expressivity, interpersonal emotion regulation) and psychological flexibility (mindfulness, emotional intelligence). In a combined sample of undergraduates (n = 162) and adults from Mechanical Turk (n = 197), we found that beliefs about the longevity and uniqueness of emotions were unique predictors of psychopathology, even after controlling for age and gender. We also found that after controlling for symptoms of psychopathology, beliefs about longevity and that negative emotions are bad predicted greater emotion dysregulation and lower mindfulness. Beliefs that emotions should be kept to the self and a preference of logic over emotion predicted less emotional expressivity, interpersonal emotion regulation, and emotional intelligence. Beliefs that emotions control behavior also predicted lower mindfulness. Finally, when asked whether they think their beliefs change during strong emotions, people who said their beliefs change (about two-thirds of the sample) reported higher symptoms of psychopathology, higher emotion dysregulation, higher use of interpersonal regulation strategies and lower mindfulness.


2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carisa Perry-Parrish ◽  
Tracy E. Waasdorp ◽  
Catherine P. Bradshaw

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yousong Hu ◽  
Shuyang Dong ◽  
Fang Guan ◽  
Outong Chen ◽  
Jun Chen ◽  
...  

This study aimed at examining the differences between Chinese youths with hearing loss (HL) and with typical hearing (TH) in emotion understanding (EU), parental emotional expressivity, and the associations between EU and parental emotional expressivity. The participants were 282 youths with HL (14.58 ± 3.42 years old) and 350 youths with TH (11.69 ± 2.49 years old). EU was measured by four visual-mode tasks, of which two involve language comprehension while the others do not. Parents reported positive and negative emotional expressivity on the Self-Expressiveness in the Family Questionnaire. Covariates were controlled for including socioeconomic status, parent gender, youth gender, age, intelligence, and teacher-reported comprehension difficulties. Results showed that the four EU tasks were more challenging for the youths with HL than for the youths with TH. The interaction effect of the two groups × 4 tasks was not significant, suggesting that the differences between the two groups of youths in EU were generally similar across the four tasks. The parents of the youths with HL did not differ from the parents of the youths with TH in how often they displayed positive and negative emotional expressivity. Multigroup regression analyses revealed that negative emotional expressivity was negatively related to EU in the youths with HL but not in the youths with TH. However, these two regression coefficients were not significantly different. Positive emotional expressivity was not related to EU in either group. In conclusion, this study extends the knowledge about the EU of Chinese youths with HL and emotion-related socialization of the parents of these youths.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwang-Ho Lee ◽  
Sunghyup Sean Hyun

2021 ◽  
pp. 138-166
Author(s):  
Agnes Celle ◽  
Anne Jugnet ◽  
Laure Lansari

This chapter explores expressive questions in English and French. It is usage-based and draws upon a sample of naturally occurring data. It focuses on what the hell questions in English and mais qu’est-ce que questions in French. A distinction is made between two types of expressivity, which have been labeled emotional expressivity and iconic expressivity. They both convey intensification and may operate at the lexical, discursive, semantic, or syntactic levels. In what the hell questions, the left periphery is a core area for activating expressivity, while in mais qu’est-ce que questions, expressivity markers are varied and not restricted to the left periphery. Iconic expressivity is claimed to be unrelated to the speaker’s emotional attitude and triggered by enactment markers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document