scholarly journals Incorporation of Whole Spine Screening in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocols for Low Back Pain: A Valuable Addition

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 700-705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akhilesh Rao ◽  
Atul Mishra ◽  
Yayati Pimpalwar ◽  
Ravinder Sahdev ◽  
Neha Yadu

<sec><title>Study Design</title><p>A retrospective review of lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies conducted at the Department of Radiodiagnosis &amp; Imaging of a Tertiary Care Armed Forces Hospital between May 2014 and May 2016.</p></sec><sec><title>Purpose</title><p>To assess the advantages of incorporating sagittal screening of the whole spine in protocols for conventional lumbar spine MRI for patients presenting with low back pain.</p></sec><sec><title>Overview of Literature</title><p>Advances in MRI have resulted in faster examinations, particularly for patients with low back pain. The additional detection of incidental abnormalities on MRI helps to improve patient outcomes by providing a swifter definitive diagnosis. Because low back pain is extremely common, any change to the diagnostic and treatment approach has a significant impact on health care resources.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>We documented all additional incidental findings detected on sagittal screenings of the spine that were of clinical significance and would otherwise have been undiagnosed.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>A total of 1,837 patients who met our inclusion criteria underwent MRI of the lumbar spine. The mean age of the study population was 45.7 years; 66.8% were men and 33.2% women. Approximately 26.7% of the patients were diagnosed with incidental findings. These included determining the level of indeterminate vertebrae, incidental findings of space-occupying lesions of the cervicothoracic spine, myelomalacic changes, and compression fractures at cervicothoracic levels.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>We propose that T2-weighted sagittal screening of the whole spine be included as a routine sequence when imaging the lumbosacral spine for suspected degenerative pathology of the intervertebral discs.</p></sec>

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osama Al-saeed ◽  
Khaled Al-Jarallah ◽  
Maryam Raeess ◽  
Mehraj Sheikh ◽  
Mohammed Ismail ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 892-897
Author(s):  
Asra Shaikh ◽  
Sohail Ahmed Khan ◽  
Munawar Hussain ◽  
Sadia Soomro ◽  
Hatem Adel ◽  
...  

<sec><title>Study Design</title><p>Descriptive cross-sectional study.</p></sec><sec><title>Purpose</title><p>To determine the frequency of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) in patients with low back pain (LBP) and the role of iliolumbar ligament (ILL) origin from L5 in LSTV cases.</p></sec><sec><title>Overview of Literature</title><p>Transitional vertebrae are developmental variants of the spine. LSTV is a common congenital abnormality, and failure to recognize this anomaly may result in serious consequences during surgery.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>All patients aged 11–90 years of either gender with LBP for any duration, who presented for X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbosacral spine, were included. X-rays of the lumbosacral spine in anteroposterior and lateral views were acquired. In addition, T1- and T2-weighted sagittal and axial MRI was performed. Images were evaluated on a workstation.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Of 504 patients, transitional vertebrae were observed in 75 patients (15%). Among them, 39 (52%) patients had Castellvi type III and 36 (48%) patients had Castellvi type II. However, on MRI, 42 (56%) patients had O'Driscoll type II, 18 (24%) patients had O'Driscoll type IV, and 15 patients (20%) had O'Driscoll type III. ILL origin from L5 was significantly higher (n=429, 100%) among patients with a normal lumbosacral junction than among patients with a transitional lumbosacral junction (n=22, 29.3%) (p&lt;0.001).</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>LSTV occurs at a high frequency in patients with LBP. Furthermore, in the presence of LSTV, the ILL is not a reliable marker for the identification of L5.</p></sec>


2001 ◽  
Vol 83 (9) ◽  
pp. 1306-1311 ◽  
Author(s):  
David G. Borenstein ◽  
James W. O'Mara ◽  
Scott D. Boden ◽  
William C. Lauerman ◽  
Alan Jacobson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document