Impulse Oscillometry Findings and Their Associations With Lung Ultrasound Signs in COVID-19 Survivors

2021 ◽  
pp. respcare.09193
Author(s):  
Agnaldo J Lopes ◽  
Thiago T Mafort ◽  
Mariana S da Cal ◽  
Laura B Monnerat ◽  
Patrícia F Litrento ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e0260679
Author(s):  
Agnaldo José Lopes ◽  
Patrícia Frascari Litrento ◽  
Bruna Cuoco Provenzano ◽  
Alícia Sales Carneiro ◽  
Laura Braga Monnerat ◽  
...  

Background Thousands of people worldwide are suffering the consequences of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), and impulse oscillometry (IOS) and lung ultrasound (LUS) might be important tools for the follow-up of this population. Our objective was to prospectively evaluate abnormalities detected using these two methods in a cohort of COVID-19 survivors with respiratory symptoms. Methods In this follow-up study, 59 patients underwent clinical evaluations, spirometry, IOS and LUS in the 2nd (M1) and 5th (M2) months after diagnostic confirmation of COVID-19 by real-time reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction. Aeration scores were obtained from the LUS exams based on the following findings: B-lines >2, coalescent B-lines, and subpleural consolidations. Results Fifty-nine (100%) participants had cough and/or dyspnea at M1, which decreased to 38 (64.4%) at M2 (p = 0.0001). Spirometry was abnormal in 26 (44.1%) and 20 (33.9%) participants at M1 and M2, respectively, although without statistical significance (p = 0.10). Normal examination, restrictive patterns, and obstructive patterns were observed in 33 (55.9%), 18 (30.5%), and 8 (13.6%) participants, respectively, at M1 and in 39 (66.1%), 13 (22%), and 7 (11.9%) participants at M2 (p = 0.14). Regarding IOS, considering changes in resistive and reactive parameters, abnormal exams were detected in 52 (88.1%) and 42 (71.2%) participants at M1 and M2, respectively (p = 0.002). Heterogeneity of resistance between 4 and 20 Hz >20% was observed in 38 (64.4%) and 33 (55.9%) participants at M1 and M2, respectively (p = 0.30). Abnormal LUS was observed in 46 (78%) and 36 (61%) participants at M1 and M2, respectively (p = 0.002), with a reduction in aeration scores between M1 and M2 [5 (2–8) vs. 3 (0–6) points, p<0.0001]. Conclusions IOS and LUS abnormalities are frequent in the first 5 months post-COVID-19 infection; however, when prospectively evaluated, significant improvement is evident in the parameters measured by these two methods.


Author(s):  
Yale Tung Chen ◽  
Milagros Martí de Gracia ◽  
Maria Luz Parra Gordo ◽  
Silvia Ossaba Velez ◽  
Sergio Agudo-Fernández

Author(s):  
N Buda ◽  
M Piskunowicz ◽  
M Porzezińska ◽  
W Kosiak ◽  
Z Zdrojewski

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document