scholarly journals Factors affecting external information-seeking behavior of a public projects

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-72
Author(s):  
Kyosuke Ohana ◽  
Hiroe Maeda
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24166-e24166
Author(s):  
Rushad Patell ◽  
David Johnson Einstein ◽  
Eric James Miller ◽  
Jennifer Halleck ◽  
Laura Dodge ◽  
...  

e24166 Background: Patients receiving palliative cancer treatment frequently misperceive likelihood of benefits/toxicity. Physicians fear that external sources of information regarding treatment enhance misperceptions and complicate decision-making. We investigated the sources of external information used, how much it affects patients' misperception and influences their treatment choices. Methods: We prospectively surveyed patients with advanced solid cancers and their oncologists regarding benefits/risks of palliative therapies including likelihood of tumor response and toxicity. Patients reported information-seeking behavior pre-treatment. We compared patients’ perceptions of benefits/risks to that of their oncologists. Results: Across four disease groups, 119 eligible patients enrolled. Their median age was 65 years (range 59–73), 55% were male, and 56% had undergone prior treatment. Treatments included chemotherapy (61%), targeted therapy (15%), and immunotherapy (24%). Over two thirds, 69% of participants stated that they wanted as much as possible information from their oncologist, and nearly all (95%) stated that they felt the amount of information provided by their clinician was “just right.” However, 60% wanted at least a moderate amount of information from external sources, and 58% reported obtaining information from sources other than their oncologist. The most common external sources of information used by participants were printed materials (35%), word of mouth (26%), the American Cancer Society (24%), and WebMD (21%). Nearly one in 3 (31%) of participants felt the information from external sources influenced their decisions more than a small amount. There was no correlation between self-education and misperception of tumor response (coefficient -0.04 p = 0.6) or of treatment toxicity (coefficient 0.05, p = 0.6) relative to their treating physicians’ estimates. Conclusions: While many patients sought information from external sources, most felt they were not substantially influenced by this information. Almost all felt their oncologists provided them with adequate information. Information-seeking behavior was not associated with greater misperception regarding the treatment goals/expectations. Thus, despite a common concern about misinformation in external information sources, oncologists should support patients who seek such sources and discuss their findings.


Author(s):  
Raysh Thomas

Rapid advances in technological innovations, affordable high bandwidth networks, explosive growth of web resources,sophisticated search engines, ever growing digital resources and changing information seeking behavior of users are greatly transforming the future of academic libraries. The paper outlines the challenges which are very dominant and posing threat for the existence of academic libraries and suitable strategies requires to be made by the libraries and librarians to meet the expectations and information need of their existing and potential clienteles.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 146045822110247
Author(s):  
Hanife Rexhepi ◽  
Isto Huvila ◽  
Rose-Mharie Åhlfeldt ◽  
Åsa Cajander

Patients’ online access to their EHR together with the rapid proliferation of medical information on the Internet has changed how patients use information to learn about their health. Patients’ tendency to turn to the Internet to find information about their health and care is well-documented. However, little is known about patients’ information seeking behavior when using online EHRs. By using information horizons as an analytical tool this paper aims to investigate the information behavior of cancer patients who have chosen to view their EHRs (readers) and to those who have not made that option (non-readers). Thirty interviews were conducted with patients. Based on information horizons, it seems that non-reading is associated with living in a narrower information world in comparison to readers. The findings do not suggest that the smallness would be a result of active avoidance of information, or that it would be counterproductive for the patients. The findings suggest, however, that EHRs would benefit from comprehensive linking to authoritative health information sources to help users to understand their contents. In parallel, healthcare professionals should be more aware of their personal role as a key source of health information to those who choose not to read their EHRs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document