scholarly journals UBOM-4, a New Scale for Psychic Function and Energy: General Population Normative Values and Influencing Parameters

2018 ◽  
Vol 08 (04) ◽  
pp. 390-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisuke Gotoh ◽  
Hiroshi Hoshino ◽  
Kumi Yoshida ◽  
Yoshiko Akiyama ◽  
Satoshi Fujimoto ◽  
...  
Oral Diseases ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Oghli ◽  
Thomas List ◽  
Mike T. John ◽  
Birgitta Häggman‐Henrikson ◽  
Pernilla Larsson

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 2681-2689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Hinz ◽  
Joachim Weis ◽  
Elmar Brähler ◽  
Anja Mehnert

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghizlane Wariaghli ◽  
Fadoua Allali ◽  
Kenza Berrada ◽  
Zineb Idrissi ◽  
Ihsane Hmamouchi ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 1123-1129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciane N. Cruz ◽  
Carisi A. Polanczyk ◽  
Suzi A. Camey ◽  
Juliana F. Hoffmann ◽  
Marcelo P. Fleck

Assessment ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 107319111986091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bjarne Schmalbach ◽  
Markus Zenger ◽  
Ana Nanette Tibubos ◽  
Sören Kliem ◽  
Katja Petrowski ◽  
...  

The Hopkins Symptom Checklist–25 (HSCL-25) is a widely applied measure of depression and anxiety. The present study examines two of its short forms—the HSCL-5 and HSCL-10, which have been proposed by previous research—in a representative sample of the German general population. To this end, we conducted exploratory and confirmatory analysis on two subsamples ( n = 1,246 and n = 1,216). Our results suggest that, compared with the HSCL-25, both short forms represent economical ways of assessing depression and anxiety. Model fit was good and correlations with established measures demonstrate convergent validity. Both HSCL short forms are strongly invariant across sex, and we found evidence for partial strong invariance across age groups. Further analyses showed that differences in HSCL can be partially explained by sociodemographic variables. Finally, we report normative values for usage by researchers and clinicians. We recommend the HSCL-5 and HSCL-10 for clinical and research-oriented application.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 650-655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes M. Giesinger ◽  
Henrik Behrend ◽  
David F. Hamilton ◽  
Markus S. Kuster ◽  
Karlmeinrad Giesinger

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Aasheim ◽  
V. Finsen

We collected population-based normative data for the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand ) and QuickDASH questionnaires in order to determine the co-morbidity to be expected in a group of patients. We also studied the correlation between the two scores. A total of 2000 DASH forms and 800 QuickDASH forms were mailed to 1400 men and 1400 women. They were selected randomly in groups of 200 men and women in each age decade from 20–29 to over 80 years old. A total of 50% of the DASH forms and 56% of the QuickDASH forms were returned ( p < 0.005). The mean DASH scores for women rose with age from 5 among those aged 20–29, to 22 among those aged 70–79 and 36 for those over 80. The corresponding mean values for men were 5, 13 and 22. The mean DASH and QuickDASH scores extracted from the DASH forms were very similar in each age decade. Spearman’s correlation coefficient for the two forms was 0.965 for all 992 forms and 0.930 for the 174 forms with scores of 30 or more. There were, however, wide confidence limits for the agreement between scores in individual patients. The high average scores in the general population, particularly among the elderly, should be borne in mind when evaluating scores among patients. The QuickDASH should be preferred to the full DASH as it gives the same information, but is shorter and completed more often.


Author(s):  
John P. Bilezikian ◽  
Anna Maria Formenti ◽  
Robert A. Adler ◽  
Neil Binkley ◽  
Roger Bouillon ◽  
...  

AbstractThe 4th International Conference on Controversies in Vitamin D was held as a virtual meeting in September, 2020, gathering together leading international scientific and medical experts in vitamin D. Since vitamin D has a crucial role in skeletal and extra-skeletal systems, the aim of the Conference was to discuss improved management of vitamin D dosing, therapeutic levels and form or route of administration in the general population and in different clinical conditions. A tailored approach, based on the specific mechanisms underlying vitamin D deficiency in different diseases that were discussed, was recommended. Specifically, in comparison to healthy populations, higher levels of vitamin D and greater amounts of vitamin D were deemed necessary in osteoporosis, diabetes mellitus, obesity (particularly after bariatric surgery), and in those treated with glucocorticoids. Emerging and still open issues were related to target vitamin D levels and the role of vitamin D supplementation in COVID-19 since low vitamin D may predispose to SARS-CoV-2 infection and to worse COVID-19 outcomes. Finally, whereas oral daily cholecalciferol appears to be the preferred choice for vitamin D supplementation in the general population, and in most clinical conditions, active vitamin D analogs may be indicated in patients with hypoparathyroidism and severe kidney and liver insufficiency. Parenteral vitamin D administration could be helpful in malabsorption syndromes or in states of vitamin D resistance.Specific guidelines for desired levels of vitamin D should be tailored to the different conditions affecting vitamin D metabolism with the goal to define disease-specific normative values.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document