scholarly journals Aortic Valve Replacement in Bicuspid Aortic Valve with a Single Coronary Artery

2015 ◽  
Vol 05 (12) ◽  
pp. 131-134
Author(s):  
Masashi Kawabori
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Bicuspid Aortic Valve ◽  
Single Coronary Artery

scholarly journals Combined Aortic Valve Replacement and Coronary Bypass Grafting in Patient With Lipton’s R-III Type of Single Coronary Artery Anomaly

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milica Karadzic Kocica ◽  
Hristina Ugrinovic ◽  
Dejan Lazovic ◽  
Nemanja Karamarkovic ◽  
Milos Grujic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Coronary Bypass ◽  
Rare Condition ◽  
Single Coronary Artery ◽  
Bypass Grafting ◽  
Congenital Coronary Artery Anomalies

A single coronary artery is a very rare condition, commonly associated with other congenital anomalies. It could be generally classified as neither benign nor malignant form of congenital coronary artery anomalies since its pathophysiological and clinical implications grossly depend on different anatomical patterns defined by the site of origin and distribution of the branches. By presenting the patient with an isolated single coronary artery, who underwent successful combined aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, we intend to distinguish casual from causal in this extremely rare clinical and surgical scenario. This is the first-ever case published, combining such underlying pathology, clinical presentation, and surgical treatment.

scholarly journals Aortic valve replacement in a single coronary artery arising from the right Valsalva sinus

2013 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. e141-e141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Gallo ◽  
Alban Lika ◽  
Gino Gerosa ◽  
Andrea Colli
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Single Coronary Artery ◽  
The Right

scholarly journals Surgical treatment for accidentally discovered pseudoaneurysm of the mitral-aortic intervalvular fibrosa with bicuspid aortic valve, ascending aortic aneurysm, and myocardial ischemia: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kentaro Kiryu ◽  
Gembu Yamaura ◽  
Itaru Igarashi ◽  
Takayuki Kadohama ◽  
Fuminobu Tanaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Infective Endocarditis ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Bicuspid Aortic Valve ◽  
Heart Surgery ◽  
Open Heart Surgery ◽  
Ascending Aortic Aneurysm

Abstract Background Pseudoaneurysm of the mitral-aortic intervalvular fibrosa (P-MAIVF) is a rare complication of infective endocarditis and aortic valve replacement. Ruptured P-MAIVF and angina due to compression of the coronary arteries are severe complications of this condition. Case presentation We report a case of P-MAIVF that was diagnosed accidentally during a routine checkup. The patient was asymptomatic; however, she had a systolic murmur. She had a history of infective endocarditis, which was treated conservatively without open-heart surgery. In addition, she was diagnosed with aortic valve stenosis, aortic valve regurgitation, bicuspid aortic valve, right coronary artery stenosis, and an ascending aortic aneurysm. She was treated with surgery, which involved patch closure of P-MAIVF with aortic valve replacement, coronary artery bypass grafting, and ascending aorta replacement. After the operation, echocardiography showed no leakage from the P-MAIVF. Conclusions It is necessary to have knowledge of P-MAIVF. Following up cases of infective endocarditis and post-aortic valve replacement using echocardiography is important for both, diagnosing P-MAIVF and preventing serious complications such rupture and angina.

Early and Late Mortality of Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement After Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Circulation ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 92 (9) ◽  
pp. 163-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sayid F. Fighali ◽  
Amilcar Avendaño ◽  
MacArthur A. Elayda ◽  
Vei Vei Lee ◽  
Cesar Hernandez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Bypass Graft ◽  
Artery Bypass Graft ◽  
Late Mortality

Use and outcomes of emergency treatment strategies in patients with aortic valve stenosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S.M Piepenburg ◽  
K Kaier ◽  
C Olivier ◽  
M Zehender ◽  
C Bode ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Aortic Valve Stenosis ◽  
Emergency Treatment ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract Introduction and aim Current emergency treatment options for severe aortic valve stenosis include surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and balloon valvuloplasty (BV). So far no larger patient population has been evaluated regarding clinical characteristics and outcomes. Therefore we aimed to describe the use and outcome of the three therapy options in a broad registry study. Method and results Using German nationwide electronic health records, we evaluated emergency admissions of symptomatic patients with severe aortic valve stenosis between 2014 and 2017. Patients were grouped according to SAVR, TAVR or BV only treatments. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were stroke, acute kidney injury, periprocedural pacemaker implantation, delirium and prolonged mechanical ventilation >48 hours. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression analyses including baseline characteristics were performed to assess outcome risks. 8,651 patients with emergency admission for severe aortic valve stenosis were identified. The median age was 79 years and comorbidities included NYHA classes III-IV (52%), coronary artery disease (50%), atrial fibrillation (41%) and diabetes mellitus (33%). Overall in-hospital mortality was 6.2% during a mean length of stay of 22±15 days. TAVR was the most common treatment (6,357 [73.5%]), followed by SAVR (1,557 [18%]) and BV (737 8.5%]). Patients who were treated with TAVR or BV were significantly older than patients with SAVR (mean age 81.3±6.5 and 81.2±6.9 versus 67.2±11.0 years, p<0.001), had more relevant comorbidities (coronary artery disease 52–91% vs. 21.8%; p<0.001), worse NYHA classes III-IV (55–65% vs. 34.5%; p<0.001) and higher EuroSCORES (24.6±14.3 and 23.4±13.9 vs. 9.5±7.6; p<0.001) than SAVR patients. Patients treated with BV only had the highest in-hospital mortality compared with TAVR or SAVR (20.9% vs. 5.1 and 3.5%; p<0.001). Compared with BV only, SAVR patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14–0.46; p<0.001) and TAVR patients (aOR 0.37; 95% CI 0.28–0.50; p<0.001) had a lower risk for in-hospital mortality. Conclusion In-hospital mortality for emergency patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis is high. Our results showed that BV only therapy was associated with highest mortality, which is in line with current research. Yet, there is a trend towards more TAVR interventions and this study might imply that balloon valvuloplasty alone is insufficient. The role of BV as a bridging strategy to TAVR or SAVR needs to be further investigated. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Heart Center Freiburg University, Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document