Influence of the sequence of proximal optimisation technique and side branch dilation for the opening of jailed struts after coronary bifurcation stenting

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. e1812-e1813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshinobu Murasato ◽  
Takahiro Mori ◽  
Takayuki Okamura ◽  
Junya Shite
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. e425-e432
Author(s):  
Yoshinobu Murasato ◽  
Masaaki Nishihara ◽  
Takahiro Mori ◽  
Kyohei Meno ◽  
Kodai Shibao ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Peter Mortier ◽  
Matthieu De Beule ◽  
Denis Van Loo ◽  
Benedict Verhegghe ◽  
Pascal Verdonck

A common technique to improve the local blood flow through stenotic arteries involves the implantation of a metallic scaffold known as a stent. These devices have shown excellent results in unbranched vessels. However, the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions remains an enormous challenge and is generally associated with an increased complication rate. Many different techniques have been proposed in clinical literature, but all the suggested methodologies have specific limitations [1]. In many cases, a stent is deployed in the main branch (MB) and logically, this compromises the side branch (SB) patency. This is a frequently encountered situation that can be improved by balloon dilatation through the side of the MB stent (fig. 1). However, such balloon inflation may result in unwanted distortions of the stent [2].


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Cetinkal ◽  
K Kilickesmez ◽  
B Balaban Kocas ◽  
K Keskin ◽  
S S Yildiz ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Re-proximal optimizing technique (rePOT) (POT, side branch inflation and final POT) is a new provisional coronary bifurcation stenting technique which has better results in bench tests in comparison with kissing balloon inflation (KBI) techique. A clinical study showed that rePOT had beneficial effects in terms of strut malapposition, side branch obstruction and stent geometry. But it has not been compared with KBI technique especially in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI). Purpose The aim of our study is to compare the new rePOT technique with a known and widely used provisional stenting technique in a real-world special patient population in terms of clinical and technical aspects Methods 51 patients with STEMI who underwent p-PCI and needed provisional side branch stenting were enrolled in a tertiary center. Patients who needed “two stent strategy” at the beginning of procedure were deferred. Results Results were shown in Table 1. In-hospital death, contrast induced acute kidney injury, side branch dissection, need for side branch stenting and acute stent thrombosis were lower in rePOT group but there was no statistically significance. Table 1 rePOT group (n=23) KBI group (n=28) p value Age 51.6±11.7 51.2±9.4 0.87 Male gender 18 (78.3%) 24 (85.7%) 0.16 Diabetes Mellitus 3 (13%) 6 (21.4%) 0.43 Hypertension 5 (21.7%) 5 (17.9%) 0.73 Ejection fraction 46.8±10.6 44.8±8.4 0.43 Killip class>2 1 (4.3%) 4 (14.3%) 0.47 Stent type (DES) 21 (91.3%) 23 (82.1%) 0.34 Side branch dissection 3 (13%) 8 (28.6) 0.18 Side branch stenting 3 (13%) 6 (21.4%) 0.43 In-hospital death 2 (8.7%) 3 (10.7%) 0.81 CI-AKI 3 (13%) 6 (21.4%) 0.43 Acute stent thrombosis 0 2 (7.1%) 0.19 DES: Drug eluting stent; CI-AKI: contrast induced acute kidney injury. Conclusion To the best of our knowledge this is the first study which compares the new rePOT technique with KBI in patients with STEMI who underwent p-PCI and needed provisional coronary bifurcation stenting. Although results are similiar in terms of clinical and technical aspects, rePOT may be a useful and user-friendly technique in such a complex and emergent procedure. Acknowledgement/Funding None


2018 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 1293-1301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung Hwa Lee ◽  
Young Bin Song ◽  
Joo Myung Lee ◽  
Taek Kyu Park ◽  
Jeong Hoon Yang ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 150
Author(s):  
Helen Routledge ◽  

The favoured approach for coronary bifurcation disease is provisional stenting, which involves stenting the main vessel (MV) and ignoring the side branch unless clinical circumstances warrant placement of a second stent. This approach is based on a number of studies showing that provisional stenting is superior to conventional two-stent approaches. There is reason to suspect, however, that the conventional wisdom regarding provisional stenting does not accurately reflect the risks and benefits of a traditional two-stent approach. Analysis of studies (e.g. Nordic I; Coronary Bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents [CACTUS]; and the British Bifurcation Coronary Study: Old, New and Evolving Strategies [BBC ONE]) shows that provisional stenting frequently has similar long-term outcomes to a conventional two-stent approach in some patient populations. The long-term superiority of provisional stenting in coronary bifurcation disease depends on measuring a periprocedural or post-procedural rise in cardiac enzymes; removing this measure results in similar long-term outcomes between provisional and conventional two-stent approaches. New technologies or techniques will hopefully yield clear, unambiguous improvement in coronary bifurcation stenting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document