scholarly journals Endoscopic treatment modalities and outcomes in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-82
Author(s):  
Benjamin Cherng Hann Yip ◽  
Hossain Sayeed Sajjad ◽  
Jie-Xun Wang ◽  
Constantinos P Anastassiades
2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Hadzri Hasmoni ◽  
Azlida Che Aun ◽  
Khairul Azhar Jaafar ◽  
Tee Hoi Poh

Introduction: For patients with acute upper non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding (AUNVB), various guidelines and meta-analysis have shown that combination endoscopic treatment is superior to a single treatment modality (injection or thermal coagulation) as an endoscopic haemostatic technique. This study aim to assess the adherence to ‘best practice’ standards (an emphasis on endoscopic treatment modalities) for patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding with high risk stigmata on endoscopic findings. Methods: Between January 2015 and March 2016, consecutive charts of patients hospitalized for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan, Kuantan were reviewed. Data regarding initial presentation, endoscopic findings and management were collected. The inclusion criteria were patients with peptic ulcer disease and high risk stigmata on endoscopic findings. Results: Eighty one patients were included in the final analysis. There were 62 males and 19 females patients with mean age of 62.5 ± 1.5. Although the statistical analysis was not significant, more than half of the patients (60.5%) were given a single treatment modality to achieve haemostasis. Only 33.3% and 6.2% patients received a combination of two and three treatment modalities respectively. Conclusions: There was marked variability between the process of care and ‘best practice’ in AUNVB. Certain patient and situational characteristics may influence guideline adherence. Further studies are needed to delineate the underlying causes.


2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 1465
Author(s):  
Shu-Xin Tian ◽  
Wei-Gang Chen ◽  
Yong-Jun Li ◽  
Shi-Yao Chen ◽  
Kan-Xue Ruan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (SI-1) ◽  
pp. 11-16
Author(s):  
Talat AYYILDIZ ◽  
Mustafa DUYGULU

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common, life-threatening medical condition. Non-variceal causes account for more than 90% of bleeding episodes. Peptic ulcer disease is the most frequent cause of non-variceal UGIB. Patients present with hematemesis and/or melena but hematochezia might be present in patients with severe bleeding. Despite advances in diagnostic and therapeutic methods, mortality remains high in the elderly and patients with comorbidities. Endoscopy is the primary procedure that should be performed to identify the etiology of UGIB and for treatment purposes following adequate resuscitation of patients. Early endoscopy (within the first 24 hours) has considerably improved the clinical outcomes. A number of scoring systems are being used in patients with UGIB to identify the risk of complications, rebleeding risk, the need for interventional procedures and the risk of death. The most commonly used scoring tools are the Rockall score, Glasgow-Blatchford score and AIMS65 score. Primary treatment modalities include adequate resuscitation, intravenous fluid support, transfusion of red blood cell suspension, acid suppression therapy and administration of prokinetic agents. In general, angiography, computed tomography, technetium-99m-labeled red blood cell scintigraphy and capsule endoscopy may be used in patients whose bleeding cannot be detected endoscopically. Interventional radiological procedures should be initially performed for hemorrhages that cannot be stopped endoscopically and surgical options should be considered when interventional radiological procedures are out of reach or unsuccessful.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document