Proactive Human Factors Engineering Analysis in Space Station Design Using the Computer Manikin Jack

Author(s):  
Anders Sundin ◽  
Roland Örtengren ◽  
Hans Sjöberg
Author(s):  
D. B. Stambolian ◽  
B. A. Lawrence ◽  
K. S. Stelges ◽  
M. O. S. Ndiaye ◽  
L. C. Ridgwell ◽  
...  

1986 ◽  
Vol 30 (14) ◽  
pp. 1354-1357
Author(s):  
Raymond Carpenter ◽  
Michael W. Riley

The use of computers as a productivity improvement tool for “knowledgeworkers” is examined. Limitations of the human factors engineering analysis of work station design for the knowledgeworker are developed. Suggestions for future research directions are made.


1986 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 861-864
Author(s):  
William A. Breitmaier ◽  
Grace P. Waldrop ◽  
John Lazo

The U.S. Marine Corps has proposed sensor and display improvements to provide night attack capability for the AV-8B and F/A–18 aircraft. The aircraft enhancements include the addition of a Forward Looking Infrared sensor displayed on a new raster Head-Up Display, Night Vision Goggle compatibility, and a color multi-purpose display. A human factors engineering analysis was performed to identify the human factors impact of the cockpit changes involved. Included in the analysis were a literature review, interviews with pilots, design considerations review, and development of recommendations based on both human factors standards and lessons learned from similar projects. The primary areas researched were: cockpit lighting, color displays, and night vision sensor utilization.


Author(s):  
Dov Dori ◽  
Ahmad Jbara ◽  
Yongkai E. Yang ◽  
Andrew M. Liu ◽  
Charles M. Oman

Objective We define and demonstrate the use of OPM-TA—a model-based task analysis (TA) framework that uses object-process methodology (OPM) ISO 19450 as a viable alternative to traditional TA techniques. Background A variety of different TA methods exist in human factors engineering, and several of them are often applied successively for a broad task representation, making it difficult to follow. Method Using OPM-TA, we modeled how an International Space Station (ISS) astronaut would support extravehicular activities using the existing robotic arm workstation with a new control panel and an electronic procedure system. The modeling employed traditional TA methods and the new OPM-TA approach, enabling a comparison between them. Results While the initial stages of modeling with OPM-TA follow those of traditional TA, OPM-TA modeling yields an executable and logically verifiable model of the entire human–robot system. Both OPM’s hierarchical set of diagrams and the equivalent, automatically generated statements in a subset of natural language text specify how objects and processes relate to each other at increasingly detailed levels. The graphic and textual OPM modalities specify the system’s architecture, which enables its function and benefits its users. To verify the model logical correctness model, we executed it using OPM’s simulation capability. Conclusion OPM-TA was able to unify traditional TA methods and expand their capabilities. The formal yet intuitive OPM-TA approach fuses and extends traditional TA methods, which are not amenable to simulation. It therefore can potentially become a widely used means for TA and human–machine procedure development and testing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document