scholarly journals Understanding Resident Learning Preferences Within an Internal Medicine Noon Conference Lecture Series: A Qualitative Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam P. Sawatsky ◽  
Susan L. Zickmund ◽  
Kathryn Berlacher ◽  
Dan Lesky ◽  
Rosanne Granieri

Abstract Background The lecture remains the most common approach for didactic offerings in residency programs despite conflicting evidence about the effectiveness of this format. Objective The purpose of this study was to explore the perspectives of internal medicine residents toward conferences held in the lecture format. Methods The investigators invited internal medicine residents (N  =  144) to participate in focus groups discussing their perspectives about noon conference lectures. The investigators used a semistructured guide to ask about motivations for attendance and effectiveness of noon conferences, transcribed the recordings, coded the discussions, and analyzed the results. Results Seven focus groups with a total of 41 residents were held. This identified 4 major domains: (1) motivations for attendance; (2) appropriate content; (3) effective teaching methods; and (4) perspectives on active participation. Residents' motivations were categorized into external factors, including desire for a break and balance to their workload, and intrinsic attributes, including the learning opportunity, topic, and speaker. Appropriate content was described as clinically relevant, practical, and presenting a balance of evidence. Identified effective teaching methods included shorter teaching sessions focused on high-yield learning points structured around cases and questions. While active participation increases residents' perceived level of stress, the benefits of this format include increased attention and learning. Conclusions This study furthers our knowledge of the learning preferences of internal medicine residents within the changing environment of residency education and can be used in conjunction with principles of adult learning to reform how we deliver core medical knowledge.

2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 10 ◽  
pp. 15-21
Author(s):  
Vivek T Kulkarni ◽  
Sanjay M Salgado ◽  
Stephen R Pelletier ◽  
Helen M Shields

Author(s):  
Sangeeta Maruti Gawali

Background: There are various ways by which learning is made more effective and active participation and attendance of the students can be increased. Interactive lectures are one of the important tools to achieve this. The aim of the present study is evaluating the efficacy of interactive teaching. Methods: Interactive lecture series were arranged followed by didactic lectures. At the end of each lecture feedback was taken by giving anonymous questionnaire from each participant. Rating of response was analyzed by ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ format in percentage. Results: 80-85% students reported interactive lectures are interesting, effective and should be followed regularly. Conclusion: Present study concludes that interactive lecture is an effective teaching learning tool which facilitates learners to think, feel and do.


2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 310-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina MacNamara ◽  
April Wilhelm ◽  
Geolani Dy ◽  
Sarah Andiman ◽  
Carol Landau ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Residents report they lack preparation for caring for an increasingly diverse US population. In response, a variety of curricula have been developed to integrate cultural competency into medical training programs. To date, none of these curricula has specifically addressed members of recently resettled populations. Methods A preliminary assessment was conducted among internal medicine (IM) residents at 1 program (N  =  147). Based on 2 conceptual frameworks and the survey results, a pilot curriculum was developed and integrated into the interns' ambulatory block education within the general IM track (n  =  9). It included (1) online information made available to all hospital staff; (2) 4 interactive didactic sessions; and (3) increased exposure to newly arrived patients. The curriculum was qualitatively evaluated through 2 focus groups. Results The preliminary assessment was completed by 101 of 147 residents (69%), with 61% of respondents indicating they felt that they received less than adequate education in this area. Eight of the 9 interns exposed to the new curriculum participated in the focus groups. Overall, respondents reported they thought patient care had improved for recently resettled populations and across their patient panels after exposure to the curriculum. Conclusions This study demonstrated that an intervention that included didactics and enhanced exposure to a diverse population improved IM interns' perceptions of care for all patients, including recently settled individuals.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen E. Hauer ◽  
Daniel Jurich ◽  
Jonathan Vandergrift ◽  
Rebecca S. Lipner ◽  
Furman S. McDonald ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Cassandra Nicotra ◽  
Martin Barnes ◽  
Phyllis Macchio ◽  
Greg Haggerty ◽  
Carolina De Elia ◽  
...  

Background: The Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) currently requires Internal Medicine (IM) GME programs to incorporate educational opportunities for training and structured experiences in Palliative and Hospice Medicine. Miscomprehension of the differences between palliative medicine and hospice care is a barrier for IM residents ordering palliative consults as many residents may underutilize palliative medicine if a patient is not appropriate for hospice. Objective: This educational performance improvement (PI) project assessed 3 domains, including Medical Knowledge (MK) of palliative versus hospice medicine at baseline and following a single didactic session. Additionally, the number of palliative consults ordered was used as a surrogate for interpersonal and communication skills (ICS) and patient care (PC) domains. Methods: An 8-question survey and 30-minute didactic session were created based upon experientially-determined issues most confusing to IM residents. Participants included 33 IM residents (PGY-1s-3 s) from July 2018 (first cohort) and 32 (PGY-1 s and any PGY-2s-3 s who did not participate in the first cohort) from July 2019 (second cohort). Results: 65 of a possible 73 residents participated (89% response rate) Pre-test Questions 5, 6, and 8 correct responses were <50% in both cohorts with average scores, respectively, of 43.1%, 35.4%, and 40%. Residents improved on the post-test for Q5, 6, 8 to, respectively, 80%, 86.7%, and 48.3% (t = 7.68, df = 59, p < 001). Correct Q1 responses declined in the first cohort, but clarification for the second cohort improved from pre-test (36.4%) to post-test (65.5%). The total number of palliative consults placed by IM residents increased as well. Conclusions: Baseline MK of palliative versus hospice medicine was <50% on 4/8 questions. A brief educational session significantly improved residents’ short-term comprehension and increased the number of palliative consults.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document