scholarly journals Post-conflict development in Liberia: Governance, security, capacity building and a developmental approach

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
EB Gariba
Keyword(s):  
Capacity Building ◽  
Developmental Approach ◽  
Post Conflict

scholarly journals A Prologue to Development: Establishing the legitimacy of the rule of law in post-conflict Solomon Islands

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Finbar Benedict Kiddle
Keyword(s):  
Capacity Building ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Solomon Islands ◽  
Initial Response ◽  
The State ◽  
Western World ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Shared Beliefs ◽  
Post Conflict ◽  
The Individual

<p>The rule of law forms the bedrock for societal and institutional organisation in the Western world. International actors see its establishment in developing countries as a means to facilitate wider development work and an end in and of itself. However, development of the legitimacy of the rule of law is not well understood, especially in post-conflict environments where it is most lacking. Despite the best efforts of international interventions, the rule of law is often not in the paramount position it requires: it lacks legitimacy amongst the people. To understand why this is the case there is a need for a better understanding of how interventions develop legitimacy in the rule of law. This research develops that understanding and asks the question ‘how does the contemporary peacebuilding agenda develop the legitimacy of the rule of law in post-conflict states?’ To do this the research undertakes a case study investigation of a particular intervention: the Regional Assistance Mission to Solomon Islands. Discourse and content analyses, carried out on interview transcripts and a wealth of documentation, reveal the different forces exerted by the intervention to develop legitimacy in the rule of law. These are interpreted through a particular lens: a modified version of Luke’s three faces of power that also draws on concepts of governmentality. A four-dimensional definition of legitimacy also allows for greater analytical depth. The research shows that the contemporary peacebuilding agenda can do some things very well. It is especially effective at the initial response to crisis. It is after the establishment of this basic security/performance dimension of the rule of law that interventions begin to develop their institutional/process dimension through capacity building. Capacity building divides into three levels: the individual, the organisation, and the state. It integrates the rule of law across the state edifice and establishes it as a foundational element of the system. However, the most important aspect of building legitimacy is the development of shared beliefs, as it is these that establish what is ‘true’ amongst a society. Contemporary peacebuilding interventions portray the rule of law as intrinsically legitimate and the correct, rational way of organising society. This idea permeates through their structures, discourses, and methods. However, the rule of law is not intrinsically legitimate. It is a culturally constructed concept that in many countries is in opposition with alternative ways of organising society and resolving conflict. Developing legitimacy in the rule of law is then a struggle between competing organisational systems. Such conflict jeopardises gains made by interventions, as the rule of law is fighting an uphill battle against other internalised, and often more locally reverent, norms. If it is to establish in post-conflict environments, the rule of law and competing systems need to interact to produce a locally relevant, hybrid, conception of the rule of law. One that is recognisable to all sides, but unique to the context. This leads to peace.</p>

scholarly journals The politics of knowledge: ethnicity, capacity and return in post-conflict reconstruction policy

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 1493-1514 ◽  
Author(s):  
CAROLINE HUGHES
Keyword(s):  
Capacity Building ◽  
Local Participation ◽  
International Agencies ◽  
Politics Of Knowledge ◽  
Post Conflict ◽  
Timor Leste ◽  
Significant Burden ◽  
Ethnic Solidarity

AbstractA new casting of diasporas, exiles and returnees as potentially transformative agents in post-conflict polities is the topic of this article. ‘Return of Qualified Expatriates’ programmes have recently been launched by international agencies in a number of post-conflict countries in an attempt to promote better capacity-building within post-conflict states institutions. This article argues that the ostensible technical orientation of these programmes is misleading, and they have a political significance which is noted and contested locally. In political terms, they represent attempts to smuggle Western hierarchies of knowledge into post-conflict reconstruction efforts under the cover of ethnic solidarity, to the detriment of local participation and empowerment. The article argues further that this is always contested by interested parties locally, often by mobilising alternative capacities, labelled ‘authentic’, in opposition. As such, strategies that attempt to use ethnic ties to overcome this local contestation are placing a significant burden on ethnic categories that are slippery, malleable and contested in post-conflict contexts. These points are demonstrated with reference to the cases of Cambodia and Timor-Leste.

scholarly journals Strategic consulting and capacity building in US humanitarian policy

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-312
Author(s):  
Anna A. Velikaya ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Capacity Building ◽  
Public Diplomacy ◽  
Swot Analysis ◽  
Humanitarian Assistance ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
Post Conflict ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
The Us ◽  
The Cold War ◽  
Economic Stabilization

Strategic advising and capacity building are closely interconnected, as they involve the deployment to foreign countries of American advisers who will act by strengthening democratization, attracting military and police contingents, civil administrators, providing humanitarian assistance, economic stabilization and infrastructure development. All of these instruments are aimed at strengthening American influence everywhere and are used by Washington through the activities of American advisers dealing working in developing and post-conflict countries. The practice of the U.S. strategic advising and capacity building exists since the 1940s, during the Cold war it was aimed at confrontation with the socialist system. The role of advisers in advancing interests is enormous and ubiquitous: from Ukraine to Syria, from Somalia to Haiti. It is closely related to other instruments of American humanitarian policy: public diplomacy, educational exchanges, development assistance. The transplant of US civil society concepts to foreign countries is doubtful, but meets American goals. The author evaluates US system of strategic advising and capacity building analysing activities of federal ministries and agencies. The hypothesis of the article that Washington would use these instrumwnts more broadly, and theyvwould be oriented more explicitly towards national defence interests. The article includes SWOT analysis of the US system of strategic advising and capacity building.

scholarly journals A Prologue to Development: Establishing the legitimacy of the rule of law in post-conflict Solomon Islands

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Finbar Benedict Kiddle
Keyword(s):  
Capacity Building ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Solomon Islands ◽  
Initial Response ◽  
The State ◽  
Western World ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Shared Beliefs ◽  
Post Conflict ◽  
The Individual

<p>The rule of law forms the bedrock for societal and institutional organisation in the Western world. International actors see its establishment in developing countries as a means to facilitate wider development work and an end in and of itself. However, development of the legitimacy of the rule of law is not well understood, especially in post-conflict environments where it is most lacking. Despite the best efforts of international interventions, the rule of law is often not in the paramount position it requires: it lacks legitimacy amongst the people. To understand why this is the case there is a need for a better understanding of how interventions develop legitimacy in the rule of law. This research develops that understanding and asks the question ‘how does the contemporary peacebuilding agenda develop the legitimacy of the rule of law in post-conflict states?’ To do this the research undertakes a case study investigation of a particular intervention: the Regional Assistance Mission to Solomon Islands. Discourse and content analyses, carried out on interview transcripts and a wealth of documentation, reveal the different forces exerted by the intervention to develop legitimacy in the rule of law. These are interpreted through a particular lens: a modified version of Luke’s three faces of power that also draws on concepts of governmentality. A four-dimensional definition of legitimacy also allows for greater analytical depth. The research shows that the contemporary peacebuilding agenda can do some things very well. It is especially effective at the initial response to crisis. It is after the establishment of this basic security/performance dimension of the rule of law that interventions begin to develop their institutional/process dimension through capacity building. Capacity building divides into three levels: the individual, the organisation, and the state. It integrates the rule of law across the state edifice and establishes it as a foundational element of the system. However, the most important aspect of building legitimacy is the development of shared beliefs, as it is these that establish what is ‘true’ amongst a society. Contemporary peacebuilding interventions portray the rule of law as intrinsically legitimate and the correct, rational way of organising society. This idea permeates through their structures, discourses, and methods. However, the rule of law is not intrinsically legitimate. It is a culturally constructed concept that in many countries is in opposition with alternative ways of organising society and resolving conflict. Developing legitimacy in the rule of law is then a struggle between competing organisational systems. Such conflict jeopardises gains made by interventions, as the rule of law is fighting an uphill battle against other internalised, and often more locally reverent, norms. If it is to establish in post-conflict environments, the rule of law and competing systems need to interact to produce a locally relevant, hybrid, conception of the rule of law. One that is recognisable to all sides, but unique to the context. This leads to peace.</p>

IMF Engagement with Countries in Post-Conflict and Fragile Situations - Stocktaking

Policy Papers ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (37) ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Capacity Building ◽  
Program Design ◽  
Policy Support ◽  
Fragile States ◽  
Guidance Note ◽  
Post Conflict

This review examines experience in implementing the lessons drawn in the 2011 Board paper on the Fund’s engagement with countries in post-conflict and fragile situations (more commonly referred to as fragile states (FS)) and the ensuing 2012 Guidance Note. The focus is on capacity building, Fund facilities and program design, and policy support. The review identifies scope to improve the Fund’s engagement in selected areas.

Chapter Five: Aid and Fiscal Capacity Building in Post-Conflict Countries

2010 ◽  
Vol 50 (412-413) ◽  
pp. 101-120
Author(s):  
James K. Boyce
Keyword(s):  
Capacity Building ◽  
Fiscal Capacity ◽  
Post Conflict

International Aid, Relief, and Humanitarian Assistance

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Monico ◽  
Karen Smith Rotabi ◽  
Taghreed Abu Sarhan
Keyword(s):  
Social Work ◽  
Capacity Building ◽  
International Development ◽  
Forced Migration ◽  
Humanitarian Aid ◽  
Social Work Practice ◽  
Humanitarian Assistance ◽  
International Social Work ◽  
Post Conflict ◽  
International Social

International development, humanitarian aid, and relief are at the heart of international social work practice. They have evolved historically and globally; shaped by world markets, social and environmental forces, including natural disasters. Considering this context, the authors cluster relevant social-work theories and practices as (a) human rights perspectives, and (b) ecological, feminist, and cultural theories. They discuss both micro and macro practice, with an emphasis on the latter. Case studies are presented with the overlay of relevant international conventions, guidance, and international private law. A continuum of humanitarian assistance is presented considering different countries. Guatemala is a prominent example in addition to Haiti’s massive earthquake of 2010 with recent revelations of sexual abuse and exploitation by humanitarian aid workers, post-conflict community-based practices in Afghanistan, and the largest cross-border forced migration in modern history of Iraqi, and Syrian refugees with this second group being of particular concern given their mass displacement. Capacity building as related to social work training is emphasized. This entry concludes that much remains to be accomplished with regard to capacity building among humanitarian assistance organizations so that the principles and practice strategies of international social work are institutionalized.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document