SOME EXAMPLES OF TARGETS IN THE CURRICULUM Input Targets The school meets statutory requirements in the delivery and assessment of the curriculum: (Quotes from Ofsted, 1995, are from the Guidance on Inspection — page numbers are quoted from the version for secondary schools but are also in the versions for primary and special schools) • The curriculum meets statutory requirements to teach the subjects of the National Curriculum, religious education and sex education, where these apply (p. 78). • The governing body is monitoring pupil progress. • The curriculum displays breadth — all pupils come into contact with all areas of learning. • The curriculum displays balance — each area of learning is given appropriate attention. • The curriculum is relevant to the needs of all pupils. • The curriculum displays different kinds of provision for each pupil. • The curriculum displays progression for all pupils. • The curriculum displays continuity for all pupils. • The curriculum promotes pupils’ intellectual, physical and personal development and prepares pupils for the next stage of education, training or employment (ibid). • The curriculum provides equality of access and opportunity for pupils to learn and to make progress (ibid). • The curriculum meets the requirements of all pupils on the school’s Code of Practice special educational needs register (ibid). • The curriculum is planned effectively (ibid). • The curriculum is enriched by extra-curricular provision, including sport (ibid). • The curriculum includes, for pupils of secondary age, careers education and impartial guidance, drawing on the careers service (ibid). • There are effective systems for assessing pupils’ attainment (ibid). • Assessment information is used to inform curriculum planning (ibid).

2002 ◽  
pp. 62-62
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Schools ◽  
Religious Education ◽  
Sex Education ◽  
Personal Development ◽  
National Curriculum ◽  
Educational Needs ◽  
Curriculum Planning ◽  
Special Educational Needs ◽  
Special Schools ◽  
Code Of Practice

„Społeczeństwo dla wszystkich”, czy tylko „szkoła dla wszystkich” – opinie nauczycieli szkoły specjalnej, integracyjnej i ogólnodostępnej

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (3 (253)) ◽  
pp. 119-138
Author(s):  
Monika Skura
Keyword(s):  
Inclusive Education ◽  
Personal Development ◽  
Severe Disabilities ◽  
Educational Needs ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
Special School ◽  
Special Educational Needs ◽  
Special Schools ◽  
Unrealistic Expectation ◽  
Inclusive Society

Teachers play a vital role in students’ intellectual and personal development, hence they help to prepare citizens. Therefore, it is worth asking what their views are on a “perfectly inclusive” world vision. To analyse the teachers’ perception, the study explored two areas: their outlook on an inclusive society and the importance of an inclusive education for marginalised groups. The research comprised teachers working with Special Educational Needs (SEN) students: 55 from integration schools, 48 from regular schools, 45 from special schools (those with intellectual disability (ID) and autism). The data was collected using a questionnaire. The findings highlighted that all groups thought that people with disabilities primarily needed help and support, special school teachers felt most strongly about this. Special educational needs teachers most strongly disagreed that their group were afraid of the disabled or felt hostility towards them compared to the other two groups. All groups had milder opinions regarding other types of marginalised people. The majority of special school teacher’s had views similar to general society regarding that the presence of refugees in society could pose a danger, whilst most teachers from regular schools thought that refugees were here for work and social care. In light of the study, all groups agreed that regular schools were not the best place for pupils with SEN, however they would make an exception for students with mild disabilities, the children of refugees, and those from national and ethnic minorities. Special schools teachers working with students with severe disabilities strongly agreed that students with an ID and autism generally, should stay in the separated model of education. All groups regarded that the goal of an “education for all” was an unrealistic expectation especially in the near future, just as the goal of an “inclusive society”.

scholarly journals Educational outcomes of children in Wales with cerebral palsy

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hywel Jones ◽  
Bethan Carter ◽  
Jackie Bethel ◽  
Verity Bennett ◽  
Sarah Rees ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Cerebral Palsy ◽  
School Attendance ◽  
National Curriculum ◽  
Area Deprivation ◽  
Special Educational Needs ◽  
Special Schools ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Education Data ◽  
Teacher Assessments

Background with rationaleIt is recognized that children with disability have special educational needs (SEN). They are likely to have poor school attendance and do not achieve well academically. Many children with a cerebral palsy (CP) have SEN but little is known about their educational provision or outcomes. Main AimTo investigate the educational experience of children in Wales with CP and describe the type of SEN and SEN provision; school attendance; achievement—teacher assessments at the end of the Foundation Phase and Key Stages 2 and 3 of the National Curriculum (NC)—and in General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) examinations. Methods/ApproachData from the Pupil Level Annual School Census (PLASC), NC and GCSE results from 2009 to 2016 were linked with routine e-health records of primary and secondary health care data held in SAIL. The health care records were used to identify pupils who, potentially, had a cerebral palsy. ResultsThe linked data set included around 360,000 pupils per school census of whom 1200–1400 per school census were identified as having a CP, representing a crude prevalence of 0.4%. Adjusted for age, year and sex, there was no significant variation in prevalence by area deprivation. Around 60% of children with a CP have a statement of SEN; over a quarter of CP children are educated in special schools; CP children in mainstream (primary, middle and secondary) schools tended to miss more school sessions (~50% more) than other children and lower percentages achieved the expected levels at Key Stages 2 and 3 and the Level 2 GCSE threshold. Conclusion/Implications This work demonstrates the utility of record-linkage between health and education data to map, monitor and provide information to parents, carers and policymakers about education outcomes for this group of children to inform planning and service provision.

scholarly journals Barriers to implementing inclusive education for children with special educational needs: Parents’ perceptions

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 50-66
Author(s):  
Andrey Valeryevich Mironov ◽  
◽  
Evgeniya Sergeevna Shelest ◽  
Olga Vladimirovna Bulatova ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Learning Environment ◽  
Inclusive Education ◽  
Educational Needs ◽  
International Studies ◽  
Special Educational Needs ◽  
Special Schools ◽  
Barriers To Education ◽  
Inclusive Learning ◽  
Inclusive Schools ◽  
Technological Barriers

Introduction. The authors investigate the problem of creating an inclusive educational environment for children with special educational needs (SEN) through interaction with their parents. The aim of this article is to identify obstacles faced by parents of children with SEN within an inclusive learning environment. Materials and Methods. The article reviews and analyses Russian and international studies into implementing inclusive education. The empirical data were collected via questionnaires and processed using the methods of mathematical statistics. Results. The authors identified the following barriers to implementing inclusive education for children with SEN, perceived by parents: information, socio-psychological, organizational, methodological, financial and technological. The comparative analysis showed that the barriers to education of children with SEN are faced both by parents whose children attend inclusive schools, and by parents whose children attend special schools, which create special learning environment, taking into account mental and physical development of children with SEN. Parents identified barriers to education for children with SEN regardless of types of schools and mode of study. Parents of children attending inclusive schools raised concerns about organizational, methodological, financial and technological barriers. Parents whose children attend special schools emphasized social and psychological barriers. Conclusions. In conclusion, the authors summarize parents’ perceptions of the main barriers to implementing inclusive education for children with SEN.

Necesidades Educativas Especiales y Educación Física: un análisis desde la propuesta curricular ministerial de Chile (Special Educational Needs and Physical Education: an analysis from the Chilean ministerial curricular proposal)

Retos ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 56-65
Author(s):  
Franklin Castillo-Retamal ◽  
Bastián Cárcamo Garrido ◽  
Héctor Aravena Calderón ◽  
Alfonso Valenzuela Zakuda ◽  
Tomás Pérez Farías ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Education ◽  
National Curriculum ◽  
Educational Needs ◽  
Special Educational Needs ◽  
Education And Health ◽  
Documentary Analysis ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
General Work

  El artículo tiene como objetivo analizar las Bases Curriculares (BC) de la asignatura de Educación Física y Salud (EFS) en relación con la atención de estudiantes con Necesidades Educativas Especiales (NEE). Se utilizó una metodología cualitativa de tipo descriptiva que tiene como procedimiento el análisis bibliográfico y documental. Los resultados indican que las BC no están diseñadas en lo específico para trabajar con estudiantes con NEE puesto que no existen orientaciones puntuales para ello, sino que el enfoque está en el trabajo general con estudiantes que no tienen dificultad para conseguir los objetivos y habilidades establecidas por el currículo nacional chileno. Se concluye que las BC están orientadas a la homogeneidad del alumnado y presenta poca o nula utilidad en el abordaje de la EFS propiamente tal en este grupo. Abstract. The article aims to analyze the Curricular Bases (BC) of the Physical Education and Health (EFS) subject in relation to the attention of students with Special Educational Needs (SEN). A qualitative descriptive methodology was used that has as a procedure the bibliographic and documentary analysis. The results indicate that the BC are not specifically designed to work with students with SEN since there are no specific guidelines for it, but rather that the focus is on general work with students who do not have difficulty in achieving the objectives and skills established by the national curriculum. It is concluded that the BC are oriented to the homogeneity of the students and that their usefulness does not contribute to the approach of the SAI itself in this group.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document