Connections, Collisions, and Complementarity: The Dynamic of Health Care Chaplain, Parish Nurse, and Parish Clergy Collaboration

2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorothy Mayernik ◽  
Lenore K. Resick ◽  
Monica L. Skomo ◽  
Kate Mandock

1976 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger A. Bell ◽  
Robert R. Morris ◽  
Charles E. Holzer ◽  
George J. Warheit

Parts I and II of this article contain some of the results of a recent research project conducted in an area of mid-Florida. The group surveyed was predominantly parish clergy. This article gives some indication of the results of this survey as it speaks to the issue of the clergy as a mental health resource. There is a good deal of serendipity data that spin off from the central theme. The article has immediate relevance for clinical pastoral education supervisors, parish clergy, and others in the field of health care delivery.


1997 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 368-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darlene Weis ◽  
Rosemarie Matheus ◽  
Mary Jane Schank

1999 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-203
Author(s):  
Kendra Carlson

The Supreme Court of California held, in Delaney v. Baker, 82 Cal. Rptr. 2d 610 (1999), that the heightened remedies available under the Elder Abuse Act (Act), Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 15657,15657.2 (West 1998), apply to health care providers who engage in reckless neglect of an elder adult. The court interpreted two sections of the Act: (1) section 15657, which provides for enhanced remedies for reckless neglect; and (2) section 15657.2, which limits recovery for actions based on “professional negligence.” The court held that reckless neglect is distinct from professional negligence and therefore the restrictions on remedies against health care providers for professional negligence are inapplicable.Kay Delaney sued Meadowood, a skilled nursing facility (SNF), after a resident, her mother, died. Evidence at trial indicated that Rose Wallien, the decedent, was left lying in her own urine and feces for extended periods of time and had stage I11 and IV pressure sores on her ankles, feet, and buttocks at the time of her death.


1996 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-275
Author(s):  
O. Lawrence ◽  
J.D. Gostin

In the summer of 1979, a group of experts on law, medicine, and ethics assembled in Siracusa, Sicily, under the auspices of the International Commission of Jurists and the International Institute of Higher Studies in Criminal Science, to draft guidelines on the rights of persons with mental illness. Sitting across the table from me was a quiet, proud man of distinctive intelligence, William J. Curran, Frances Glessner Lee Professor of Legal Medicine at Harvard University. Professor Curran was one of the principal drafters of those guidelines. Many years later in 1991, after several subsequent re-drafts by United Nations (U.N.) Rapporteur Erica-Irene Daes, the text was adopted by the U.N. General Assembly as the Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and for the Improvement of Mental Health Care. This was the kind of remarkable achievement in the field of law and medicine that Professor Curran repeated throughout his distinguished career.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document