Econometrica ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 839-874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo E. Honore ◽  
Ekaterini Kyriazidou

2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 310-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Li ◽  
Miguel I. Gómez ◽  
Bradley J. Rickard ◽  
Margaret Skinner

We collected surveys from 94 greenhouse and nursery growers in three northeastern states to examine factors influencing integrated pest management (IPM] adoption. We constructed three alternative dependent variables describing the extent of IPM adoption and employed discrete choice models to identify factors that affect adoption. We find that operations with more full-time workers are more likely to adopt IPM. Additionally, greenhouse/nursery growers that rank pests as a serious problem are likely to use a wider array of IPM practices. The reliability of IPM practices is critical for adoption. Our analysis highlights differences between self-reported and objective IPM adoption measures.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-37
Author(s):  
Bharat P. Bhatta

This paper analyzes and synthesizes the fundamentals of discrete choice models. This paper alsodiscusses the basic concept and theory underlying the econometrics of discrete choice, specific choicemodels, estimation method, model building and tests, and applications of discrete choice models. Thiswork highlights the relationship between economic theory and discrete choice models: how economictheory contributes to choice modeling and vice versa. Keywords: Discrete choice models; Random utility maximization; Decision makers; Utility function;Model formulation


Author(s):  
Benjamin J. Gillen ◽  
Sergio Montero ◽  
Hyungsik Roger Moon ◽  
Matthew Shum

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document