Instrumental delivery

2020 ◽  
pp. 40-47
Author(s):  
Sheila Broderick ◽  
Ruth Cochrane
2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 102108
Author(s):  
Didier Riethmuller ◽  
Marine Schaeffer ◽  
Pierre-Louis Forey ◽  
Marie Chevallier ◽  
Corentin Berthet ◽  
...  

The Lancet ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 358 (9294) ◽  
pp. 1725
Author(s):  
Wiebke Gogarten ◽  
Hugo Van Aken ◽  
Elke Baez ◽  
Hartmut Buerkle

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (01) ◽  
pp. 11-17
Author(s):  
FOUZIA YASMEEN ◽  
NABEELA SHAMI ◽  
WASEEM TALIB

Objectives: To compare obstetric outcomes in the pregnancy subsequent to still birth with that following live birth in first pregnancy. Data Source: Medline data base. Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Ghurki Trust Teaching Hospital Lahore. Materials & Methods: The study included women who delivered a stillbirth between 2005 - 2007(exposed cohort). A group of women with live birth (unexposed cohort) was matched for delivery within the same year, maternal age (+/- 3 years), parity (+/- 1). In 2009, the charts of these women were examined for subsequent pregnancies. Main outcome measures Maternal and neonatal outcomes in the second pregnancy, pre eclampsia, placental abruption, labour induction, instrumental delivery, caesarean delivery, malpresentation, prematurity, low birthweight and stillbirth. Results: The exposed cohort group B (n =50) was at increased risk of preeclampsia (44% versus 28%, p value = 0.001<0.05) and placental abruption (20% versus 2%) and malpresentation (18% versus 4%). labour induction (20% versus 8%) instrumental delivery (16%versus 8%) and emergency caesarean (40%versus 16%); and prematurity (62%versus 26%, p value = 0.001<0.05), low birthweight (86% versus 54%, p value = 0.000<0.05) and stillbirths (6% versus 2%, p value = 0.489>0.05) of the infant as compared with the unexposed cohort group A (n =50). Conclusions: Majority of women with a previous stillbirth have a live birth in the subsequent pregnancy, they are a highrisk group with an increased incidence of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alemwork Desta Meshesha ◽  
Muluken Azage ◽  
Endalkachew Worku ◽  
Getahun Gebre Bogale

Abstract Background Globally, every year, 2.5 million infants die within their first month of life. Neonatal asphyxia is the leading specific cause of neonatal mortality in low- and middle-income countries, including Ethiopia. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify the determinants of birth asphyxia among newborns admitted in Amhara region referral hospitals, Ethiopia. Methods Facility-based unmatched case-control study was employed among 193 cases and 193 controls of newborns. Newborns admitted to neonatal intensive care units with admission criteria of birth asphyxia and without birth asphyxia were considered as cases (Apgar score<7) and controls (Apgar score>=7) respectively. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire by systematic random sampling technique with proportional allocation, and entered in to Epi-Info version 7 and exported to SPSS version 20 for statistical analysis. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to identify determinants of birth asphyxia. Results Newborns with low birth weight (<2.5kg) had 8.94 higher odds of birth asphyxia than those whose weight at birth was >=2.5kg at birth (AOR: 8.94, 95% CI: 4.08, 19.56). Newborns born at health centers were 7.36 times more likely to develop birth asphyxia than those born at hospitals (AOR: 7.36, 95% CI: 2.44, 22.13). Newborns born using instrumental delivery were 3.03 times more likely to develop birth asphyxia than those delivered by vaginally (AOR: 3.03, 95% CI: 1.41, 6.49). Newborns from mothers with prolonged labor were 2 times more likely to suffer from birth asphyxia as compared to their counterparts (AOR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.20, 3.36). Conclusion This study identified prolonged labor, instrumental delivery, delivered at health centers, and low birth weight were identified as determinants of birth asphyxia. Thus, intervention planning towards the identified determinants may be needed to reduce neonatal birth asphyxia.


2000 ◽  
Vol 70 ◽  
pp. C61-C61
Author(s):  
H.C.J. Scheeners ◽  
M.C.J. Thans ◽  
P.A. de Jong ◽  
G.G.M. Essed ◽  
S. Le Cessie ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 424-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Raj ◽  
J. Foy

A 24-year-old presented in labour requesting an epidural. She had been diagnosed as having “pelvic arthropathy” at 37 weeks. After an uneventful epidural and instrumental delivery, she discharged herself home. She re-presented 19 days later with left hip pain and abnormal neurological signs in the lower limbs. On MRI, there was a large paraspinal abscess with an epidural granulation mass compressing her spinal cord. She had an urgent surgical decompression. In hindsight, it is likely that the paraspinal mass was present at the time of epidural insertion. The discussion highlights that complications are sometimes not what they seem.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document