Using Fiscal Impact Models in Local Infrastructure Investment Decisions*

2021 ◽  
pp. 99-107
Author(s):  
John M. Halstead ◽  
Thomas G. Johnson
2019 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
PHIL Simmons ◽  
BRIAN DOLLERY

Shortfalls in infrastructure expenditure represent a ubiquitous problem in all Australian local government systems as well as in many other countries. In this paper, we use an evolutionary model to describe how local government investment decisions are made. We demonstrate that fear of reputational damage among elected councilors could cause herding behavior resulting in convergent and overly cautious investment behavior by councils. Under these conditions, divergent viewpoints amongst council members are discouraged and local government may become moribund in its decision-making. We show how this may result in “gaps” in infrastructure investment.


2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lewis Evans

Many volatile factors influence the performance of infrastructure and these yield a range of uncertainties when forward-looking investment decisions are being considered. This article is restricted to consideration of physical infrastructure, which has a wide spectrum of such factors. It includes physical events such as earthquakes that are beyond the influence of humankind, other events for each of which there is a very small probability of occurrence, and events that will almost certainly occur at some point within any reasonable period of time. It also includes economic events relating to uncommon financial episodes and common, but uncertain, volatility in demand and cost. Rare physical events have implications for investment in infrastructure that provides some mitigation of the effects of these events. In so doing, there is a trade-off between providing in advance for remotely likely but substantial events in specific, and usually costly, redundancy infrastructure, and having an economy with the resources to deal ex post with natural disasters. Obviously, some intermediate position will be socially desirable. 


Subject Outlook for sovereign wealth funds. Significance The world's largest sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) manage more than 3 trillion dollars in assets, but budgetary pressure from lower oil prices is causing Saudi Arabia and others to dip into the funds. Even with some outflows, SWFs remain large strategic investors, and their investment decisions have important effects. China is investing in infrastructure in its neighbouring countries and expects the SWFs to cooperate with the Silk Road Fund (SRF), a new state-backed private equity fund. Impacts If oil-producing countries' SWFs sell assets massively, there may be disruptions in the affected markets. The largest SWFs' growing focus on risk management leaves them better positioned to manage funding challenges and withdrawal risk. Strategic asset allocation will be further directed to meet the strong demand for infrastructure investment in emerging markets. Banks that have brokered deals for SWFs will need to find new customers to compensate for the reduced business. A search for yield may reverse the trend of a falling share of SWFs assets being managed externally, benefiting asset management firms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document