The Wisdom of the Scribe and the Fear of the Lord in the Life of St Columba

Author(s):  
Jennifer O’Reilly
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
pp. 095394682110097
Author(s):  
C. Stephen Evans

Why did the Biblical writers see the fear of the Lord as a virtue that is conducive to human flourishing? It is difficult for contemporary readers to understand how fear of anything can be virtuous. I propose that the fear of the Lord should be understood as accountability to God. I defend the claim that someone who displays excellence in an accountability relationship does display a virtue, and that this virtue is particularly valuable when exercised in relation to God. If we reject an individualistic view of moral motivation inspired by Kant, we can see that being held accountable does not necessarily diminish personal autonomy. The primary motivation for the person who has the virtue of accountability is not fear of punishment, but a desire to do what is right because it is right, rooted in an appreciation of the standing of one to whom one is accountable.


Author(s):  
Raymond C. Van Leeuwen

Although wisdom is usually seen as separate from Covenant Theology, a full-orbed, canonical account of wisdom will lead us to consider wisdom and covenant as linked by their common root in creation. Biblical Israel conceived of wisdom as a divine or human capacity rooted and revealed in creation, and implicitly inseparable from covenant as its theological presupposition. This chapter discusses the nature of wisdom as a concept, the presuppositions and conditions associated with it, and what it does. It situates wisdom and covenant in the created order as all three realities converge in the fear of the Lord.


2013 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 652-662
Author(s):  
Zoltán Schwáb

Abstract Despite the diverse interpretations of Prov. 1:7; 9:10, and related verses, scholars have agreed on a crucial point: these verses teach that wisdom stems from the fear of the Lord. Stuart Weeks has challenged this consensus recently, claiming that the relationship works the other way: the fear of the Lord follows from wisdom. I will argue that much of Weeks’ critique of the “traditional” interpretation is correct. Nevertheless, I will also argue that, if it is put carefully, a certain form of the usual understanding of Prov. 1:7 and 9:10 can still be maintained.


1909 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-185
Author(s):  
Ralph Barton Perry

It is generally agreed that religion is either the paramount issue or the most serious obstacle to progress. To its devotees religion is of overwhelming importance; to unbelievers it is, in the phrasing of Burke, “superstitious folly, enthusiastical nonsense, and holy tyranny.” The difference between the friends and the enemies of religion may, I think, be resolved as follows. Religion recognizes some final arbitration of human destiny; it is a lively awareness of the fact that, while man proposes, it is only within certain narrow limits that he can dispose his own plans. His nicest adjustments and most ardent longings are overruled; he knows that until he can discount or conciliate that which commands his fortunes his condition is precarious and miserable. And through his eagerness to save himself he leaps to conclusions that are uncritical and premature. Irreligion, on the other hand, flourishes among those who are more snugly intrenched within the cities of man. It is a product of civilization. Comfortably housed as he is, and enjoying an artificial illumination behind drawn blinds, the irreligious man has the heart to criticize the hasty speculations and abject fear of those who stand without in the presence of the surrounding darkness. In other words, religion is perpetually on the exposed side of civilization, sensitive to the blasts that blow from the surrounding universe; while irreligion is in the lee of civilization, with enough remove from danger to foster a refined concern for logic and personal liberty. There is a sense, then, in which both religion and irreligion are to be justified. If religion is guilty of unreason, irreligion is guilty of apathy. For without doubt the situation of the individual man is broadly such as religion conceives it to be. There is nothing that he can build, nor any precaution that he can take, that weighs appreciably in the balance against the powers which decree good and ill fortune, catastrophe and triumph, life and death. Hence to be without fear is the part of folly. Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document