Theory of mind in adolescents with autism

Author(s):  
Sander Begeer ◽  
Anke M. Scheeren
2020 ◽  
pp. 003329411989812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mishon Lecheler ◽  
Jon Lasser ◽  
Phillip W. Vaughan ◽  
Jesi Leal ◽  
Kirstina Ordetx ◽  
...  

Theory of Mind (ToM) is the capacity to make attributions of mental states such as thoughts, feelings, and beliefs of others. Individuals with autism spectrum disorder are often characterized by delayed or impaired Theory of Mind development and poor social skills. A positive correlation between Theory of Mind skills and social skills exists, but effective interventions that generalize these skills have proven to be a challenge in the field. Furthermore, few effective interventions exist to increase Theory of Mind skills in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. The Teaching Theory of Mind curriculum is a 12-week intervention aimed at increasing social understanding in children and adolescents with deficits in Theory of Mind. To date, there have not been any empirical studies to test the efficacy of the curriculum. The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of the Teaching Theory of Mind curriculum on adolescents with autism spectrum disorder and explore the impact of the intervention when addressing various domains of social understanding. Results, though tentative, indicated that parents saw improved social understanding following intervention, though direct measures of Theory of Mind with adolescent participants did not change significantly.


2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiorenzo Laghi ◽  
Antonia Lonigro ◽  
Simona Levanto ◽  
Maurizio Ferraro ◽  
Emma Baumgartner ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajesh K. Kana ◽  
Jose O. Maximo ◽  
Diane L. Williams ◽  
Timothy A. Keller ◽  
Sarah E. Schipul ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Del Giudice

Abstract The argument against innatism at the heart of Cognitive Gadgets is provocative but premature, and is vitiated by dichotomous thinking, interpretive double standards, and evidence cherry-picking. I illustrate my criticism by addressing the heritability of imitation and mindreading, the relevance of twin studies, and the meaning of cross-cultural differences in theory of mind development. Reaching an integrative understanding of genetic inheritance, plasticity, and learning is a formidable task that demands a more nuanced evolutionary approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document