Relational accountability in Indigenous governance

2020 ◽  
pp. 295-309
Author(s):  
Jean Dennison
Keyword(s):  
Indigenous Governance ◽  
Relational Accountability

Yarning as protected space: relational accountability in research

2021 ◽  
pp. 117718012098615
Author(s):  
Stuart Barlo ◽  
William (Bill) Edgar Boyd ◽  
Margaret Hughes ◽  
Shawn Wilson ◽  
Alessandro Pelizzon
Keyword(s):  
Research Methodology ◽  
Personal Experience ◽  
Indigenous Research ◽  
Indigenous Australian ◽  
Australian Context ◽  
Data History ◽  
Research Relationships ◽  
Relational Accountability ◽  
Relational Process ◽  
The Way

In this article, we open up Yarning as a fundamentally relational methodology. We discuss key relationships involved in Indigenous research, including with participants, Country, Ancestors, data, history, and Knowledge. We argue that the principles and protocols associated with the deepest layers of yarning in an Indigenous Australian context create a protected space which supports the researcher to develop and maintain accountability in each of these research relationships. Protection and relational accountability in turn contribute to research which is trustworthy and has integrity. Woven throughout the article are excerpts of a yarn in which the first author reflects on his personal experience of this research methodology. We hope this device serves to demonstrate the way yarning as a relational process of communication helps to bring out deeper reflection and analysis and invoke accountability in all of our research relationships.

Indigenous governance

1996 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 310-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pat O'Malley
Keyword(s):  
Indigenous Governance

scholarly journals Developing an Indigenous goal-setting tool: Counting Coup

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-57
Author(s):  
Iitáa Dáakuash ◽  
Alma McCormick ◽  
Shannen Keene ◽  
John Hallett ◽  
Suzanne Held
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Illness ◽  
Goal Setting ◽  
Indigenous Communities ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Goal Theory ◽  
Management Intervention ◽  
Management Interventions ◽  
Indigenous Paradigm ◽  
Relational Accountability

Chronic illness self-management best practices include goal-setting as an important tool for developing better self-management habits and are often included as elements of chronic disease self-management interventions. However, the goal theory that many of these tools employ relies on individualistic principles of self-efficacy that are not culturally consonant within many Indigenous communities. During the creation of the [blinded] program, a chronic illness management intervention, we developed a goal-setting tool specific to the [blinded] Nation. Emerging from an Indigenous paradigm and methodology, Counting Coup serves as a goal-setting tool that promotes the [blinded] culture, connects individuals with their ancestors, and focuses on achievement of goals within relationships. Future research and practice should be grounded in the historical and cultural contexts of their communities when designing and implementing goal-setting tools. Limitations to Counting Coup as a goal-setting tool include the need for program facilitators to have a relationship with participants due to Counting Coup’s foundation in relational accountability and that the environmental context may pose difficulties for participants in moving towards behavior change.

Indigenous Governance Systems and Democracy in Ethiopia: Yejoka Qicha System of the Gurage People

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Birhanu Bitew ◽  
Asabu Sewenet ◽  
Getachew Fentahun
Keyword(s):  
Economic Benefits ◽  
Political Elites ◽  
African Nation ◽  
Governance Systems ◽  
Indigenous Governance

Indigenous governance systems within the Eastern African nation of Ethiopia are often dismissed by Western political elites as undemocratic. We assessed the nature of and level of democracy in Indigenous governance systems in Ethiopia by focusing on the Yejoka Qicha of the Gurage people. We found that, while the Yejoka Qicha system includes democratic elements that can support national efforts to consolidate democracy, it also marginalizes some groups, such as women, from political and economic benefits. As such, we recommend the implementation of policies that eliminate the oppressive aspects of the Yejoka Qicha system, while also recognizing the role that these Indigenous governance systems can have in promoting democracy within Ethiopia.  

Energy democracy at the scale of Indigenous governance

2021 ◽  
pp. 51-65
Author(s):  
Danielle Endres ◽  
Taylor N. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Indigenous Governance
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document