scholarly journals Stratification and Attainment in a Large Japanese Firm

2018 ◽  
pp. 317-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seymour Spilerman ◽  
Hiroshi Ishida
Keyword(s):  
1997 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 133
Author(s):  
Michael L. Gerlach ◽  
Masahiko Aoki ◽  
Ronald Dore

2003 ◽  
Vol 07 (10) ◽  
pp. 496-502

Prima Subsidiary Breakthrough in Malaria Experiments. Biota Achieves HIV Drug Breakthrough. China Business News. Sino-French Collaboration. US to Export Synthetic DNA to Japanese Firm. Genesis and EvoGenix Collaborates to Discover Anti-Inflammatory Drug. Biomedical Strategy Consultants Marches into Europe. Athelas and MerLion to Work Together on Anti-Infectives. BioPhotoFullerenes to Open HQ in Taiwan. Kiotek to Produce Medical-Standard Chitosan. TaiGen to Buy Microbubble Drug Delivery Technology. Intel Launches Itanium2 Server to Address Bioinformatics Market.


Author(s):  
Gerry Yemen ◽  
Kristin J. Behfar ◽  
Allison Elias

Most talented executives can recognize when an acquisition has strategic or financial benefits, and in this case, the decision to be acquired was an appropriate exit strategy for a successful start-up. Peter Street’s start-up had been growing quickly and was building a reputation for reliability in a booming industry when a Japanese firm offered to pay a premium for the U.S. firm. Having done business in Japan (and extensively with the acquiring company) before the sale of his company, Street entered the acquisition with enthusiasm. As part of the deal, Street’s former company would continue to operate in the United States as a division of its parent company and Street would remain as CEO. A few months into the transition, however, Street discovered a huge difference between working with and working for the Japanese firm. Cultural norms for confronting seemingly small problems quickly became bigger operational issues, and Street experienced a growing dichotomy between corporate (in Japan) and his division (in the United States). This case focuses on the challenges of implementing a cross-border acquisition.


2020 ◽  
Vol 65 (05) ◽  
pp. 1293-1321
Author(s):  
KAORU HOSONO ◽  
DAISUKE MIYAKAWA ◽  
MIHO TAKIZAWA ◽  
KENTA YAMANOUCHI

Using Japanese firm-level panel data spanning from 2000 to 2013, we estimate industry-level production functions that explicitly take into account the complementarity and substitutability between tangible and intangible capital. The estimation results show that tangible and intangible capitals are complementary in most industries although the degree of complementarity substantially varies across industries. We further find that the relation between tangible and intangible capital in the production function accounts for the relation between firm-level tangible capital and intangible capital investments. Namely, firms’ tangible investments are more strongly positively associated with intangible investments as the degree of the complementarity between the tangible and intangible assets becomes larger. These findings show the necessity to take into account the relation between the dynamics of tangible and intangible capital in terms of their complementarity for precisely understanding the mechanisms governing a firm’s growth.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document