Harvard Law Review the Trade Secret Status of Health and Safety Testing Information: Reforming Agency Disclosure Policies

2020 ◽  
pp. 251-302
Author(s):  
Thomas O. McGarity ◽  
Sidney A. Shapiro
2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary A. Collier ◽  
Alan J. Kennedy ◽  
Aimee R. Poda ◽  
Michael F. Cuddy ◽  
Robert D. Moser ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Heather B. Patisaul ◽  
Scott M. Belcher

This introductory chapter aims to provide an initial overview of the connections between current trends of increasing prevalence of behavioral disorders in children, which persist through adulthood, and increasing exposures to man-made environmental chemicals. A foundational definition of endocrine disruptors is presented and is contrasted with traditional definitions of reproductive and endocrine toxicity. Historical and current examples of specific disorders in humans and wildlife species associated with endocrine disruptor exposures are presented. Current trends of the rapid development of new chemicals and how they come to market with little or no safety testing are examined. Using lead as a case study of how chemical policy has been driven by corporate interests, rather than public health and safety, the chapter introduces the origins of chemical safety and policy based on proof of harm. Key concepts and controversy surrounding the acceptance of the “endocrine disruptor hypothesis” are examined.


Risk Analysis ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 1783-1795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Kennedy ◽  
Jonathon Brame ◽  
Taylor Rycroft ◽  
Matthew Wood ◽  
Valerie Zemba ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Kennedy ◽  
Jonathon Brame ◽  
Taylor Rycroft ◽  
Matthew Wood ◽  
Valerie Zemba ◽  
...  

Novel materials with unique or enhanced properties relative to conventional materials are being developed at an increasing rate. These materials are often referred to as advanced materials (AdMs) and they enable technological innovations that can benefit society. Despite their benefits, however, the unique characteristics of many AdMs, including many nanomaterials, are poorly understood and may pose environmental safety and occupational health (ESOH) risks that are not readily determined by traditional risk assessment methods. To assess these risks while keeping up with the pace of development, technology developers and risk assessors frequently employ risk-screening methods that depend on a clear definition for the materials that are to be assessed (e.g., engineered nanomaterial) as well as a method for binning materials into categories for ESOH risk prioritization. In this study, we aim to establish a practitioner-driven definition for AdMs and a practitioner-validated framework for categorizing AdMs into conceptual groupings based on material characteristics. The definition and categorization framework established here serve as a first step in determining if and when there is a need for specific ESOH and regulatory screening for an AdM as well as the type and extent of risk-related information that should be collected or generated for AdMs and AdM-enabled technologies.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah M. Curtis ◽  
Hendrika Meischke ◽  
Nancy Simcox ◽  
Sarah Laslett ◽  
Noah Seixas

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document