Sustainable Fisheries Management and International Law

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullah Al Arif
2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 1176-1189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gavin McDonald ◽  
Molly Wilson ◽  
Diogo Veríssimo ◽  
Rebecca Twohey ◽  
Michaela Clemence ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 323-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin F. Quaas ◽  
Max T. Stoeven ◽  
Bernd Klauer ◽  
Thomas Petersen ◽  
Johannes Schiller

2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 801-832
Author(s):  
Lene Korseberg

AbstractThe second half of the twentieth century saw major improvements in the legal regime for fisheries management. This notwithstanding, the deep seas remain largely unregulated under international law, until recently only being covered by the general environmental and management provisions found in UNCLOS. In light of this regulatory gap, this article evaluates the potential law-making effects, if any, of the FAO Deep-Sea Fisheries Guidelines, a voluntary instrument designed to provide States with a regulatory framework for the management of their deep-sea fisheries. It considers how the Guidelines may inform, interpret and influence the content of the general high-sea obligations in UNCLOS. Despite the vagueness and generality of those provisions, some indication of their substantive content has been given in recent decisions, particularly the South China Sea Arbitration. By assessing their compatibility, and their level of acceptance by the international community, this article argues that the FAO Deep-Sea Guidelines are beginning to have a law-making effect by providing an authoritative interpretation of the general high-sea obligations found in UNCLOS relating to deep-sea fisheries.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Joseph Edlin

<p>The Marine Stewardship Council eco-labelling scheme was formed in order to provide a means of promoting sustainable fisheries that moved away from conventional top-down management. In order to remain robust and transparent, MSC allows stakeholders to object to a certification through an objections process outlined by MSC. Over the past 15 years, this objections process has come under increasing scrutiny. The MSC OP has been accused of Ambiguous wording, principal agent issues and an unequal judicial process by some stakeholders and outside commentators. These accusations pose a real threat to the reputation of the MSC. If left un-addressed, MSC’s credibility amongst consumers and academics has the potential to be lost. This thesis seeks to investigate the legitimacy and robustness of the MSC OP. There is a focus on the way in which the MSC OP facilitates interactions between objection actors, influences actors, and how each actor is empowered by the MSC OP methodology.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document