Overlapping Collectivities: Local Concern, State Welfare and Social Membership

2021 ◽  
pp. 195-227
Author(s):  
Gavin Smith
Keyword(s):  
1993 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 419-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
David T. Beito

Few terms have recurred so often in the work of American social welfare historians as “deserving” (or worthy) and “undeserving” (unworthy). These concepts, of course, describe criteria employed by private and government agencies to determine eligibility for social welfare assistance. A special object of concern in the literature has been their use, in particular misuse, by charity organizations and welfare agencies during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.


Author(s):  
Dan Horsfall ◽  
John Hudson

This concluding chapter highlights key arguments from across the book in order to set out an integrated agenda for future research. Theoretically rooted analyses must be at the core of such an agenda. The inter-pollination/cross-fertilisation of ideas from many disciplines is important in developing an understanding of the complex and multi-faceted ways in which competition is influencing welfare states. However, while theory is central to this agenda, it must also be rooted in detailed empirical analysis. In looking to transcend the competition state/welfare state dichotomy, this interplay between theory and evidence is key, and where theoretically rooted social policy analysts can add particular value to current debates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document