The Child Interview

2021 ◽  
pp. 113-133
Author(s):  
Donald A. Hayden
Keyword(s):  
1992 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 365-366
Author(s):  
Jonathan Sandoval
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 846-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonni L. Johnson ◽  
Alexandra E. Shelley
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nebi Sümer ◽  
Ezgi Sakman ◽  
Mehmet Harma ◽  
Özge Savaş

1986 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 306-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROBERT S. PYNOOS ◽  
SPENCER ETH
Keyword(s):  

1996 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie H. McConaughy ◽  
Thomas M. Achenbach

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-31
Author(s):  
Ben Grey ◽  
Steve Farnfield

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to report on the initial validation of a new method, called the “Meaning of the Child Interview” (MotC), to assess the psychological meaning all children have for their parents, but which in cases of risk, submerge or distort the child’s identity. The MotC analyses parental discourse using a method developed from the discourse analysis used to classify the Adult Attachment Interview together with patterns derived from the infant CARE-Index, a procedure that evaluates face-to-face parent-child interaction. This allows the MotC to illuminate how the parent’s thinking influences the developing relationship between parent and child. Design/methodology/approach Parents are interviewed using the Parent Development Interview (PDI), or an equivalent, and then the interview transcript is classified using the MotC system. The coding method was developed from interviews drawn from the first author’s work with children and families in the family court system, and then tested with a sample of 85 mothers and fathers, 62 of whom were parents drawn from an “at risk” context. The parents were also videoed in a short free play interaction, using the CARE-Index. Findings The study found a strong correspondence between the levels of risk as assessed by the MotC patterns of parental representation of care giving, the risk to the parent-child relationship observed using the CARE-Index. There was also corroboration of the patterns of interaction identified by the MotC. Originality/value The results of the study provide good evidence for the Meaning of the Child as an identifiable construct, and as an assessment tool to identify and assess the nature of “at risk” parent-child relationships. MotC was developed in a clinical setting within the Family Court justice system, and is designed to offer assistance to child protection and mental health practitioners deciding how to intervene in particular parent-child relationships.


2006 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 537-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis Manfra ◽  
Adam Winsler

The present study explored: (a) preschool children's awareness of their own talking and private speech (speech directed to the self); (b) differences in age, speech use, language ability, and mentalizing abilities between children with awareness and those without; and (c) children's beliefs and attitudes about private speech. Fifty-one children between the ages of 3 and 5 completed a selective attention task from which a sample of private speech was video-recorded for use during a subsequent experimenter–child interview. Children also completed a standardized language assessment and a battery of mentalizing tasks. Roughly half of the children (54%) showed awareness of talking during the task, and 52% of the children who talked during the task stated that their speech was self-directed. Children who were aware of their private speech were significantly older, had greater expressive language skills, used more private speech, and had higher deceptive-box scores than children who were not aware of their private speech. Participants believed that private speech was positive and helpful. Implications of this work for researchers and early childhood educators are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document