Pottery, social memory, and household cooperation in the Woodland-period Southeast U.S.

2021 ◽  
pp. 27-52
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Pluckhahn ◽  
Neill J. Wallis
1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 245-285
Author(s):  
Paul A. Raber

Investigations at 36Ch161, a site in the Piedmont Uplands of Chester County, Pennsylvania, have revealed a series of early Late Woodland Period camps associated with the Minguannan Complex. The use of local quartz seems to have been a primary focus of settlement at the site. Quartz, which formed an overwhelming majority of the assemblage, was used in ways that contrast strongly with that of non-local materials like jasper, a minority component of the assemblage obtained from quarries in the Hardyston Formation. The selection of raw materials suggests restrictions on access to certain materials perhaps imposed by territorial constraints. The combined evidence of artifact assemblage and cultural features indicates that 36Ch161 was inhabited seasonally by small, mobile groups of non-horticulturalists, a reconstruction consistent with that of Custer and others regarding the economy of the Minguannan Complex and related cultures of the Piedmont Uplands.


2021 ◽  
Vol 171 ◽  
pp. 56-66
Author(s):  
Paula Lunardi ◽  
Lara M.Z. Mansk ◽  
Laura F. Jaimes ◽  
Grace S. Pereira
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-397
Author(s):  
Meghan J. Dudley ◽  
Jenna Domeischel

ABSTRACTAlthough we, as archaeologists, recognize the value in teaching nonprofessionals about our discipline and the knowledge it generates about the human condition, there are few of these specialists compared to the number of archaeologists practicing today. In this introductory article to the special section titled “Touching the Past to Learn the Past,” we suggest that, because of our unique training as anthropologists and archaeologists, each of us has the potential to contribute to public archaeology education. By remembering our archaeological theory, such as social memory, we can use the artifacts we engage with on a daily basis to bridge the disconnect between what the public hopes to gain from our interactions and what we want to teach them. In this article, we outline our perspective and present an overview of the other three articles in this section that apply this approach in their educational endeavors.


Author(s):  
Andrew B. Lehr ◽  
Arvind Kumar ◽  
Christian Tetzlaff ◽  
Torkel Hafting ◽  
Marianne Fyhn ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 111 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-226
Author(s):  
Simon Butticaz

AbstractThis article aims at describing the Lukan project by applying – in the wake of other scholars – social memory theories to Luke’s double work. In particular, it argues that the type of memory and its criteria defined by Jan Assmann on the basis of the Deuteronomy can help explain the nature of the narrative composed by the auctor ad Theophilum as well as its originality in an early Christian context marked by a proliferation of books and other traditions of the origins of the Church (cf. Luke 1:1a.2.4).


1957 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 343-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam L. Witryol ◽  
Walter A. Kaess

1991 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.E. Ploeger ◽  
A.P.M. Willemen ◽  
A.R. Cools

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document