Response To Intervention And The Autonomous Learner Model

2021 ◽  
pp. 149-168
Author(s):  
George T. Betts ◽  
Robin Carey
2012 ◽  
pp. 310-321
Author(s):  
Nahid Yarahmadzehi ◽  
Elham Bazleh

Classroom-based, teacher-directed language learning has been dominant in language teaching and learning for decades; however, the notion of autonomy is not novel to language teachers. Since the publication of Holec’s book, Autonomy and Foreign Language Learning (1981), autonomy in language learning has been a significant issue for discussion in relation to language learning practices and language teaching principles. Many ESL researchers have turned their attention to learner autonomy in classroom settings; however, learner autonomy in the Iranian context within self-access settings, classroom settings, and school curriculum has not been adequately addressed in the literature. To fill the research gap mentioned above, the present study aims to determine: 1. if Betts’s Autonomous Learner Model (Betts & Kercher, 1999) has any significant effect in terms of students’ self-directed learning readiness, and 2. if Betts’s Autonomous Learner Model has any significant effect on students’ English language proficiency. Adopting a quasi-experimental design, the study involved a comparison between the experimental and the control group. Two instruments were used: Gugliemino’s (1977) Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale (SDLRS); and standardized TOEFL test. 30 students (group A) were taught English based on a pedagogical model, which blended Betts’s ALM with classroom instruction and 30 students (group B) were taught through a traditional teacher-directed method. Finally, after six months of treatment, TOEFL test and SDLRS test were administered as the post-test and the results were analyzed by means of SPSS software. The results showed that ALM can work with Iranian students as evidenced by generally average performance on SDLRS and TOEFL post-tests.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
George T. Betts ◽  
Robin J. Carey ◽  
Blanche M. Kapushion

Author(s):  
George Betts ◽  
Blanche Kapushion ◽  
Robin J. Carey

2021 ◽  
pp. 91-114
Author(s):  
George T. Betts ◽  
Robin J. Carey ◽  
Blanche M. Kapushion

1993 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janis Fall ◽  
Linda Nolan

The term gifted learning disabled (GLD) is a relatively new idea in special education. The term elicits confusion among parents, educators, and the students themselves. A student with outstanding skills in one area and a significant deficit in another may not be succeeding in school, but still have talents far beyond his peers. This dichotomy leaves the student frustrated, his parents puzzled, and his teachers feeling helpless. There are programming strategies that can be effective for this type of student. The Autonomous Learner Model (Betts, 1985) has been adapted to provide activities to meet the diversified needs of these gifted and talented students with learning difficulties.


2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 116-121
Author(s):  
Janet L. Proly

Abstract Response to Intervention (RTI) implementation is becoming more widespread due to the references of RTI components in the Federal Regulations. But everyone is not at the same level of understanding about RTI and its implementation. This article will answer several questions. What is RTI? Why are we hearing more and more about RTI? How are states implementing RTI components? How can the speech-language pathologist help in RTI implementation in the presence or absence of a specific RTI infrastructure? How is Florida Proceeding with RTI implementation? Are there any new resources available for principals and other educators who might want to learn more about RTI?


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document